环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 48-54.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.05.008

• 有机固废生物处理与高值化利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

餐厨废弃油脂制生物柴油全生命周期碳排放分析研究

李剑颖,任晓灵,王晓燕,赖金丽   

  1. 1.北京市城市管理研究院;2.生活垃圾检测分析与评价北京市重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2024-11-01 发布日期:2024-11-01

Analysis and Research on Carbon Emissions Throughout the Life Cycle of Biodiesel Production from Kitchen Waste Oils and Fats

LI Jianying, REN Xiaoling, WANG Xiaoyan, LAI Jinli   

  1. 1. Beijing Municipal Institute of City Management;2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Waste Detection Analysis and Evaluation
  • Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-11-01

摘要: “双碳”背景下,餐厨废弃油脂制备生物柴油在实现“变废为宝”以及能源绿色低碳转型中将会发挥重要作用。对餐厨废弃油脂从产生到制成生物柴油的全生命周期能源消耗、温室气体排放量进行了清单分析,与石化柴油生产全过程进行了对比,并分析了餐厨废弃油脂制备生物柴油过程中每个阶段的温室气体排放贡献以及生物酶法与传统酯交换法制备生物柴油阶段能源消耗及碳排放对比。结果表明:与石化柴油相比,采用生物酶法制得的生物柴油能耗降低71.43%,CO2、温室气体GWP分别减排60.09%、59.79%;地沟油、煎炸油预处理及废弃油脂深加工这两个阶段是废弃油脂全生命周期能耗与温室气体排放的主要阶段,甲醇与蒸汽生产引起的温室气体排放是主要原因;与酯交换法相比,利用生物酶法制生物柴油工艺能耗降低4.58%,CO2排放量、温室气体GWP分别减少38.53%、38.52%。建议在我国发展以餐厨废弃油脂为原料的生物柴油加工处理工艺,杜绝餐厨废弃油脂回流餐桌,节约化石能源消耗,减少温室气体排放。

关键词: 餐厨废弃油脂, 温室气体, 碳排放, 全生命周期, 生物柴油

Abstract: Under the background of “dual carbon”, the preparation of biodiesel from kitchen waste oil would play an important role in achieving “turning waste into treasure”and the green and low-carbon transformation of energy. The energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of kitchen waste oil throughout its lifecycle from production to the production of biodiesel were analyzed. And it was compared with the entire process of petrochemical diesel production. The greenhouse gas emissions contribution of each stage in the preparation of biodiesel from kitchen waste oil, as well as the energy consumption and CO2 emissions comparison of biodiesel production between enzymatic and traditional ester exchange methods were analyzed. The results showed that compared with petrochemical diesel, the energy consumption of biodiesel produced by enzymatic method was reduced by 71.43%, and the GWP of CO2 and greenhouse gas were reduced by 60.09% and 59.79%, respectively. The pre-treatment of trench oil and frying oil, as well as the deep processing of waste oil and fat, were the main stages of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions throughout the entire life cycle of waste oil and fat. The greenhouse gas emissions caused by methanol and steam production was the main reasons. Compared with the ester exchange method, the energy consumption of biodiesel process using bioenzyme method was reduced by 4.58%, and the GWP of CO2 and greenhouse gas were reduced by 38.53% and 38.52%, respectively. It was recommended to develop a biodiesel processing technology using kitchen waste oil as raw material in China, to prevent kitchen waste oil from flowing back to the dining table, save fossil energy consumption, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Key words: kitchen waste oil and fat, greenhouse gases, carbon emissions, full life cycle, biodiesel

[1] 彭晓为, 唐玉婷, 钟日钢, 余昭胜, 林 延, 吴 浩. 碳减排约束下不同能源类型垃圾转运车适用性竞争力分析——以深圳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 1-8.
[2] 王天娇, 李 敏, 王 乾, 苗宪宝, 徐 林, 李义华. 生活垃圾焚烧、填埋及污水处理中长时间碳排放水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 75-84.
[3] 蒋 宇, 谭瑶瑶, 李 东, 邓 放, 陈 琼, 郑晓倩. 成都市城市管理领域温室气体排放特征及减排策略[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 85-92.
[4] 张 栋. 厨余垃圾三相有机固渣不同利用方式碳排放分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 104-109.
[5] 朱远超, 赵子旼, 张劲松. 厨余垃圾和农林废弃物好氧堆肥协同处理碳排放核算——以某镇处理设施为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 111-115.
[6] 毕珠洁, 邰 俊, 王 川. 上海生活垃圾处理碳排放现状与预测研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 1-8.
[7] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[8] 张秉昕, 高 明, 唐卫奇, 王晓娜, 吴川福, 汪群慧, 张少明, 陈献锟. 生物质预处理提高炭基固体酸催化剂酯化效率的本质机理[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 127-127.
[9] 高 振, 马英群, 刘 雨, 汪群慧. 餐饮废油作为碳源用于微生物油脂生产:促进还是抑制?[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 125-125.
[10] 孙雨清, 钱寅飞, 储思琴. 苏州市垃圾分类对焚烧过程碳排放的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 104-111.
[11] 淦方茂, 吴莉鑫, 虞文波, 胡 广, 惠二青, 郭 帅. 村镇生活垃圾不同处置模式下温室气体排放潜力对比研究——以湖北埠河镇为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 112-118.
[12] 程世昆, 龙锦云, Barbara Evans, 战 哲, 李天昕, 陈 聪, Heinz-Peter Mang, 李子富. 不可忽视的无下水道卫生系统温室气体排放[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 112-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[2] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[3] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[4] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[5] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[6] 杨磊锋杨非邢家乐李加文. 垃圾气力输送管路特性参数试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 90 -94 .
[7] 施乐荣刘荣杰观梦韵朱静怡陈朱琦吴远明吴立. 基于垃圾分类的废旧纺织品的单独回收对深圳市生活垃圾处理的碳足迹影响分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 4 -8 .
[8] 王建伟 朱 杰 朱雁鸣 等. 熔融法处理垃圾焚烧飞灰过程中可溶盐富集规律研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 15 -19 .
[9] 汪 洋,邓 纲,徐方利,刘永华. 成都市万兴环保发电厂增加污泥干化协同焚烧工艺的技术方案分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2019, 27(1): 43 -46 .
[10] 余 毅. 某大型非正规垃圾填埋场环境调查与风险管控方案[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2019, 27(3): 72 -75 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发