环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 90-96.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.03.012

• 固体废物源特征与收运系统 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾分类背景下广州市可回收物组分与特性研究

高 慧   

  1. 广州市城市管理技术研究中心
  • 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-07-01

Research on the Components and Characteristics of Recyclable Materials in Guangzhou City Under the Background of Domestic Waste Classification

GAO Hui   

  1. Guangzhou City Management Technical Research Center
  • Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-07-01

摘要: 资源回收利用是“无废城市”建设中的关键一环,而可回收物的回收利用是垃圾分类工作中的短板。以典型区域为切入点,通过现场调研、实验分析等方式,研究居民生活垃圾中可回收物产生及分类情况,分析其组分及理化特性等。结果表明:近10年广州市进入环卫清运系统生活源垃圾组分中的可回收物占比(9.9%~24.5%)在波动变化中逐渐降低,其中高值可回收物均值为6.73%,低值可回收物波动下降。2021—2023年,G街道年生活垃圾产生量中高值可回收物占比(21.20%~33.34%)逐年升高,低值可回收物占比逐年降低;G街道黑桶中按垃圾分类组分分析,可回收物占比由23.73%降至15.80%,其中纸皮类、塑胶、金属均逐年降低;按物理组分分析,橡塑类(28.58%~31.28%)含量较高,纸类和玻璃类略升高;6类样品理化特性显示,废纸类含水率(38.94%±3.30%)最高,塑料袋和塑胶干基高位热值高于生活垃圾均值,塑料袋和纸皮类的灰分较高,其他4类均在1.00%左右;塑料袋的Pb和Hg含量(以干基计)最高,分别为(11.75±6.18)、(0.063±0.086) mg/kg;织物的总Cr、As含量最高,塑料袋、织物等混入终端焚烧会加重飞灰、炉渣的重金属毒性。本研究结果可为可回收物选择合适的回收处理方式提供参考依据,提升其回收率及经济价值,助力“无废城市”建设。

关键词: 可回收物, 组分, 理化特性, 生活垃圾, 广州

Abstract: Resource recycling and utilization is a key link in the construction of a “zero-waste city”, while the recycling and utilization of recyclable materials is a shortcoming in the work of waste classification. Taking typical areas as the entry point, through on-site investigation, experimental analysis and other methods, the generation and classification of recyclable materials in residents’ domestic waste were studied, and their components, physical and chemical properties were analyzed. The results indicated that the proportion of recyclable materials (9.9%-24.5%) in the components of domestic waste in Guangzhou’s sanitation collection system has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, with high-value recyclables averaging 6.73% and low-value recyclables exhibiting a decreasing trend. From 2021 to 2023, the proportion of high-value recyclables in domestic waste generated in G street (21.20%-33.34%) has been increasing year by year, while the proportion of low-value recyclables has decreased. According to the analysis of waste classification components in the black bins of G street, the proportion of recyclable materials has decreased from 23.73% to 15.80%, with paper, plastic, and metal all decreasing year by year. Regarding physical composition, the content of rubber and plastic (28.58%-31.28%) was relatively high, while the proportions of paper and glass were slightly higher.The physicochemical analysis of six waste categories showed that waste paper had the highest moisture content (38.94%±3.30%), while the high calorific value of plastic bags and plastics dry basis was higher than the average value of domestic waste. The ash content of plastic bags and paper scraps was relatively high, while the other four categories remained around 1.00%. The concentrations of Pb and Hg (on a dry basis) in plastic bags were the highest, measured at (11.75±6.18) mg/kg and (0.063±0.086) mg/kg, respectively. The total Cr and As contents of fabrics was the highest, and the mixture of plastic bags, fabrics and other materials into terminal incineration would increase the heavy metal toxicity of fly ash and slag. The results of this study can provide reference for selecting appropriate recycling methods for recyclable materials, while improving their recycling rate and economic value, and assisting in the construction of a “zero-waste city”.

Key words: recyclable materials, component, physical and chemical properties, domestic waste, Guangzhou

[1] 苏 莉, 刘 敏, 褚一威, 杨永健, 马 宁, 张 博, 张金伟. 生活垃圾气力输送系统的应用现状、技术挑战与“双碳”目标下的创新发展路径[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(2): 55-67.
[2] 耿 聪. 生活垃圾中转站竖式压机结构优化工程实例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(2): 68-74.
[3] 毕珠洁, 李正杰, 楼紫阳. 碳普惠视角下生活垃圾分类各环节的碳减排权益拆分研究——以上海为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(2): 109-116.
[4] 武一奇, 许雯佳. 生活垃圾处理处置工程建设标准体系构建研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(2): 117-122.
[5] 胡斯怡, 王 宁, 张 浩, 杨 涛, 蔡嘉瑞, 安钊辉, 龙吉生, SCHWARZBÖCK Therese, FELLNER Johann, 李晓东. 垃圾焚烧发电厂入炉垃圾碳源在线监测方法及其示范应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 1-9.
[6] 孙祎美, 窦王芮, 李海梅, 吴 超, 王嘉睿, 刘意立. 基于系统动力学的城市生活垃圾分类收运系统车辆选型对成本与温室气体排放影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 10-16,27.
[7] 崔超现, 马兆军, 赵鑫磊, 史 萌, 陈 宣, 张 胜, 陈荣杰, 张衍国. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰和赤泥协同熔融处理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 81-87.
[8] 李娜英, 韩智勇, 郭南飞, 周志强, 刘 莹, 唐钱刚. 正规与非正规城市生活垃圾填埋场中微塑料的时空分布及塑料降解菌鉴定[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 127-127.
[9] 秦 朗, 郑晓萍, 刘明宇, 张继勇, 王乐乐, 何宏平. 垃圾分类和疫情因素扰动下超大城市生活垃圾清运量预测研究——以广州市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 62-68.
[10] 高 慧. 华南某市源头其他垃圾与终端生活垃圾组分及特性对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 69-74,80.
[11] 丁 琮. 垃圾分类背景下华南某市厨余垃圾理化特性分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 75-80.
[12] 黄行柱, 胡平宇, 容毅浜, 袁维芳, 白彩鹏, 蓝志聪, 陈 华. 生活垃圾焚烧炉结焦及其防治技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 49-56,63.
[13] 段飞飞, 朱传强, 韩 昊. 生活垃圾焚烧项目SCR催化剂离线高温再生工程实践与分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 64-69.
[14] 刘庄泉. 中小型餐厨垃圾协同处置设计与工程实践[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 70-74.
[15] 缪周伟. 沿海地区垃圾填埋场污染评价与治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 75-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[2] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
[3] 刘子琳吴根义罗惠莉王宇霖周思周颖. 源头分类对农村生活垃圾就地处理的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 70 -72 .
[4] 姚凤根朱水元孙雨清夏金雨赵俊赵振振. 餐厨(厨余)垃圾碳源化技术及应用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 22 -25 .
[5] 蹇瑞欢吴剑宋薇. 生活垃圾焚烧与餐厨垃圾处理协同处置的分析研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 26 -28 .
[6] 申小艾. 银川市生活垃圾治理规划策略研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 81 -83 .
[7] 张瑞青 杜 鹏 梁 恒 等. 餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵+好氧发酵处理技术工程应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 90 -93 .
[8] 张瑞娜. 日本生活垃圾分类模式和实施效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(5): 4 -7 .
[9] 蒲 敏. 小型垃圾焚烧炉在我国农村应用的现状与发展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(6): 9 -11 .
[10] 汪 晶1,平 措1,周 鹏1,穷达卓玛1,周文武1,李 扬1,旦 增1, 2. 拉萨市生活垃圾卫生填埋场填埋气体调查研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2019, 27(2): 28 -32 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发