环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 62-68.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.06.006

• 固体废物源特征与收运系统 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾分类和疫情因素扰动下超大城市生活垃圾清运量预测研究——以广州市为例

秦 朗,郑晓萍,刘明宇,张继勇,王乐乐,何宏平   

  1. 1.广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院有限公司;2.广州市资源规划和海洋科技协同创新中心;3.广东省城市感知与监测预警企业重点实验室;4.郑州大学 生态与环境学院;5.深圳大学 化学与环境工程学院
  • 出版日期:2025-12-24 发布日期:2025-12-24

Prediction on Domestic Waste Removal Volume in Megacity Under the Disturbance of Garbage Classification and Epidemic Factors: A Case Study of Guangzhou

QIN Lang, ZHENG Xiaoping, LIU Mingyu, ZHANG Jiyong, WANG Lele, HE Hongping   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute Co. Ltd.; 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Natural Resources Planning and Marine Technology of Guangzhou; 3. Guangdong Enterprise Key Laboratory for Urban Sensing, Monitoring and Early Warning; 4. School of Ecology and Environment, Zhengzhou University; 5. College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University
  • Online:2025-12-24 Published:2025-12-24

摘要: 在垃圾强制分类政策实施和新冠疫情防控双重影响下,近些年超大城市的实际生活垃圾清运量出现显著波动性和结构性变化,给传统预测方法带来了挑战。本研究以珠三角地区超大城市广州市为例,基于历年生活垃圾清运量和相关因素统计数据,采用灰色关联度法甄别出对历史数据波动抗干扰性强的人均消费支出、人均生产总值、常住人口、城市建成区面积4项关键驱动因素;同时为捕捉社会事件的冲击效应,将生活垃圾强制分类政策实施和疫情防控作为虚拟变量引入多维灰色系统预测模型GM(1,6),分别预测在无疫情强分类、无疫情无分类、有疫情强分类、有疫情无分类4种场景下未来清运量。结果表明,相比GM(1,1)和GM(1,4),GM(1,6)模型精度和拟合效果得到显著提升。强制分类政策和疫情事件对垃圾清运量减量效果明显,在强分类情景下清运量增长率更为平缓,至2035年达到7.415 4×106 t,比无分类情景下的8.158 8×106 t降低了9%,反映了源头减量的长期效应。本研究可有效支撑“垃圾分类时代”超大城市生活垃圾系统规划和治理策略。

关键词: 生活垃圾, 清运量, 超大城市, 垃圾强制分类, 疫情, 多维灰色模型预测

Abstract: Under the dual impacts of the implementation of mandatory waste classification policies and COVID-19 prevention and control, the actual domestic waste removal and transportation volume in megacities has shown significant volatility and structural changes in recent years, posing challenges to traditional prediction methods. Taking Guangzhou, a megacity in the Pearl River Delta region, as an example, four key driving factors with strong anti-interference to historical data fluctuations were identified using the grey relational analysis method based on statistical data of domestic waste removal and transportation volume and related factors over the years. These factors were per capita consumption expenditure, per capita gross domestic product, permanent population, and urban built-up area. Meanwhile, to capture the impact of social events, mandatory domestic waste classification policy implementation and epidemic prevention and control were introduced as dummy variables into the multi-dimensional grey system prediction model GM(1,6). The model predicted the future waste removal and transportation volume under four scenarios: strong classification without epidemic, no classification without epidemic, strong classification with epidemic, and no classification with epidemic. The results showed that compared with GM(1,1) and GM(1,4) models, the GM(1,6) model had significantly improved accuracy and fitting effect. Mandatory classification policies and the epidemic have achieved obvious effects in reducing waste removal and transportation volume. Under the strong classification scenario, the growth rate of waste removal and transportation volume is more moderate, reaching 7.415 4 million tons by 2035, which is 9% lower than the 8.158 8 million tons under the no-classification scenario. This reflects the long-term effect of source reduction and effectively supports the system planning and governance strategies of domestic waste in megacities in the “waste classification era”.

Key words: domestic waste, removal volume, megacities, mandatory waste classification, epidemic, multi-dimensional grey model prediction

[1] 高 慧. 华南某市源头其他垃圾与终端生活垃圾组分及特性对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 69-74,80.
[2] 黄行柱, 胡平宇, 容毅浜, 袁维芳, 白彩鹏, 蓝志聪, 陈 华. 生活垃圾焚烧炉结焦及其防治技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 49-56,63.
[3] 段飞飞, 朱传强, 韩 昊. 生活垃圾焚烧项目SCR催化剂离线高温再生工程实践与分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 64-69.
[4] 刘庄泉. 中小型餐厨垃圾协同处置设计与工程实践[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 70-74.
[5] 缪周伟. 沿海地区垃圾填埋场污染评价与治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 75-82.
[6] 董军旗, 张贵宝, 厉江锋, 张才军, 罗娅琼, 项林凤, 曹 丽. 基于断裂带地层特性的填埋场复合防渗体系创新研究——以杭州天子岭为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 83-91.
[7] 方凯乐, 周 强, 汪 军, 冯 至, 吴 珣. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣在混凝土中资源化利用的研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 38-45.
[8] 白 力, 李慧康, 叶 璐. 好氧通风提高存量生活垃圾生物降解能力的试验研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 62-70.
[9] 王昕昕, 郑伟萍, 张文勇, 庄 颖, 董 方. 青岛市城市生活垃圾处理费征收工作研究及对策建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 112-116.
[10] 邱清文. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰填埋场岩土工程设计建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[11] 高 慧. 垃圾分类背景下广州市可回收物组分与特性研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 90-96.
[12] 段盼巧, 李雅昕, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧厂白烟来源及控制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[13] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[14] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[15] 齐佳楠, 周 硕, 宁 庆, 王 欢, 李 兵, 刘海威. 我国县域生活垃圾制备固体回收燃料工艺的技术经济性分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 23-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发