环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 1-11.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.02.001

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 •    下一篇

大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究

戚晓波,易 鹏,马云峰,林晓青   

  1. 1. 绍兴市环境产业有限公司;2. 绍兴市清能环保有限公司;3. 国科大杭州高等研究院 环境学院;4. 能源高效清洁利用全国重点实验室,固体废物能源化清洁利用技术与装备国家工程研究中心
  • 出版日期:2025-04-28 发布日期:2025-03-04

Study on the Combustion Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste Influenced by Large Proportion of Typical Industrial Solid Waste in a Solid Waste Incinerator

QI Xiaobo, YI Peng, MA Yunfeng, LIN Xiaoqing   

  1. 1. Shaoxing Environmental Industry Co. Ltd.; 2. Shaoxing Qingneng Environmental Protection Co. Ltd.; 3. School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS; 4. State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Clean Utilization Technology and Equipment of Solid Waste Energy, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University
  • Online:2025-04-28 Published:2025-03-04

摘要: 以绍兴市生活垃圾(MSW)和工业固废(ISW)为研究对象,充分聚焦生活垃圾焚烧系统大比例掺烧工业固废的重点和难点问题,结合实验室模拟研究和实际焚烧系统掺烧试验详细研究了二者的基础理化特性、燃烧特性差异及掺烧比影响,以及掺烧后对灰渣特性的影响。研究发现,生活垃圾和工业固废理化特性差异明显,工业固废组分更为单一,以纺织废物为主(22.9%~72.0%),热值(9 121.2~14 975.8 kJ/kg)和挥发分比例(44.9%~71.8%)更高,其掺烧所引入的S和Cl等污染元素将为后续烟气污染物治理带来一定挑战。燃烧特性测试结果表明,工业固废纺织类占比较大,造成了其着火温度较高,但燃尽温度与着火温度的温差较小,即点燃后燃烧反应迅速且时间较短。系列热重分析结果表明,生活垃圾和工业固废的最佳掺烧比为1.00∶1.35,相应着火温度、燃烧速率温度和燃尽温度均低于生活垃圾,可燃性指数C(2.73×10-5 %·min-1·℃-2)和燃烧特性指数S(4.34×10-8 %2·min-2·℃-3)亦达到最高水平。在实际生活垃圾焚烧炉运行中,大比例掺烧工业固废(MSW∶ISW=1∶1)和提高工业固废掺烧比(MSW∶ISW=1.0∶1.5)会提高炉渣热灼减率,显著扩大水平烟道和布袋飞灰粒径,降低飞灰熔融特征温度,且S/Cl污染元素增多会导致钙剂吸收剂用量剧增造成飞灰增容现象。该研究结果可为后续生活垃圾焚烧系统大比例协同处置工业固废的稳定运行及工艺优化提供理论依据。

关键词: 生活垃圾焚烧, 工业固废掺烧, 掺烧比, 燃烧特性, 灰渣特性

Abstract: Taking Shaoxing municipal solid waste (MSW) and industrial solid waste (ISW) as the research objects, focused on the key and difficult problems of the large co-incineration proportion of ISW in MSW incineration system, the physical and chemical characteristics, the difference of combustion characteristics, the influence of the co-incineration ratio,and the influence of combustion on ash and slag characteristics of MSW and ISW were studied by combining the laboratory simulation and actual incineration system co-incineration test. It was found that the physical and chemical characteristics of MSW and ISW were significantly different, and ISW had more single composition, mainly textile waste (22.9%-72.0%), higher calorific value (9 121.2-14 975.8 kJ/kg) and volatile contents (44.9%-71.8%). And the pollution elements such as S and Cl introduced by ISW would bring certain challenges to the subsequent treatment of flue gas pollutants. The test results of combustion characteristics showed that the textile proportion of ISW was relatively large, resulted in higher ignition temperature, but a small temperature difference between the burnout temperature and the ignition temperature, that is, the combustion reaction after ignition was rapid and the time was short. The results of thermogravimetric (TG) analysis showed that the optimal co-incineration ratio of MSW and ISW was 1.00∶1.35, and the corresponding ignition temperature, combustion rate temperature and burnout temperature were lower than those of MSW, the flammability index C (2.73×10-5 %·min-1·℃-2) and combustion characteristic index S (4.34×10-8 %2·min-2·℃-3) also reached the highest level. In the operation process of MSW incinerator, a large co-incineration proportion of ISW (MSW∶ISW=1∶1) and increasing the ISW co-incineration ratio (MSW∶ISW=1.0∶1.5) would increase the slag thermal reduction rate, significantly expand the particle size of fly ash in the horizontal flue and bag, and reduce the characteristic melting temperature of fly ash. In addition, the increased contents of S/Cl also led to the increase of calcium absorbent dosage, resulting in more production of fly ash. The research results could provide a theoretical basis for the stable operation and technical optimization of the subsequent large-proportion co-disposal of ISW in MSW incineration system.

Key words: municipal solid waste incineration, industrial solid waste co-incineration, co-incineration ratio, combustion characteristics, ash and slag characteristics

[1] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[2] 陈明曦, 卢永明, 王 健, 张 劲, 王孝峰, 周 顺, 葛少林, 李爱民, 姬国钊. 卷烟燃烧过程减害降焦研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 77-86.
[3] 陈 璐, 杨德坤, 龙吉生. 一体化烟气净化工艺对生活垃圾焚烧厂多污染物协同脱除特性的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 51-57.
[4] 黄 华, 黄正鹏, 沈元鹏, 李 浓. 生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液全量化处理技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 78-82.
[5] 陆广博, 罗院生, 艾 扬, 李 松. 北京市某生活垃圾焚烧厂应急处置涉疫生活垃圾案例分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 45-49.
[6] 李唯实, 文卓钰, 李 丽, 闫大海, 黄启飞. 热处理法降解生活垃圾焚烧飞灰中二噁英的技术现状[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 128-128.
[7] 孙子维, 张雨轩, 唐玉婷, 王思琪, 唐杰洪, 马晓茜. 城市生活垃圾与陈腐垃圾掺烧的燃烧特性与反应动力学分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 1-10.
[8] 栗 博, 高 蕾, 茹春云, 韩志明, 刘玉坤. 垃圾焚烧飞灰水洗过程模拟及洗失率计算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 80-84.
[9] 缪 巍, 夏 宇, 张永禄, 王松涛, 陈运启, 陈则良. 生活垃圾焚烧厂第三方监管模式及未来发展趋势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 88-93.
[10] 秦 浩, 马长永. 生活垃圾渗滤液膜浓缩液全量化处理工艺应用分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 108-112.
[11] 龙吉生, 杨文妍, 张会妍. 垃圾焚烧厂ACC系统对锅炉运行主要参数的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 49-54.
[12] 石凯军, 蹇瑞欢. 现有生活垃圾焚烧厂掺烧工业固废及其垃圾池管理分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 28-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[2] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[3] 王晓燕 胡昌夏 徐利奇 等. 扫路机扫(吸)净率、作业扬尘试验方法对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 43 -45 .
[4] 王玉婧 邵立明 何品晶. 除臭剂效果评价实验方法研究与应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 46 -48 .
[5] 田 锐 吴 津 田启超 等. 垃圾气力输送过程中垃圾在弯管段的运动特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 52 -55 .
[6] 贾 悦. 基于BP神经网络模型的城市生活垃圾组分预测研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 84 -86 .
[7] 路鹏张全红张英杰陈英龙张晓辉曹奇光张爱佳魏鑫宇魏继宗王一妍任丽梅李松张健. 生活垃圾焚烧底渣水泥固化工艺初探[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 1 -4 .
[8] 王科林. 成都市市政污水污泥处理现状及可持续发展对策[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 23 -25 .
[9] 汤晓艳金慧宁屈阳李晨彬赵爽张进锋. 一种餐厨垃圾浆液的CSTR厌氧反应器处理试验研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 36 -40 .
[10] 崔华胜王晓燕冯伟孙晨阳. 袋式真空吸尘器与水过滤式真空吸尘器道路尘土收集方法对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 48 -51 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发