环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 80-84.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.06.013

• 危险废物利用、处理与处置 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾焚烧飞灰水洗过程模拟及洗失率计算

栗 博,高 蕾,茹春云,韩志明,刘玉坤   

  1. 北京中科润宇环保科技股份有限公司
  • 出版日期:2024-01-05 发布日期:2024-01-05

Simulation of MSWI Fly Ash Washing Process and Calculation of Washing Loss Rate

LI Bo, GAO Lei, RU Chunyun, HAN Zhiming, LIU Yukun   

  1. Beijing China Sciences Runyu Environmental Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-01-05 Published:2024-01-05

摘要: 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰是生活垃圾焚烧的烟气净化系统收集的颗粒物,含重金属和二 英等污染物,被列入《国家危险废物名录(2021版)》。在对飞灰进行熔融或者水泥窑协同等处置前需要进行水洗预处理以除去氯和其他可溶性盐。对垃圾焚烧飞灰进行水洗小试试验,得到飞灰水洗液并检测其成分。根据检测结果计算飞灰中可溶解性盐含量和飞灰水洗后的洗失率。结果表明,飞灰中可溶性盐含量为54.6%,主要为氯盐。水洗液中氯离子含量约为40 g/L,水洗可去除飞灰中大部分氯盐,但重金属去除效果较差。在液固比为6.5∶1.0(mL/g)的条件下,飞灰水洗洗失率达到40%以上。通过水洗前后干基飞灰质量对比和利用水洗液组成两种方法计算所得洗失率结果吻合,证明了在工程实践中,利用水洗液组成估算飞灰洗失率从而为工程设计提供依据的方法可行。

关键词: 生活垃圾焚烧, 飞灰;水洗液;无机盐;洗失率

Abstract: Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash is a particulate matter collected by the air pollution control system, containing pollutants such as heavy metals and dioxins, which was listed in the National Hazardous Waste List (2021 edition). Water washing was required to remove chlorine and other soluble salts before the fly ash was melted or treated in a cement kiln. A small-scale test of water washing was carried out on waste incineration fly ash. The solution after washing was obtained and its composition was detected. According to the test results, the soluble salt content in fly ash and the washing loss rate of fly ash after washing were calculated. The experimental results showed that the soluble salt content in fly ash was 54.6%, and the main component was chlorine salt. The chloride ion content was the highest in the solution, which was about 40 g/L. Washing could remove most of the chlorine salts in fly ash, but the removal of heavy metals was poor. Under the condition of liquid-solid ratio of 6.5∶1.0 (mL/g), the washing loss rate of fly ash water reached more than 40%. The results of the washing loss rate calculated by the mass loss of dry based fly ash before and after washing and the composition of solution after water washing were consistent, which proved that the method of estimating the wash loss rate of fly ash by the composition of water wash solution was feasible in engineering practice.

Key words: municipal solid waste incineration, fly ash, washing solution, inorganic salt, washing loss rate

[1] 缪 巍, 夏 宇, 张永禄, 王松涛, 陈运启, 陈则良. 生活垃圾焚烧厂第三方监管模式及未来发展趋势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 88-93.
[2] 秦 浩, 马长永. 生活垃圾渗滤液膜浓缩液全量化处理工艺应用分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 108-112.
[3] 龙吉生, 杨文妍, 张会妍. 垃圾焚烧厂ACC系统对锅炉运行主要参数的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 49-54.
[4] 石凯军, 蹇瑞欢. 现有生活垃圾焚烧厂掺烧工业固废及其垃圾池管理分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 28-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发