环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 102-109.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.05.013

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

大型生活垃圾焚烧设施烟气常规污染物协同控制及系统优化研究

郑仁栋,王国斌,刘红玉,王 聪,周纬南,应雨轩   

  1. 1. 杭州临江环境能源有限公司;2. 浙江工业大学
  • 出版日期:2026-10-29 发布日期:2026-10-29

Synergistic Control and System Optimization for Flue Gas Conventional Pollutants from Large-scale Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Facility

Zheng Rendong, Wang Guobin, Liu Hongyu, Wang Cong, Zhou Weinan, Ying Yuxuan   

  1. 1. Hangzhou Linjiang Environmental Energy Co. Ltd.; 2. Zhejiang University of Technology
  • Online:2026-10-29 Published:2026-10-29

摘要: 针对生活垃圾焚烧烟气排放标准持续趋严及常规污染物协同控制需求,以处理规模为5 200 t/d的垃圾焚烧发电项目为研究对象,系统分析了烟气从锅炉出口至烟囱全过程的污染物迁移转化及协同脱除机制。基于在线监测数据,对颗粒物、SO2、HCl及NOx的脱除特性进行定量评估,并探讨烟气净化系统中脱酸工艺调控、余热梯级利用及飞灰源头减量的协同优化路径。结果表明,多单元耦合净化系统可实现颗粒物、SO2、HCl及NOx的高效协同去除,去除效率分别达到99.9%、99.0%、99.9%以上及80.0%,排放浓度显著低于地方超低排放限值;“半干法为主、干法调节、湿法兜底”的脱酸策略可有效降低Ca(OH)2过量投加,飞灰产生率稳定控制在2%左右;通过构建GGH与SGH耦合的烟气余热梯级利用体系,SCR系统蒸汽消耗降低约82.6%,单位烟气节电约0.044 kWh/m3。研究表明,垃圾焚烧烟气治理应从单一污染物控制向多种污染物协同控制与能效优化耦合方向发展,所提出的系统优化路径可为大型垃圾焚烧项目超低排放改造提供工程参考。

关键词: 生活垃圾焚烧, 烟气净化, 协同控制, 超低排放, 飞灰减量

Abstract: In response to increasingly stringent emission standards and the demand for normal pollutant synergistic control in municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), a large-scale waste-to-energy plant with a capacity of 5 200 t/d was taken as an research object. And the migration, transformation, and synergistic removal mechanisms of flue gas pollutants from the boiler outlet to the stack were systematically analyzed. Based on continuous emission monitoring data, the removal characteristics of particulate matter, SO2, HCl, and NOx were quantitatively evaluated, and the coordinated optimization path of acid removal process control, waste heat cascade utilization, and fly ash source reduction was explored. The results showed that the multi-stage coupled purification system could achieve high-efficiency synergistic removal of pollutants, with removal efficiencies of above 99.9%, above 99.0%, above 99.9% and 80.0% for particulate matter, SO2, HCl, and NOx, respectively, and emission concentrations were significantly lower than local ultra-low emission limits. The deacidification strategy of “mainly based on semi-dry method, with dry method regulation and wet method as the bottom line” could effectively reduce excessive Ca(OH)2 addition, maintaining the fly ash generation rate at around 2%. Furthermore, by constructing a cascade utilization system of flue gas waste heat coupled with GGH and SGH, the steam consumption of the SCR system was reduced by approximately 82.6%, corresponding to an electricity saving of approximately 0.044 kWh/m3 of flue gas. This study demonstrated that flue gas treatment in MSWI plants should shift from single-pollutant control to a coupled approach integrating multi-pollutant synergistic removal and energy efficiency optimization. The proposed system optimization strategy provides practical guidance for ultra-low emission retrofits of large-scale MSWI facilities.

Key words: municipal solid waste incineration, flue gas purification, collaborative control, ultra-low emission, fly ash reduction

[1] 宋景全, 程亚军, 历 涛, 权小松, 刘宇南. 基于炉排速度与料层厚度动态耦合的实时燃烧调整方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(5): 96-101.
[2] 徐海云, 陆家纬, 尹水娥, 刘 涛, 张 媛, 苑 峥, 刘慧超. 偏远地区生活垃圾小型焚烧技术的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(4): 18-24.
[3] 陈 璐, 宫 锐, 杨德坤. 小苏打干法脱除生活垃圾焚烧烟气中 HCl 和 SO² 试验研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(4): 25-31.
[4] 冯 至, 吴 珣, 吴 越, 曹展硕, 许陆飞, 马砚池, 张辉宇. 碱激发生活垃圾焚烧底灰胶凝材料的反应机制与性能研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(3): 34-44.
[5] 刘广涛. 触媒陶纤管耦合活性炭吸附高效脱除垃圾焚烧烟气中二 英类的中试研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(3): 62-69.
[6] 赵 磊, 杨留锋, 胡良宽, 王 磊, 田立先, 薛文雅. 生活垃圾焚烧厂 SNCR 脱硝系统高效复合控制方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(3): 70-76.
[7] 胡斯怡, 王 宁, 张 浩, 杨 涛, 蔡嘉瑞, 安钊辉, 龙吉生, SCHWARZBÖCK Therese, FELLNER Johann, 李晓东. 垃圾焚烧发电厂入炉垃圾碳源在线监测方法及其示范应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 1-9.
[8] 崔超现, 马兆军, 赵鑫磊, 史 萌, 陈 宣, 张 胜, 陈荣杰, 张衍国. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰和赤泥协同熔融处理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 81-87.
[9] 李 新, 路 畅, 林剑平, 朱恩林. 垃圾焚烧炉内干法与传统脱酸工艺协同运行技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 88-93.
[10] 韩 亮, 陈 牧, 刘 瑜, 汪守康, 黄群星, 林晓青, 余 泓. 多污染物超低排放协同优化系统的设计与实现[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 108-114,123.
[11] 刘庄泉. 中小型餐厨垃圾协同处置设计与工程实践[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 70-74.
[12] 方凯乐, 周 强, 汪 军, 冯 至, 吴 珣. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣在混凝土中资源化利用的研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 38-45.
[13] 邱清文. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰填埋场岩土工程设计建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[14] 段盼巧, 李雅昕, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧厂白烟来源及控制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[15] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发