环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 9-16.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.04.002

• 危险废物利用、处理与处置 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾焚烧飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物的重金属污染特征及环境风险评估

田 伟,陈 琮,彭 莉,陈玉成   

  1. 1. 重庆市市政环卫监测中心;2. 西南大学 资源环境学院
  • 出版日期:2024-08-30 发布日期:2024-08-30

Pollution Characterization and Environmental Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal of Waste Incineration Fly Ash and its Solidified / Stabilized Products

TIAN Wei, CHEN Cong, PENG Li, CHEN Yucheng   

  1. 1. Chongqing Municipal Environmental Sanitation Monitoring Centre; 2. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University
  • Online:2024-08-30 Published:2024-08-30

摘要: 垃圾焚烧飞灰的无害化处置是垃圾焚烧污染控制的关键环节。选取典型垃圾焚烧厂的飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物,对比分析飞灰固化/稳定化前后的重金属含量、形态、浸出特性及微观形貌的变化,同时采用潜在环境风险评价法和环境风险指数法来评估固化/稳定化处理前后重金属的污染风险差异。结果表明:重庆市垃圾焚烧飞灰中Zn、Pb和Cu含量较高,尤其是Pb的浸出毒性达到标准限值的80.8倍,且Pb、Cu、Zn、As和Hg显示出较强的迁移性;固化/稳定化处理显著降低了重金属的浸出毒性和迁移性,但Pb的浸出毒性仍超标;环境风险评估表明,固化/稳定化处理后飞灰的环境污染风险显著降低,但Pb和Cd的处理效果仍需改进。研究成果可为飞灰处置技术优化提供重要数据支撑。

关键词: 垃圾焚烧, 飞灰, 重金属, 固化/稳定化, 环境风险评估

Abstract: The harmless disposal of waste incineration fly ash is the key link in the pollution control of waste incineration. Fly ash and its solidification/stabilization products from typical waste incineration plants were selected to compare and analyze the changes of heavy metal content, morphology, leaching characteristics and micro-morphology of fly ash before and after solidification/stabilization. Meanwhile, the potential risk evaluation method and environmental risk index method were used to evaluate the pollution risk differences of heavy metals before and after solidification/stabilization treatment. The results showed that the content of Zn, Pb and Cu in fly ash from waste incineration in Chongqing was high, especially the leaching toxicity of Pb reached 80.8 times of the standard limit value, and the migration of Pb, Cu, Zn, As and Hg was strong. Solidification/stabilization treatment significantly reduced the leaching toxicity and mobility of heavy metals, but the leaching toxicity of Pb still exceeded the standard. The results of the environmental pollution risk suggested that the environmental pollution risk of fly ash after solidification/stabilization treatment was significantly reduced, but the treatment effect of Pb and Cd still needs to be improved. The research results could provided crucial data support for the optimization of fly ash disposal technology.

Key words:  waste incineration, fly ash, heavy metals, solidification/stabilization, environmental risk assessment

[1] 邱清文. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰填埋场岩土工程设计建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[2] 胡洪磊, 龙吉生, 吴亚中. 垃圾焚烧项目烟气再循环设备腐蚀原因与优化方案[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 97-101.
[3] 段盼巧, 李雅昕, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧厂白烟来源及控制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[4] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[5] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[6] 夏 青, 徐孝健, 张虞婷, 周呈亚, 刘海春. 扬州家庭厨余垃圾重金属赋存特征与风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 50-54.
[7] 刘自兴, 王艳明, 王世豪, 聂剑文, 薛 骁, 高 斌. 飞灰酸洗减量化及低温热解解毒工艺初探[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 103-109.
[8] 段飞飞, 朱传强, 杨 林, 扈明东, 尹晓龙, 韩 昊. 大容量垃圾焚烧炉内脱硫脱硝一体化工艺研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 64-69.
[9] 龚 越. 面向垃圾焚烧余热锅炉受热面的超频震波清灰技术应用与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 74-79.
[10] 甘 洁, 刘 豪, 李建辉. 国内外生活垃圾焚烧厂的水排放与监管标准比较分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 11-16.
[11] 徐 垚, 张亚雷, 周雪飞. 城市化粪池粪便污泥基本物料特性及潜在环境风险[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 17-23.
[12] 雒 宇, 孙翰林, 康敏娟, 李厚恩. 青岛某工业园区重点监管企业土壤重金属污染特征及源解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 28-35.
[13] 余亚萍. 污泥焚烧烟气脱酸工艺技术经济分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 87-92.
[14] 商卫纯, 王丽晓, 郑 吉, 刁鲁懿. 浙江省某非正规垃圾填埋场调查及风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 99-103,111.
[15] 吕烨佳, 张 佳, 岳 阳, 钱光人. 焚烧飞灰深度资源化技术进展及展望(封面文章)[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发