环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 84-89.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.03.013

• 固体废物处理过程衍生污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

填埋场生活垃圾焚烧飞灰的土力学特性

邱清文   

  1. 1. 上海市环境工程设计科学研究院有限公司;2.上海环境卫生工程设计院有限公司
  • 出版日期:2024-07-02 发布日期:2024-07-02

Geotechnical Properties of Domestic Waste Incineration Fly Ash from Landfill

QIU Qingwen   

  1. 1.Shanghai Institute of Environmental Engineering and Design Science Co. Ltd.; 2. Shanghai Environmental Sanitation Engineering Design Institute Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-07-02 Published:2024-07-02

摘要: 我国生活垃圾焚烧飞灰逐年增加,大部分进入填埋场处置。然而关于飞灰的土力学特性研究相对较少,不利于指导飞灰填埋作业。对我国南方某填埋场稳定化焚烧飞灰的土力学特性进行了测试,并与前人的研究结果进行对比和分析。研究结果显示:生活垃圾焚烧厂原状飞灰属于级配良好粉土,经药剂、石灰、水泥稳定化固化处理后,颗粒大小逐渐增加,变为级配不良的粉砂、粗砂,甚至砂砾。不同填埋场飞灰的土力学特性差异较大,压缩系数αv1-2为0.26~2.96 MPa-1,压缩性等级为中等到高等级,黏聚力为8.00~19.47 kPa,摩擦角为32.5°~36.3°,重度为11.0~16.3 kN/m3。

关键词: 稳定化焚烧飞灰, 土力学特性, 压缩系数, 黏聚力, 摩擦角

Abstract: The amount of fly ash from domestic waste incineration is increasing year by year, with the majority being disposed of in landfills. However, the research on the soil mechanical characteristics of fly ash was relatively few, which was not conducive to guiding the landfill operation of fly ash. The geotechnical properties of stabilized incineration fly ash from a landfill in south China were tested, and were compared with the results of previous studies. The results indicated that the original fly ash from the municipal solid waste incineration could be classified as well-graded fine soil. After being stabilized and solidified by chemicals, lime, and cement, the particle size gradually increased and transformed into poorly graded fine sand, coarse sand, or even gravel. The geotechnical properties of fly ash in different landfills showed significant variation. The compression coefficient αv1-2 of fly ash from different landfills ranged from 0.26 to 2.96 MPa-1. The compressibility grade was medium to high. The cohesion force was 8.00 to 19.47 kPa, the friction angle was 32.50~36.30, and the unit weight was 11.0 to16.3 kN/m3.

Key words: stabilized incineration fly ash, geotechnical properties, compression coefficient, cohesive force, friction angle

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发