环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 23-36.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.02.004

• 固体废物处理过程衍生污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于相关技术指南的土壤背景数据分布检验与土壤基线确定研究——以上海市西北某区域实测数据为例

朱 悦,刘 顺,韩 燕,朱 颜,周 铭,赵俊明,张颖纯,何品晶   

  1. 1. 同济大学 环境科学与工程学院;2. 上海市环境科学研究院;3. 上海第二工业大学 资源与环境工程学院;4. 华东师范大学 生态与环境科学学院
  • 出版日期:2026-04-28 发布日期:2026-04-28

Distribution Test of Soil Background Data and Baseline Determination Based on Relevant Technical Guidelines: A Case Study of Northwestern Shanghai

ZHU Yue, LIU Shun, HAN Yan, ZHU Yan, ZHOU Ming, ZHAO Junming, ZHANG Yingchun, HE Pinjing   

  1. 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University; 2. Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences; 3. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University; 4. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University
  • Online:2026-04-28 Published:2026-04-28

摘要: 土壤基线值的确定是生态环境损害鉴定评估的关键环节,其准确性直接影响到污染责任认定与生态环境损害鉴定评估结果。本研究基于GB/T 39791.4—2024生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 总纲和关键环节 第4部分:土壤生态环境基线调查与确定,以上海市西北某区域土壤实测数据为例,系统开展了土壤背景数据分布检验与基线确定研究。通过对不同深度土层(表层、浅层、深层)中pH、有机质、重金属等14项指标的统计分析,综合运用Shapiro-Wilk检验、图形法(直方图、Q-Q图、P-P图)和Dixon异常值检验等方法,明确了各指标的数据分布类型,并据此计算了相应的土壤生态环境基线值。研究结果表明:砷、锌等指标在表层呈现非正态分布,反映出外源污染输入的特征;镉、汞在浅层非正态分布提示污染物可能存在垂向迁移与富集行为;深层土壤多数指标呈正态分布,代表了自然本底水平。本研究还发现pH宜采用中位数而非标准推荐的参考值上限作为基线,以避免误判。研究结果为城市建筑垃圾等污染场地的生态环境损害鉴定提供了科学依据,突出了地块特异性基线的重要性,并对GB/T 39791.4—2024的实际应用提出了优化建议。

关键词: 土壤基线值, 数据分布检验, Shapiro-Wilk检验, 正态分布, 异常值

Abstract: The determination of soil baseline values is a critical step in the identification and assessment of ecological environmental damage, as its accuracy directly influences the attribution of pollution responsibility and the outcomes of ecological environmental damage assessments. Guided by GB/T 39791.4—2024 Technical Guidelines for Identification and Assessment of Environmental Damage: General Principles and Key Procedures: Part 4: Investigation and Determination of Soil Environmental Baseline, this study systematically investigated the distribution test of soil background data and the determination of baseline values, using measured soil data from a specific area in northwestern Shanghai as a case study. Through statistical analysis of 14 indicators, including pH, organic matter, and heavy metals, across different soil depths(surface, shallow, and deep layers), and by comprehensively applying methods such as the Shapiro-Wilk test, graphical methods(histograms, Q-Q plots, P-P plots), and Dixon outlier test, the data distribution types for each indicator were clarified, and corresponding baseline values for the soil ecological environment were calculated. The results indicated that indicators such as As and Zn exhibited non-normal distributions in the surface layer, reflecting characteristics of exogenous pollution input. The non-normal distributions of Cd and Hg in the shallow layer suggested potential vertical migration and enrichment behaviors of pollutants. Most indicators in the deep soil layers showed normal distributions, representing the natural background levels. This study also found that for pH, the median was more appropriate than the upper limit of the standard-recommended reference value as the baseline to avoid misjudgment. The findings provide a scientific basis for the identification of ecological environmental damage in urban construction waste and other contaminated sites, highlighting the importance of site-specific baselines, and offering optimization suggestions for the practical application of GB/T 39791.4—2024.

Key words: soil baseline values, data distribution test, Shapiro-Wilk test, normal distribution, outliers

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[5] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[6] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[7] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[8] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[9] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
[10] 吴 剑 蹇瑞欢 刘 涛. 我国生活垃圾焚烧发电厂的能效水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 39 -42 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发