环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 17-23.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.03.003

• 固体废物处理过程衍生污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

存量垃圾快速好氧稳定化恶臭污染物变化规律模拟试验研究

郑嘉毅,阮兆康,杜海珊,吴耀光   

  1. 1. 广州环保投资集团有限公司;2. 广州环投环境服务有限公司;3. 华南理工大学;4. 广州市环境保护科学研究院有限公司
  • 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-06-30

Experimental Simulation Study on the Variation Law of Malodorous Pollutants During Rapid Aerobic Stabilization of Aged Municipal Solid Waste

ZHENG Jiayi, RUAN Zhaokang, DU Haishan, WU Yaoguang   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Environmental Protection Investment Group Co. Ltd.; 2. Guangzhou Grandtop Environmental Service Co. Ltd.; 3. South China University of Technology1; 4. Guangzhou Research Institute of Environmental Protection Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-06-30

摘要: 为降低生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾开挖时的环境异味与安全风险,同时克服传统好氧稳定化技术耗时较长的缺陷,本研究以华南某大型生活垃圾填埋场填埋龄约5~10 a的存量垃圾为样本,构建实验室快速好氧环境模拟小试装置。采用15 L/min和10 L/min两种空气流速的反应罐,并使用AERMOD大气扩散模型进行模拟分析,系统研究快速好氧处理过程中恶臭污染物变化规律及扩散特征。结果表明:结合填埋场现场检测数据,确定氨气为快速好氧预处理的代表性污染物;氨气浓度变化呈现“初期快速下降、后期趋稳、停机回升”的变化趋势,这归因于好氧处理在不同阶段对氨气的特定降解作用。AERMOD模型模拟显示,氨气在主导扩散方向上10、100、300 m处衰减后比例分别达到93%、23%、6%,随着距离的增加,衰减速度显著减缓;氨气溶解度远高于其他恶臭污染物,易随水分迁移扩大污染范围。基于研究结果,建议优先选择15 L/min及以上通气速率,至少间歇性通气1 344 h,初期以通风为主、后期辅助除臭措施,通气时增设干燥装置。通过以上措施可有效提高填埋场存量垃圾开挖前预处理的好氧稳定化效果,并进一步防止异味扩散。

关键词: 存量垃圾, 快速好氧稳定化, 预处理, 填埋气, 恶臭污染物, AERMOD模型

Abstract: To mitigate the environmental odorous and safety risks during the excavation of aged municipal solid waste (MSW) in landfills, and to address the long processing duration drawback of conventional aerobic stabilization technologies,the aged MSW with a landfill age of approximately 5 to 10 years from a large-scale MSW landfill in South China was taken as the research sample, and a small-scale laboratory device for rapid aerobic environment simulation was constructed. Using reaction tanks with air flow rates of 15 L/min and 10 L/min, and the AERMOD atmospheric dispersion model was applied for simulation analysis to systematically investigate the variation laws and diffusion behaviors of malodorous pollutants during the rapid aerobic stabilization process. The results indicated that based on on-site monitoring data of the landfill, ammonia was identified as the representative pollutant for rapid aerobic pretreatment. The ammonia concentration exhibited a variation trend of “rapid decline in the initial phase, stabilization in the later phase, and rebound after shutdown”, which was attributed to the stage-specific degradation effect of aerobic treatment on NH3. AERMOD model simulation results showed that the post-attenuation ratios of ammonia at distances of 10 m, 100 m, and 300 m along the dominant diffusion direction were 93%, 23%, and 6%, respectively, with the attenuation rate slowing significantly as the distance increased. The solubility of ammonia was much higher than that of other malodorous pollutants, making it prone to migrate with moisture and expand the pollution scope. Based on these findings, it was recommended to prioritize an aeration rate of 15 L/min or higher, maintain intermittent aeration for a minimum of 1 344 hours, enhance ventilation in the initial phase and supplementary deodorization measures in the later phase and install drying devices during aeration. These measures could effectively improve the aerobic stabilization efficiency of the pretreatment process prior to aged waste excavation in the landfill and further mitigate the diffusion of odorous pollutants.

Key words: aged municipal solid waste, rapid aerobic stabilization, pretreatment; landfill gas, malodorous pollutants, AERMOD model

[1] 吴 越, 吴 珣, 冯 至, 倪 政, 张辉宇, 曹展硕, 谷英东. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰用作无机胶凝材料研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(3): 89-97.
[2] 马 晴, 高孟姗, 吉星星, 延一鸣, 崔理慧, 马英群. 预处理技术强化秸秆生物转化进展、挑战与未来[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 43-55.
[3] 刘庄泉. 中小型餐厨垃圾协同处置设计与工程实践[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 70-74.
[4] 方凯乐, 周 强, 汪 军, 冯 至, 吴 珣. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣在混凝土中资源化利用的研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 38-45.
[5] 曹占强. 存量垃圾快速好氧稳定化装备研究及工程应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 75-81.
[6] 夏 旻, 吴 军, 余书瑶, 陈轶凡, 潘周志, 吉心瑶. 生活垃圾填埋场原位好氧稳定技术系统设计和工程应用进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 84-94.
[7] 元妙新, 葛恩燕, 占 升, 徐华锺, 陈 欢. 垃圾填埋场快速通风预处理的工艺设计及探索[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 95-101.
[8] 吉星星, 延一鸣, 陈佳新, 费 强, 汪群慧, 马英群. 纸类废弃物生物处理技术现状、挑战与未来[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 57-66.
[9] 秦胜男. 湿垃圾浆液制备碳源预处理组合技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 57-63.
[10] 梁智飞, 祝雄涛. 注氧稳定化预处理技术在生活垃圾卫生填埋场存量垃圾开挖中的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 90-95.
[11] 肖 绎, 贾维健. 北京市生活垃圾甲烷控制状况与综合利用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 9-15.
[12] 蒋微微, 杨 虹, 印健翔. 动物无害化处理厂恶臭污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 68-78,86.
[13] 淦方茂, 金 攀, 虞文波, 郭 帅, 惠二青, 杨家宽. 不同通风模式下生活垃圾填埋稳定化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 83-89.
[14] 董成耀, 顾 霞, 赵 磊, 周永泉, 李 响. 餐厨垃圾厌氧生物转化预处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 24-32.
[15] 张秉昕, 高 明, 唐卫奇, 王晓娜, 吴川福, 汪群慧, 张少明, 陈献锟. 生物质预处理提高炭基固体酸催化剂酯化效率的本质机理[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 127-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发