环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 106-113.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.05.015

• 环境卫生管理与评价体系 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海公共厕所精细化管理初步研究

单福征   

  1. 上海环境卫生工程设计院有限公司
  • 出版日期:2025-10-27 发布日期:2025-10-27

Preliminary Study on Refined Management of Public Toilets in Shanghai

SHAN Fuzheng   

  1. Shanghai Environmental Sanitation Engineering Design Institute Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2025-10-27 Published:2025-10-27

摘要: 随着社会经济的发展和“厕所革命”的推进,城镇公厕的保洁和服务水平受到广泛关注。以上海市中心城区(黄浦区)和郊区(嘉定区)为研究范围,采用明察暗访相结合的方式,选取5大类230个社会公厕样本进行调研和分析,其中有效点位为150个,并依据《2023年社会公厕监测评价表》中的评价指标对厕所样本进行打分。结果显示:上海市社会公厕整体保洁和服务水平良好,总分为86.3,服务优良率达79.3%。其中,公园类公厕表现最为优异,得分为91.8,而酒店类公厕得分最低(78.1)。研究发现,公厕在设计上存在性别差异,男女厕位比例为1.0∶1.4,黄浦区女厕位数量最多,平均达到5.16个,反映出女性使用厕所的需求更大。同时,研究还发现上海市中心城区的商场类和娱乐设施类公厕在服务水平和设施配置上领先于郊区,而郊区的公园类公厕则更为突出,体现了地域的差异性。此外公厕建设在精细化程度上存在不足,尤其是在信息公示、无障碍设施、雨雪天气安全警示设施、禁烟标志设置以及男女指示牌等方面。本研究聚焦于城镇公厕精细化管理水平的评估和提升,通过调研与数据分析,提出了针对性的改进建议,以期为上海市公厕服务的进一步优化提供参考。

关键词: 公共厕所, 监测, 评价, 精细化管理, 性别差异

Abstract: With the development of social economy and the promotion of “toilet revolution”, the cleaning and service level of urban public toilets has been widely concerned. Taking the central urban area (Huangpu district) and the suburban area (Jiading district) of Shanghai as the research scope, a combination of open inspections and unannounced visits was adopted. 230 samples of 5 types of public toilet were selected for investigation and analysis, among which 150 were valid points. The toilet samples were scored according to the evaluation indicators in the 2023 Social Public Toilet Monitoring and Evaluation Form. The results showed that the overall cleaning and service level of public toilets in Shanghai was good, with a total score of 86.3 and an excellent service rate of 79.3%. Among them, public toilets in parks performed the best, with a score of 91.8, while those in hotels had the lowest score of 78.1. The study found that there were gender differences in the design of public toilets. The ratio of male to female toilets number was 1.0∶1.4, and the number of female toilets in Huangpu district was the largest, with an average of 5.16, reflecting the greater demand for women to use toilets. Meanwhile, the study also found that the public toilets in shopping malls and recreational facilities in the central urban area of Shanghai were ahead of suburban areas in terms of service level and facility configuration, while the public toilets in parks in the suburbs were more prominent, reflecting the regional differences. In addition, there were deficiencies in the refinement of public toilet construction, especially in aspects such as information publicity, barrier-free facilities, safety warning facilities for rainy and snowy weather, the setting of no-smoking signs, and male-female signboards.This study focused on the evaluation and improvement of the refined management level of urban public toilets. Through investigation and data analysis, the targeted improvement suggestions were proposed, aiming to provide a reference for the further optimization of public toilet services in Shanghai.

Key words: public toilet, monitoring, evaluation, refined management, gender difference

[1] 缪周伟. 沿海地区垃圾填埋场污染评价与治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 75-82.
[2] 陶爽奕, 陈英健, 杜 倩, 杨家宽. 基于生命周期的含铁污泥热解资源化新工艺环境影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 18-27,37.
[3] 丁雨晴, 郭燕秋, 甘佳敏, 蒋 俊, 高岳毅, 陈 妍, 严 婷. 区域视角下高校实验室安全风险评价体系构建[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 19-26.
[4] 施至理. 小型简易垃圾填埋场开挖筛分工艺流程分析和参数确定——以浙江某小型简易垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 102-109.
[5] 刘云松, 李 莎, 唐圆圆. 多种指数在底泥潜在风险元素生态风险评价中的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 116-123.
[6] 李国庆. 基于黑水虻虫卵自供给的养殖优化及经济效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 50-56.
[7] 段盼巧, 刘晶昊, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧项目可靠性评价分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 112-116.
[8] 柳 青, 马云峰, 陈潇玲, 李文翰, 许 辉, 靳翔蛟, 易 鹏. 浅析省域生活垃圾焚烧企业精细化管理影响因素——以浙江省为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 110-116.
[9] 王天娇, 李 敏, 王 乾, 苗宪宝, 徐 林, 李义华. 生活垃圾焚烧、填埋及污水处理中长时间碳排放水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 75-84.
[10] 杜石峰, 韩振华, 罗 毅, 尹俊钦, 徐明琛, 汤建化. 基于多场所下的城市环境卫生质量评价模型研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 110-115.
[11] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[12] 朱永正, 陈亚南, 肖好磊, 黄泽海, 何 鑫. 长春市周边公路沿线农田土壤多环芳烃污染特征及风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 93-98.
[13] 卢 豪, 戚玉丽, 祝梦圆, 魏 彪. 多省份城乡“厕所革命”进展调研分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 9-14.
[14] 刘云松, 郭允允, 张健帅, 曾 辉, 唐圆圆. 河道底泥重金属固化研究进展及现状分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 69-78.
[15] 李水坤, 吴远明, 范家荣, 卢加伟. 超大城市再生资源回收的调查分析——以深圳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[2] 吴 剑 蹇瑞欢 刘 涛. 我国生活垃圾焚烧发电厂的能效水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 39 -42 .
[3] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 陈日晖. 北京市智慧环卫平台建设思路探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 91 -93 .
[6] 胡涛钱萌孙国芬简思平周吉利. 城市生活垃圾产生量预测研究——以南方某市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 36 -38 .
[7] 钱春军 赵由才. 新型路基箱铺设机械装置的研制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 56 -59 .
[8] 高凯敏 董玉锋. 3种填埋气收集井运用特点的论述[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 70 -72 .
[9] 董 辉. 老港综合填埋场生活垃圾填埋运行现状及成本分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 78 -80 .
[10] 贾宝桐1,蹇瑞欢1,周 文2,李 敏2. 垃圾焚烧电厂的飞灰稳定化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(5): 38 -40 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发