环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 18-27,37.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.04.003

• 固体废物处理生命周期评价与碳足迹 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生命周期的含铁污泥热解资源化新工艺环境影响研究

陶爽奕,陈英健,杜 倩,杨家宽   

  1. 1. 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司;2.华中科技大学 环境科学与工程学院;3.华中科技大学 长江流域多介质污染协同控制湖北省重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2025-08-28 发布日期:2025-08-28

Research on the Environmental Impact of a New Pyrolysis Resource Utilization Process for Iron-Containing Sludge Based on Life Cycle

TAO Shuangyi, CHEN Yingjian, DU Qian, YANG Jiakuan   

  1. 1. Changjiang Survery, Planning, Design and Research Co. Ltd.; 2. School of Environmental Science & Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Multi-media Pollution Cooperative Control in Yangtze Basin, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-08-28

摘要: 市政污泥脱水是一项世界性难题。Fenton调理技术因其能有效实现污泥深度脱水而受到广泛关注。针对Fenton污泥调理技术产生的大量富铁污泥处理难等问题,前期研发了污泥富铁生物炭污泥调理脱水-土地利用新工艺。以该新工艺为研究对象,运用生命周期评价方法分析其环境影响。研究结果表明:与Fenton碱性废渣污泥调理脱水-填埋工艺相比,新工艺对全球暖化潜能、酸化潜值、富营养化潜值、可吸入无机物和生态毒性等5类环境影响均有显著改善,分别减少了75.12%、44.26%、4.96%、22.86%和63.92%。通过对各环境影响结果进行标准化计算,发现新工艺总环境影响潜值可降低25.89%,说明富铁污泥热解资源化新工艺具有较好的环境效益。

关键词: 市政污泥, Fenton调理技术, 污泥资源化, 污泥富铁生物炭, 生命周期评价

Abstract: Sludge dewatering remains a global environmental challenge in wastewater treatment. Fenton conditioning technology has attracted widespread attention for its exceptional dewatering efficiency, while significant quantities of iron-rich sludge has been generated during the process, which requiring sustainable management solutions. To address this issue, a new process of iron-rich biochar sludge conditioning and dewatering-land application has been developed in the previous study. Taking this new process as the research object, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)method was used to analyse the environmental impacts. The research results showed that compared with the Fenton red mud sludge conditioning and dewatering-landfill process, the new process has significantly improved the five types of environmental impacts, namely global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, inhalable inorganic substances and ecotoxicity, which were reduced by 75.12%, 44.26%, 4.96%, 22.86% and 63.92%, respectively. Through standardized calculation of various environmental impact results, it was found that the total environmental impact potential value of the new process could be reduced by 25.89%, indicating that the new process of pyrolysis and resource utilization of iron-rich sludge has better environmental benefits.

Key words: sewage sludge, Fenton conditioning technology, sludge recycling, iron-rich sludge biochar, life cycle assessment

[1] 左 壮, 张琛玥, 喻 武, 闵加栋, 王元月. 不同来源污泥碟片陶瓷膜错流过滤效果研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 32-39.
[2] 彭 岱, 邓金环, 宁寻安, 陈嘉宜, 叶文盛, 张鼎元. 市政污泥与铁尾矿协同磁化焙烧回收铁资源的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 17-22.
[3] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[4] 许 鹏. 市政污泥干化焚烧能量平衡分析及工程设计应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 41-45.
[5] 淦方茂, 吴莉鑫, 虞文波, 胡 广, 惠二青, 郭 帅. 村镇生活垃圾不同处置模式下温室气体排放潜力对比研究——以湖北埠河镇为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 112-118.
[6] 赵宇轩, 魏国侠, 刘汉桥, 赵海龙, 李 通, 龚永月, 乔浩宇. 两种医疗废物应急协同处置技术的生命周期评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 58-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[2] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[3] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[4] 吴 剑 蹇瑞欢 刘 涛. 我国生活垃圾焚烧发电厂的能效水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 39 -42 .
[5] 陈日晖. 北京市智慧环卫平台建设思路探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 91 -93 .
[6] 吴龙张谌郝以党胡天麒. 生活垃圾资源化利用价值分析及处理工艺探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 19 -22 .
[7] 刘兰英陈丽向奕锦. 满足GB 16889—2008的填埋场渗沥液处置工艺探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 31 -35 .
[8] 杨伟魏建民梁静波袁珊珊张学民钱华山余芬芬. 垃圾气力输运管线运移规律研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 73 -76 .
[9] 蒋宇. 成都市中心城区生活垃圾收集点现状分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 87 -89 .
[10] 王文祥李宝花梁展星方红生黄玲李慧颖. 垃圾焚烧厂飞灰金属溶出特性研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 43 -47 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发