Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 57-67.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Release Characteristics and Health Risks of Bioaerosol from Initial Degradation of Campus Food Waste

LIU Yanjun, TANG Qiange, WANG Sheng, LI Zhenkun, WANG Jianbing   

  1. School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

Abstract: The unorganized release of bioaerosols from campus food waste posed a potential threat to the health of campus students and staff. In this study, an Anderson six-stage sampler and a medium-flow total suspended particulate sampler were used to collect air samples from the temporary storage process of food waste in the campus. The culturable and non-cultureable bioaerosols were analyzed by culture techniques and high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that food waste was an important source of bioaerosol release, and the concentration of fungi (224.78±27.69) CFU/m3 in bioaerosol was higher than that of bacteria (116.95±23.01) CFU/m3 and environmental background. That is, the bacterial environmental background value was (32.80±3.61) CFU/m3, and the fungal environmental background value was (54.57±17.24) CFU/m3. In terms of particle size distribution, bacterial aerosols were mainly distributed in stage I (≥7.0 μm), and fungal aerosols were in stage IV (2.1~3.3 μm). The dominant phylum of bacterial aerosols mainly included Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. The former had a higher aerosolization level. The dominant phylum of fungal aerosols mainly included Ascomycota and Basidiomycetes, both of which were easily aerosolization. In terms of health risks, the non-carcinogenic health risk of both breathing and skin-contact were within the maximum acceptable level set by the US EPA. However, the annual exposure risk and disease burden of Pseudomonas and Fusarium were higher than the corresponding limits.

Key words: food waste, bioaerosol, community structure, aerosolization index, health risk

[1] WANG Huihui, WANG Ling, ZHU Minhang, LIAN Songjian. Analysis on Current Situation and Processing Costs of Food Waste Treatment Facilities in China [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 12-18.
[2] WANG Yujie, QIU Junjie, LYU Fan, ZHANG Hua, HE Pinjing. Bottlenecks in Scaling up Lactate-mediated Carbon Chain Elongation for Caproate Production [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 27-36,48.
[3] XIA Qing, XU Xiaojian, ZHANG Yuting, ZHOU Chengya, LIU Haichun. Occurrence Characteristic and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Yangzhou Household Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(2): 50-54.
[4] WANG Yiran, MENG Xingyao, LI Jinglin, WANG Pan, REN Lianhai. Research Status of Malodorous Gas Emissions During the Aerobic Composting Process of Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(1): 40-49,56.
[5] LI Guoqing. Optimization of Breeding and Economic Benefit Analysis Based on Self-supply of Black Soldier Fly Eggs [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 50-56.
[6] SHANG Yijun, LI Xunan, LIU Yan, CHEN Yongjie, YUAN Wei, LU Jianhong. Research Progress on the Growth and Reduction of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Aerobic Compost of Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 80-89.
[7] ZHANG Li, LI Ke, ZHU Yaping, WU Yuan, YANG Hujun. Preparation of Carbon Source by Food Waste Dish Separation and Its Application [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 62-66.
[8] ZHOU Yongquan, LI Xiaowei, TAI Jun. The Effects of Low-dosage Paper Addition on Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Kitchen Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 36-43.
[9] OUYANG Chuang, ZHANG Yurong, TAI Jun, XU Xianbao, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. Comparative Study on Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Enhanced by Biogas Residue Hydrochar and Biogas Residue Pyrochar [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(3): 47-53.
[10] JIANG Weiwei, YANG Hong, YIN Jianxiang. Odor Pollution Characterization and Health Risk Assessment of An Animal Innocuous Treatment Plant [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 68-78,86.
[11] ZHANG Dong. Analysis of Carbon Emissions in Different Treatment Process of Three-phase Organic Residues from Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 104-109.
[12] ZHU Yuanchao, ZHAO Zimin, ZHANG Jinsong. Caculation of Carbon Emission During Co-composting of Food Waste and Agricultural Waste and Garden Waste: A Case Study of A Treatment Facility in Town [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 111-115.
[13] DU Xuexun, SHI Jingjing, ZHANG Siying. Study on Bioaugmentation to Promote Methanogenic Performance of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 46-53.
[14] QI Guangxia, LIU Zhengyang, XIA Yi, CHEN Sihan, HU Jinhui , REN Lianhai. The Impact of Physical Composition on the Composition and Emission Characteristics of Odorous Pollutants During Food Waste Composting [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 54-62.
[15] MENG Wei, YU Chao, FAN Xiaoping, LIU Yan, CHU Shaohan, SU Hongyu. Design and Operation Examples of Typical Food Waste Treatment Project in Southeast Coastal Area of China [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 28-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech