Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 29-35.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.04.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Biochar from Two Kinds of Municipal Organic Solid Waste

MA Xiang, CHEN Ping, LIANG Jing   

  1. Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning
  • Online:2024-08-30 Published:2024-08-30

Abstract: There is a huge amount of organic solid waste resources such as kitchen waste anaerobic fermentation biogas residue and garden waste in China. Pyrolysis carbonization is an effective way to recycle organic solid waste. The yield, physical and chemical properties and structural characterization of pyrolysis biomass char from different biomass raw materials still need to be systematically studied. The kitchen waste anaerobic fermentation biogas residue and garden waste were used as raw materials, the physical and chemical properties such as nutrient content, microstructure, functional groups, and structural characteristics of two kinds of solid waste pyrolysis biochar were analyzed. The biogas residue biochar yield and garden waste biochar yield were 62.7% and 70.1%, respectively. The pH values were 9.61 and 10.01, and the electrical conductivity were 1.25, 0.55 mS/cm, respectively. The total nutrient content were 6.26% and 4.63%, and the fixed carbon content were 54.80% and 67.90%, respectively. The specific surface area of biogas residue biochar was basically the same as that of garden waste biochar(with values of 7.73, 8.03 m2/g, respectively), and pore volumes of 0.025, 0.011 cm3/g, with pore sizes of 10.14, 4.70 nm, respectively. There were significant differences in the types of functional groups between the two types of biochar, with biogas residue biochar had more functional groups than garden waste biochar, but the crystal structures of the two were basically the same. Both biogas residue and garden waste could be used to produce biochar-based fertilizers, but the nutrient content and pore structure of biogas residue biochar were better than those of garden waste biochar, which could be used to improve soil comprehensive fertility. The organic carbon content of garden waste biochar was higher, which was beneficial for increasing soil carbon sink.

Key words: biogas residue of kitchen waste, garden waste, pyrolysis carbonization, biochar, structural characterization

[1] CHEN Haibin, YANG Lijie, XU Xiaoxiao, GUO Shuai, LIANG Sha, YANG Jiakuan. Experimental Study on Collaborative Composting of Garden Waste and Perishable Waste in Rural Areas [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 40-45.
[2] LAN Yuanyuan, WU Song, WANG Lei. Study of Material Conditioning Alleviating Acidification Effect in Anaerobic Fermentation of Restaurant Food Waste and Its Mechanism [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(4): 27-34.
[3] ZHU Yue, HE Pinjing, ZHANG Hua. Generation and Utilization of Garden Waste in Shanghai: Status Quo, Challenges and Countermeasures Analysis [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(3): 15-23.
[4] SONG Lijie, TAI Jun, XIA Min, ZHANG Ai. Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Sludge-based Biochar to Enhance Waste Activated Sludge Lysis Efficiency [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(2): 88-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Status Evaluation of Groundwater Quality of A Waste Landfill Site in Tongliao   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] . Analysis on Characteristics of Stench and Effect of Different Deodorization Processes in Domestic Refuse Transfer#br# Station   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] . Stress Analysis of Steam-water Pipes and Optimized Design of Support-hangers in Waste Incineration Power Plant   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[5] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[6] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
[7] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 90 -94 .
[8] . Environmental Impact Analysis of Three Typical Sludge Treatment Processes[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 12 -14 .
[9] . Study on Enrichment Rule of Soluble Salts in the Process of Incineration Fly Ash Treatment by Melting Method[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 15 -19 .
[10] . Effect of Nozzle Blocking on Deacification Efficiency in a Wet-deacification Tower[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 20 -24 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech