环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 29-35.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.04.005

• 有机固废生物处理与高值化利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种城市源有机固体废物生物质炭理化特性研究

马 想,陈 平,梁 晶   

  1. 上海市园林科学规划研究院
  • 出版日期:2024-08-30 发布日期:2024-08-30

A Study on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Biochar from Two Kinds of Municipal Organic Solid Waste

MA Xiang, CHEN Ping, LIANG Jing   

  1. Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning
  • Online:2024-08-30 Published:2024-08-30

摘要: 我国厨余垃圾厌氧发酵沼渣和园林废弃物等有机固体废物资源量巨大,热解炭化是对有机固体废物进行资源化处置的有效途径,不同生物质原料热解生物质炭得率、理化性质和结构表征还需系统研究。以厨余垃圾厌氧发酵沼渣和园林废弃物为原料,分析两种固体废物热解生物质炭的养分含量、微观结构、官能团种类等理化性质及结构特点。沼渣生物质炭和园林废弃物生物质炭得率分别为62.7%、70.1%,pH分别为9.61、10.01,电导率分别为1.25、0.55 mS/cm,总养分含量分别为6.26%、4.63%,固定碳含量分别为54.80%、67.90%。沼渣生物质炭比表面积与园林废弃物生物质炭基本一致(分别为7.73 、8.03 m2/g),孔容分别为0.025、0.011 cm3/g,孔径分别为10.14、4.70 nm。两种生物质炭官能团种类具有较大差异,沼渣生物质炭官能团较园林废弃物生物质炭更为丰富,但两者晶体结构基本一致。沼渣和园林废弃物均可用于生产生物炭基肥料,但沼渣生物质炭养分含量和孔隙结构优于园林废弃物生物质炭,可用于土壤综合肥力提升,园林废弃物生物质炭有机碳含量更高,有利于增加土壤碳汇。

关键词: 厨余垃圾沼渣, 园林废弃物, 热解炭化, 生物质炭, 结构表征

Abstract: There is a huge amount of organic solid waste resources such as kitchen waste anaerobic fermentation biogas residue and garden waste in China. Pyrolysis carbonization is an effective way to recycle organic solid waste. The yield, physical and chemical properties and structural characterization of pyrolysis biomass char from different biomass raw materials still need to be systematically studied. The kitchen waste anaerobic fermentation biogas residue and garden waste were used as raw materials, the physical and chemical properties such as nutrient content, microstructure, functional groups, and structural characteristics of two kinds of solid waste pyrolysis biochar were analyzed. The biogas residue biochar yield and garden waste biochar yield were 62.7% and 70.1%, respectively. The pH values were 9.61 and 10.01, and the electrical conductivity were 1.25, 0.55 mS/cm, respectively. The total nutrient content were 6.26% and 4.63%, and the fixed carbon content were 54.80% and 67.90%, respectively. The specific surface area of biogas residue biochar was basically the same as that of garden waste biochar(with values of 7.73, 8.03 m2/g, respectively), and pore volumes of 0.025, 0.011 cm3/g, with pore sizes of 10.14, 4.70 nm, respectively. There were significant differences in the types of functional groups between the two types of biochar, with biogas residue biochar had more functional groups than garden waste biochar, but the crystal structures of the two were basically the same. Both biogas residue and garden waste could be used to produce biochar-based fertilizers, but the nutrient content and pore structure of biogas residue biochar were better than those of garden waste biochar, which could be used to improve soil comprehensive fertility. The organic carbon content of garden waste biochar was higher, which was beneficial for increasing soil carbon sink.

Key words: biogas residue of kitchen waste, garden waste, pyrolysis carbonization, biochar, structural characterization

[1] 朱 悦, 何品晶, 章 骅. 上海市园林废弃物产生与利用现状、难点及对策分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 15-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[5] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[6] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
[7] 杨磊锋杨非邢家乐李加文. 垃圾气力输送管路特性参数试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 90 -94 .
[8] 刘 静 祁洪刚. 3种典型污泥处理工艺环境影响分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 12 -14 .
[9] 王建伟 朱 杰 朱雁鸣 等. 熔融法处理垃圾焚烧飞灰过程中可溶盐富集规律研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 15 -19 .
[10] 安 淼 金玉婷 尹丽洁. 湿法脱酸塔内喷嘴堵塞对脱酸效率的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 20 -24 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发