环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.001

• 城乡生活垃圾填埋与二次污染控制 •    下一篇

渣土填埋场滑坡风险等级评估——以杭州某渣土场为例

张 帅,王帅茸,雷孟麟,代 聪,詹良通   

  1. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-01

Landslide Risk Level Assessment of A Landfill:A Case Study of A Landfill in Hangzhou

ZHANG Shuai, WANG Shuairong, LEI Menglin, DAI Cong, ZHAN Liangtong   

  1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

摘要: “渣土围城”是我国城镇化发展以来最大的障碍之一,渣土场滑坡给周边环境带来了极大的安全隐患。针对渣土场滑坡风险评估的复杂性,建立了一种渣土场滑坡风险等级评估方法,该方法以定性和半定量的方式将渣土自身特性和滑坡特点考虑在滑坡风险评估的各个物理过程中,构建边坡安全系数与失稳概率等级的对应关系,将边坡失稳概率等级与危害性等级分为极高、高、中、低4级,并建立4×4的风险等级矩阵;提出贯穿渣土场建设全过程的滑坡风险管控对策,涉及渣土场选址、建设和治理、监测和预警、应急响应4个部分;以杭州某渣土场为例详细说明该方法在实际场地中的应用,通过对研究区域进行边坡稳定性分析、运移距离估计和危害性结果统计,评估了该渣土场在堆填结束后的滑坡风险等级。

关键词: 渣土场, 滑坡, 边坡稳定性, 风险评估, 风险管控

Abstract: “Waste soil siege” is a major obstacle to rapid urbanization in China, posing potential safety hazards to the surrounding environment due to the landslide of landfills. In terms of the complexity of the landslide risk assessment of landfills, a method to evaluate the landslide risk level of landfills was proposed. In this method, the characteristics of waste soil and landslides were considered in each physical process of landslide risk assessment in a qualitative and semi-quantitative way. The method established a corresponding relationship between the slope safety factor and the failure probability grade, which divided the failure probability and damages of the landfill slope into four grades of extremely high, high, medium, and low, meanwhile, a risk level matrix of 4×4 was established. Landslide risk control countermeasures for the entire process of landfill construction were proposed, including site selection, construction and management, monitoring and early warning, as well as emergency response. A landfill in Hangzhou was taken as an example to illustrate the application of this method in an actual site. Through the slope stability analysis, migration distance estimation, and damage result statistics of the study area, the landslide risk level of the landfill after the filling was evaluated.

Key words: landfill, landslide, slope stability, risk assessment, risk control

[1] 田 伟, 陈 琮, 彭 莉, 陈玉成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物的重金属污染特征及环境风险评估[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[2] 施瑾瑾. 开挖的非正规填埋场重(类)金属污染及潜在生态环境风险分析——以嘉善县某填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 78-83.
[3] 蒲红霞, 贺实月, 胡泸丹, 张旭晨, 张志军, 魏新庆. HDPE柔性垂直防渗技术在历史遗留废渣原位风险管控中的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 100-104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发