Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 28-37.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.04.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Carbon Emission Analysis of Typical Food Waste Resource Recovery Projects

LIU Rongjie, JIN Hong, XIAO Liqi, YIN Hanbing, ZHANG Lei   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Urban Management Education and Development Research Center, Shenzhen;2. Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School
  • Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-08-28

Abstract: Novel food waste treatment technologies have been successively developed and implemented, yet corresponding carbon emission studies remain insufficient. To quantify the carbon emission of food waste treatment, China’s first local standard DB4403/T 468—2024 Guidelines for Carbon Emission Accounting for Food Waste Treatment Projects was adopted to conduct a comprehensive carbon emission analysis. Five representative treatment approaches of typical projects were evaluated, including direct incineration with other waste, co-incineration after tri-phase separation, anaerobic digestion, black soldier fly rearing, fermentation to acid, encompassed scope 1 to 3 emissions and carbon offset components. The results showed that the net carbon emissions of the five projects (converted into CO2 equivalent, calculated as food waste), from low to high were anaerobic digestion (-90.82 kg/t), followed by fermentation to acid (-81.04 kg/t), co-incineration after tri-phase separation (-80.96 kg/t), black soldier fly rearing (-41.78 kg/t), and direct incineration with other waste (-3.01 kg/t). Carbon emission of scope 1 (0-52.43 kg/t) primarily attributed to direct discharge of food waste, wastewater and waste residue treatment. Carbon emission of scope 2 (19.32-67.17 kg/t) primarily attributed to the electricity consumption of food waste and wastewater treatment. Carbon emission of scope 3 (2.23-7.21 kg/t) primarily attributed to chemical inputs. Carbon offsets (-185.75 to -81.08 kg/t) derived from power generation (-123.75 to -81.08 kg/t), biodiesel production (-62.00 kg/t), bio-based carbon sources (-40.59 kg/t), organic fertilizer (-34.56 kg/t), feedstock materials (-19.80 kg/t). Technical recommendations for low-carbon development include enhancing gas control systems, optimizing energy mix, and improving resource recovery efficiency.

Key words:  food waste, treatment project, carbon emission, accounting method

[1] WANG Yujie, QIU Junjie, LYU Fan, ZHANG Hua, HE Pinjing. Bottlenecks in Scaling up Lactate-mediated Carbon Chain Elongation for Caproate Production [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 27-36,48.
[2] XIA Qing, XU Xiaojian, ZHANG Yuting, ZHOU Chengya, LIU Haichun. Occurrence Characteristic and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Yangzhou Household Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(2): 50-54.
[3] FU Kai, BAI Xu, SHI Jiayu, QIAN Xinxin, LIU Lu, ZHOU Yaqian, WANG Heli. Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Domestic Waste Incineration Based on the Entire Process [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[4] CI Hanlin, FANG Ning, GUO Yali, HUANG Jialiang, MEI Xiaojie, CHEN Fang, LI Jing. Selection of City Multi-source Organic Solid Waste Disposal Methods Based on Life-cycle Carbon Emission and Economic Cost Analysis [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 1-9.
[5] ZHOU Baiyu, REN Yi, DU Chunyan, ZHU Hao, CAO Limin, GUO Xuhui, CHEN Lijian, HAN Zhiyong. Carbon Emission and Carbon Peak Management Strategies for the Treatment and Disposal of Domestic Waste: Comparative Analysis Based on the Measured Data of Waste and Landfill Gas Production in Chengdu City [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 10-19.
[6] LI Jianying, REN Xiaoling, WANG Xiaoyan, LAI Jinli. Analysis and Research on Carbon Emissions Throughout the Life Cycle of Biodiesel Production from Kitchen Waste Oils and Fats [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 48-54.
[7] ZHOU Yongquan, LI Xiaowei, TAI Jun. The Effects of Low-dosage Paper Addition on Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Kitchen Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 36-43.
[8] PENG Xiaowei, TANG Yuting, ZHONG Rigang, YU Zhaosheng, LIN Yan, WU Hao. Competitive Analysis of Suitability for Garbage Transfer Trucks with Different Energy Types Under Carbon Emission Reduction Constraints:A Case Study of Shenzhen City [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(3): 1-8.
[9] OUYANG Chuang, ZHANG Yurong, TAI Jun, XU Xianbao, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. Comparative Study on Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Enhanced by Biogas Residue Hydrochar and Biogas Residue Pyrochar [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(3): 47-53.
[10] JIANG Yu, TAN Yaoyao, LI Dong, DENG Fang, CHEN Qiong, ZHENG Xiaoqian. Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Emission Reduction Strategies in the Field of Urban Management in Chengdu [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(2): 85-92.
[11] ZHANG Dong. Analysis of Carbon Emissions in Different Treatment Process of Three-phase Organic Residues from Food Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 104-109.
[12] ZHU Yuanchao, ZHAO Zimin, ZHANG Jinsong. Caculation of Carbon Emission During Co-composting of Food Waste and Agricultural Waste and Garden Waste: A Case Study of A Treatment Facility in Town [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 111-115.
[13] QI Guangxia, LIU Zhengyang, XIA Yi, CHEN Sihan, HU Jinhui , REN Lianhai. The Impact of Physical Composition on the Composition and Emission Characteristics of Odorous Pollutants During Food Waste Composting [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 54-62.
[14] BI Zhujie, TAI Jun, WANG Chuan. The Status and Prediction of Carbon Emission from Domestic Waste Treatment in Shanghai [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 1-8.
[15] HE Weiyu. Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Opportunities in Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Industry [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Optimization Study on Effect Evaluation Index for Source Separation of Municipal Solid Waste Based on F-measure   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] . Exploration and Research on Improving the Classification Effect of Domestic Garbage in Guangzhou   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] . Municipal Sewage Sludge Co-firing in Waste Incineration Power Plant: A Case Study of Hengyang City   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[4] . Study on Influencing Factors of Municipal Solid Waste Heating Value in Taiyuan   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[5] . Inhibition Concentration and Elimination Method of Ammonia Nitrogen in Anaerobic Digestion Process   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
[6] . Operation Management Acceptance and Detection Analysis of Closed Waste Cleaning Stations in Beijing   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 49 -51 .
[7] . Discussion on Optimum Design of UASB Reactor for Leachate   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 63 -67 .
[8] . Engineering Design of Construction Waste Reclamation in Daxing District of Beijing   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 71 -74 .
[9] . Technology Upgrading and Architectural Design on Relieving NIMBY Problem of MSW Incineration Power Plant in#br# Mingzhou of Ningbo   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 75 -77 .
[10] . Types and Application Conditions of Municipal Solid Waste Waterway Transportation at Home and Abroad   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 78 -83 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech