[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 112-120.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.04.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence Study of Leaching Methods on the Assessment of Heavy Metal Toxicity in Washed Fly Ash

Zheng Rendong, Liu Hongyu, Bian Junjin, Wang Guobin, Yu Jiahan   

  1. 1. Hangzhou Linjiang Environmental Energy Co. Ltd.; 2. Hangzhou Environmental Group Co. Ltd.; 3. Hangzhou Energy Group Co. Ltd.; 4. Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University
  • Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-08-25

Abstract: In this study, the three-stage countercurrent water-washing products of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash were taken as the research objects. Leaching tests were conducted respectively in accordance with three standard methods: HJ 557—2010 Solid Waste Extraction Procedure for Leaching Toxicity Horizontal Vibration Method, HJ/T 299—2007 Solid Waste Extraction Procedure for Leaching Toxicity Sulphuric Acid and Nitric Acid Method, and HJ/T 300—2007 Solid Waste Extraction Procedure for Leaching Toxicity Acetic Acid Buffer Solution Method. The leaching toxicity characteristics of heavy metals in water-washed fly ash under different leaching systems were compared and analyzed, and a simplified overall pollution toxicity index (OPTIs) was introduced to evaluate the environmental risks. The results indicated that the leaching efficiencies of Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Pb, and Ni under the acetic acid buffer solution method were significantly higher than those under the other two methods, with concentrations generally 1-2 orders of magnitude higher. Specifically, under the acetic acid method, the average leaching concentrations of Zn and Cd reached 14.00 mg/L and 1.23 mg/L, respectively, exceeding the grade I limits of GB 8978—1996 Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard by 6.0 and 11.3 times, respectively. In contrast, the concentrations detected via the horizontal vibration and sulfuric-nitric acid methods remained below the regulatory limits. The comprehensive toxicity evaluation identified Cd and Zn as the primary contributors to the leaching toxicity of washed fly ash, driven by the high ecological risk potential of Cd and the high leaching concentration of Zn. Although the current technical specification HJ 1134—2020 Technical Specification for Pollution Control of Fly-ash from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (for trial implementation) primarily relies on the horizontal vibration method for toxicity evaluation, washed fly ash still poses a risk of heavy metal migration under specific acidic scenarios. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate the acetic acid buffer solution method as a supplementary evaluation for extreme acidic scenarios in the environmental risk assessment of resource utilization of water-washed fly ash,and to establish a tiered assessment framework, providing a more robust scientific basis for the safe utilization of MSWI fly ash.

Key words:  washed fly ash, leaching methods, heavy metals, environmental risk

[1] Li Kejing, Ling Bo, Lu Huamei, Wu Zhibin, Luo Lin, Yang Yuan. Risk Assessment of Soil-groundwater Heavy Metal Pollution Characteristics in Two Valley-type Landfills in Hunan Province [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(4): 56-66.
[2] DENG Bing, BAI Bing, LI Yang. Study on Fractional Leaching Remediation of Agricultural and Mountain Soils Polluted by Atmospheric Deposition Heavy Metal [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(2): 37-41.
[3] ZHANG Xiao, WANG Zhongxia, LI Wenming. Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Groundwater in the Vicinity of Waste Incineration Plants [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(1): 109-117.
[4] LI Weishi, XU Siqi, YAN Dahai, MENG Lingyi, LONG Jie, XU Ya, HUANG Qifei, LI Li. Exploring Circular Pathways for Solid Waste Management Based on Technological Trends and Current Governance Practices [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(6): 15-27.
[5] LEI Chunrun, CHEN Xu, ZHANG Shaodong, ZHU Hao, FEI Yongqiang, WANG Yating, HAN Zhiyong. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Pollution Evaluation of Heavy Metals in the Soil of Different Types of Domestic Waste Dump Sites [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(6): 51-61.
[6] XU Yao, ZHANG Yalei, ZHOU Xuefei. Basic Material Properties and Potential Environmental Risks of Fecal Sludge from Urban Septic Tanks [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 17-23.
[7] SHANG Weichun, WANG Lixiao, ZHENG Ji, DIAO Luyi. Investigation and Risk Assessment of an Informal Landfill in Zhejiang Province [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 99-103,111.
[8] LYU Yejia, ZHANG Jia, YUE Yang, QIAN Guangren. Progress and Prospect of Deep Recycling Technology for Incineration Fly Ash [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 1-8.
[9] TIAN Wei, CHEN Cong, PENG Li, CHEN Yucheng. Pollution Characterization and Environmental Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal of Waste Incineration Fly Ash and its Solidified / Stabilized Products [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[10] HU Xiangyu, ZHANG Sheng, LIU Li, ZHAO Hairui , YAN Yangyang. Effects of Rural Organic Waste Composts on Soil-red Skin Radish System and Ecological Risk Assessment [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 44-50.
[11] SHI Jinjin. Analysis of Heavy Metal(Metalloid)Pollution and Potential Ecological Risk in Excavated Irregular Landfill Sites: A Case Study of a Landfill Site in Jiashan County [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(3): 78-83.
[12] LIU Yunsong, GUO Yunyun, ZHANG Jianshuai, ZENG Hui, TANG Yuanyuan. Research Progress and Status Analysis on Heavy Metal Immobilization in River Sediment [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(3): 69-78.
[13] MU Xiaozhan, GUO Tao, LI Ping, WANG Jianwei. Feasibility Analysis on Mixed Deacidifying Agent for the Deacidification of MSW Incineration Flue Gas [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(2): 82-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Engineering Characteristics of Bottom Ash in Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[2] . Inhibition Concentration and Elimination Method of Ammonia Nitrogen in Anaerobic Digestion Process   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
[3] . Research on Energy Efficiency of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant in China   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 39 -42 .
[4] . Comparison of Test Methods for Sweeping Efficiency and Sweeping Work on Raising Dust   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 43 -45 .
[5] . Technology Upgrading and Architectural Design on Relieving NIMBY Problem of MSW Incineration Power Plant in#br# Mingzhou of Ningbo   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 75 -77 .
[6] . Prediction Research on Physical Compositions of Municipal Solid Waste Based on BP Neural Network   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 84 -86 .
[7] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 73 -76 .
[8] . Research on Design Process of Synergistic Incineration of Sludge and Domestic Waste#br# ——Taking the Example of Co-incineration Project of Sludge and Domestic Waste in Songjiang District of Shanghai#br#[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 4 -8 .
[9] . Discussion on Application Characteristics of Three Landfill Gas Collecting Wells[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 70 -72 .
[10] . Research on Planning Strategy of Domestic Waste Management in Yinchuan[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 81 -83 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech