Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 55-61.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.04.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the Overall Planning and Operational Key Points of Decoration Waste Resource Utilization Project

ZHANG Xiaoxing   

  1. 1. Shanghai Yuexin Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd.; 2. Shanghai Kepin Renewable Energy Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-08-28

Abstract: Based on five typical construction and demolition waste recycling projects built and operated in Shanghai since 2018, combining with the operational practice, and from environmental protection, economic efficiency, and resource utilization perspectives, the elements of the overall planning and operation process of the construction waste resource utilization project were analyzed. The project focusing on renovation waste and considering demolition waste. The impact of the choice of processing objects and scale on the project’s environmental protection and economic efficiency, the impact of waste collection and transportation modes and the economic efficiency of recycled product applications on project site selection, and the key goals and production line setup points for project construction and operation were explored. Results showed that the planning and operation project of construction waste recycling facility should mainly focus on decoration waste, while also taking into account demolition waste. For the collection and transport of renovation waste within a 50 km service radius, a direct transport mode should be adopted, without intermediate transfer or sorting stations. Recycled aggregate typically accounted for 75% to 85%, and was primarily used as raw material for producing building materials like bricks and mortar. The longer the transportation distance for recycled aggregate, the higher the transportation cost would be and the lower the revenue from it. The proportion of sorted residues that need to be incinerated or landfilled was 10% to 25%. The number of vehicles required to be configured was a key determinant of transportation costs, which was determined by the transportation distance of the residues. Therefore, project site selection should be as close as possible to recycled aggregate application sites and residual waste disposal plants, and material utilization production facilities such as brick making and mortar should be set up within the plant if conditions permit. The key operational goals should include high quality of recycled aggregate, a high resource recovery rate and a low residue rate (under the resource utilization rates of 90% and 75%, the difference in combined product revenue and residue disposal cost results was 33.75 yuan/t in the net cost per ton of waste), effective control of dust and noise. During operation, economic calculations for renovation waste and demolition waste should be separately calculated and settled according to categories.

Key words: decoration waste, planning and operation, environmental protection, economy, processing object and scale, project site selection, resource utilization goal

[1] JI Xingxing, YAN Yiming, CHEN Jiaxin, FEI Qiang, WANG Qunhui, MA Yingqun. Current Status,Challenges and Perspectives of Paper Waste Biological Treatment Technologies [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(1): 57-66.
[2] SHI Qingyan, YU Yi, ZHOU Keren. Process Analysis and Prospect of the Decoration Waste Resource Utilization [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(3): 36-41.
[3] CHENG Wen, GENG Zhen, JIANG Lanlan. The Design of a Decoration and Renovation Waste Resource Utilization Project in Taihu Basin [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2022, 30(5): 94-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2020, 28(4): 95 -98 .
[2] ZHAO Xi, CAI Xiaowei, YU Cen, XIAO Yao, WEI Si. Comparative Study of Unintentional Emerging Pollutants from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration and Landfill[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 1 -11 .
[3] LI Yangqing, YU Sifu. Case Study on the Soil and Groundwater Restoration and Treatment Project of a Hazardous Waste Landfill Area[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 12 -17 .
[4] LIU Rongjie, JIN Hong, XIAO Liqi, YIN Hanbing, ZHANG Lei. Carbon Emission Analysis of Typical Food Waste Resource Recovery Projects[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 28 -37 .
[5] ZHANG Fei, LI Ling, YU Linfeng, XU Huazhong. Discussion on the Improvement and Optimization of Air Separation Technology and Equipment of Stale Waste[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 46 -54 .
[6] HAN Luxin, YAN Puhao, LIU Li, WANG Kainan. Development Evolution of the Technical Route of a Certain Kitchen Waste Treatment Plant in the Eastern Part of Beijing[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 86 -90 .
[7] YUE Xingyue. Application of Reheat Technology in Ultra-high Pressure Furnace in Waste Incineration Plant[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 99 -103 .
[8] ZHANG Qian, SUN Weirui. Phase I Project of Heze Construction Waste Recycling and Circular Economy Industrial Park[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 117 -119 .
[9] WANG Jialei, TANG Bo, MI Li, LI Min, ZHOU Wen. Engineering Project of Kitchen Waste Treatment and Resource Utilization in the Central Urban Area of Chengdu City[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 123 -125 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech