环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 1-9.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.03.001

• 固体废物处理过程衍生污染控制 •    下一篇

垃圾填埋场地下水污染分区协同治理技术及工程应用

姚 元,龙於洋,郑廷雨,叶 渊,朱 焰,刘玉涛,刘亚飞   

  1. 1. 森特士兴集团股份有限公司;2. 浙江工商大学 环境科学与工程学院
  • 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-06-30

Zoning Collaborative Treatment Technology and Engineering Application of Groundwater Pollution in Landfill Sites

YAO Yuan, LONG Yuyang, ZHENG Tingyu, YE Yuan, ZHU Yan, LIU Yutao, LIU Yafei   

  1. 1. Center International Group Co. Ltd.; 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University
  • Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-06-30

摘要: 填埋场地下水环境风险日益凸显,亟需针对性管控修复策略。本研究以华南某垃圾填埋场为例,按照污染源管控区、地下水治理区和地下水防控区分区协同管控修复,提出“污染源削减-渗漏途径阻隔-地下水修复-监测自然衰减”治理策略。结果表明:渗滤液抽排系统运行6个月后坝前区域液位降低3.2~3.4 m,污染源有效削减;坝肩注浆后渗透系数降至8.10×10-7~8.91×10-6 cm/s,阻断渗滤液扩散途径;地下水抽出处理系统运行3个月后,垃圾坝下游氨氮和COD去除率分别为77.3%~82.0%和75.8%~78.1%。抽出处理结束后地下水循环井系统运行3个月,氨氮和COD的去除效果分别提升了10.4~16.8个百分点和9.5~12.5个百分点;通过水力控制和监测自然衰减,对污染羽进行有效截获且污染物浓度持续下降。

关键词: 垃圾填埋场, 分区治理, 污染源削减, 渗漏路径阻隔, 地下水循环井

Abstract: The environmental risk of groundwater in landfills has become increasingly prominent, which requires targeted control and remediation strategies. In this study, a landfill site in South China was taken as an example. According to the zoning collaborative control and repair of pollution source control area, groundwater treatment area and groundwater prevention and control area, the control strategy of pollution source reduction, leakage path obstruction, groundwater remediation and monitoring natural attenuation was proposed. The results showed that after six months operation of the leachate drainage system, the liquid level in front of the dam decreased by 3.2-3.4 m, effectively reducing the pollution source. After grouting the dam abutment, the permeability coefficient decreased to 8.10×10-7-8.91×10-6 cm/s, blocking the diffusion pathway of leachate. After three months operation of the groundwater extraction treatment system, the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand downstream of the waste dam were 77.3%-82.0% and 75.8%-78.1%, respectively. After the completion of groundwater extraction treatment, the groundwater circulation well system operated for three months, and the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand increased by 10.4-16.8 percentage points and 9.5-12.5 percentage points, respectively. Through hydraulic control and natural attenuation monitoring, the pollution plume has been effectively intercepted and the pollutant concentration continuing to decline.

Key words: landfill, zoning governance, reduction of pollution sources, leakage path obstruction, groundwater circulating well

[1] 李娜英, 韩智勇, 郭南飞, 周志强, 刘 莹, 唐钱刚. 正规与非正规城市生活垃圾填埋场中微塑料的时空分布及塑料降解菌鉴定[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2026, 34(1): 127-127.
[2] 董军旗, 张贵宝, 厉江锋, 张才军, 罗娅琼, 项林凤, 曹 丽. 基于断裂带地层特性的填埋场复合防渗体系创新研究——以杭州天子岭为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 83-91.
[3] 曹占强. 存量垃圾快速好氧稳定化装备研究及工程应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 75-81.
[4] 施至理. 小型简易垃圾填埋场开挖筛分工艺流程分析和参数确定——以浙江某小型简易垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 102-109.
[5] 王心月, 黄兴瑶, 智 悦, 刘雪梅, 王 前, 岳东北, 王小铭. 食品接触材料全氟和多氟化合物浸出行为及其处置场景释放潜力研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 128-128.
[6] 陈 华, 何耀忠, 刘 帅, 刘 畅, 杨嘉杰. 大型生活垃圾填埋场阶段性封场综合整治工程——以广东省某市生活垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 93-98.
[7] 商卫纯, 王丽晓, 郑 吉, 刁鲁懿. 浙江省某非正规垃圾填埋场调查及风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 99-103,111.
[8] 项显超, 蔡嘉瑞, 甄宗傲, 李晓东. 填埋场开采及矿化垃圾资源化利用现状[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 16-27.
[9] 黄乃先, 陈 晨, 孔 斌. 用于陈腐垃圾处置的精细化筛分工艺——以某垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 9-13.
[10] 刘超然, 江文琛, 张海静, 王 磊, 黄 晟. 华东地区非正规垃圾填埋场开挖筛分治理工程案例分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 14-20.
[11] 占松林, 高 磊, 周克斌. 存量生活垃圾填埋场治理方式及商业模式的探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 11-15.
[12] 葛恩燕, 胡 超. 生活垃圾填埋场开采筛分处置技术研究——以卧旗山垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 88-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发