环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 1-8,13.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.02.001

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 •    下一篇

垃圾焚烧发电厂直接空冷凝汽器主要设计参数选择及优化研究

陈子华   

  1. 上海康恒环境股份有限公司
  • 出版日期:2026-04-28 发布日期:2026-04-28

Study on Selection and Optimization of Main Design Parameters of Direct Air-cooled Condenser of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Power Plants

CHEN Zihua   

  1. Shanghai SUS Environment Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2026-04-28 Published:2026-04-28

摘要: 直接空冷系统相比湿冷系统具有显著的节水优势,但效率低、初始投资较高是亟需解决的瓶颈问题。本研究以中亚某2×750 t/d+45 MW直接空冷机组垃圾焚烧发电厂为例,结合热力计算、变工况运行、年发电净收益及全生命周期收益最大法,形成了垃圾焚烧发电厂直接空冷系统ITD(汽机排汽压力对应的凝结水温度与设计环境温度之差)优化、主要设计参数选择及优化方法,以实现垃圾焚烧无害化处理、提高垃圾焚烧全生命周期净收益的双重目标。研究得到本项目最佳ITD值为18.97 ℃(设计环境温度35 ℃、排汽压力15 kPa)、迎风面风速为2.00~2.25 m/s、换热面积约为3.15×105 m2;研究结果表明环境温度超过一定值时,换热面积对环境温度、背压敏感程度变大;上网电价是影响垃圾焚烧发电厂ITD值的重要因素,且其较高时可提高凝汽器换热面积即选择较小的ITD值以实现年发电净收益及全生命周期收益最大化;ITD值随对其影响较大的敏感因素管束价格上升而增加;设计迎风面风速影响直接空冷系统设计换热面积及运行耗电量,且存在最佳值2.00~2.25 m/s使得年净收益最大化。相比火力发电厂,垃圾焚烧发电厂ITD值更低,且应更紧密地结合典型年气象参数,通过ITD优化和DL/T 5339—2018火力发电厂水工设计规范中推荐的直接空冷系统设计环境温度方法确定设计环境温度。

关键词: 垃圾焚烧发电厂, 直接空冷, ITD优化, 变工况运行

Abstract: Direct air-cooled condenser(DACC) system poses great advantage on water-saving compared to wet cooling system. However, lower efficiency and higher initial investment remain critical bottleneck issues that need to be addressed. A scale of 2×750 t/d municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) power plant with 45 MW turbine and generator unit in Central Asia was taken as an example, combined with thermal calculation, off-design conditions operation, and the maximum annual net power generation profit and profit of the whole life cycle method, initial temperature difference(ITD, namely the difference between the condensate temperature corresponding to exhaust pressure of the turbine and the design environment temperature) optimization, main design parameters selection and optimization method for DACC of waste incineration power plants were formed, in order to achieve the dual goals of harmless treatment of waste incineration and increase the net profit of the whole life cycle of waste incineration. Optimal ITD value of this project was obtained as 18.97 ℃ (design ambient temperature 35 ℃ and exhaust pressure 15 kPa), face velocity was 2.00-2.25 m/s and heat transfer area was approximately 3.15×105 m2. The research results showed that the increase rate of heat transfer area was sharply varied with the design ambient temperature and exhaust pressure when the design ambient temperature was higher than a certain value. And it also revealed that electricity sales price was one of the important factors of ITD and when it was at a higher level, it could increase the heat transfer area of condenser (that is, by choosing a smaller ITD value) to get maximum annual net profit and net profit of whole lifecycle. And the ITD value increased with the rise of the bundle price which was a significant ITD sensitive factor. Face velocity had a great influence on the heat transfer area and power consumption of fans and there was an optimal face velocity(2.00-2.25 m/s) to achieve maximum annual net profit. Compared with thermal power plants, ITD of MSWI plants was lower, and the design ambient temperature should be determined more closely in combination with typical annual meteorological parameters through ITD optimization and the design ambient temperature method for DACC recommended in DL/T 5339—2018 Code for Hydraulic Design of Fossil Fired Power Plant .

Key words: municipal solid waste incineration power plant, direct air-cooled condenser, ITD optimization, off-design conditions operation

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[5] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[6] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[7] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[8] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[9] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
[10] 吴 剑 蹇瑞欢 刘 涛. 我国生活垃圾焚烧发电厂的能效水平研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 39 -42 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发