环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 88-93.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.01.011

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾焚烧炉内干法与传统脱酸工艺协同运行技术研究

李 新,路 畅,林剑平,朱恩林   

  1. 1. 光大环保技术装备(常州)有限公司;2. 光大环保能源(衢州)有限公司
  • 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-02-28

Research on Synergistic Operation of In-furnace Dry Process and Conventional Deacidification Processes in Waste Incinerators

LI Xin, LU Chang, LIN Jianping, ZHU Enlin   

  1. 1. Everbright Environmental Protection Technology Equipment (Changzhou) Co. Ltd.; 2. Everbright Environmental Energy (Quzhou) Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 伴随日益严格的排放指标以及掺烧工业固废的处理要求,传统脱酸工艺面临负荷大、石灰利用率低、飞灰产生量增加及排放趋严等问题。本研究构建“炉内干法+半干法+湿法”三级协同脱酸体系,在原有工艺基础上新增炉内干法系统,通过动态调节钙硫比(Ca/S)探究耦合性能。结果表明:炉内干法对SO2、HCl脱除效率随Ca/S增加而提升(Ca/S=1.52时分别达89%、66%);合理控制Ca/S(0.8~1.0)可降低后续半干法浆液量及湿法碱液量,减少系统飞灰产生量(飞灰产生率由2.68%降至2.33%),降低脱酸总成本。以炉内干法200 kg/h脱硫剂喷入量为例,吨垃圾脱酸运行成本下降1.12元,每日飞灰处置费节省9 908元。研究证实,炉内干法作为前端工艺,通过高温快速反应与后端工艺协同,在保证排放达标的同时,实现了“减量-降本-增效”一体化,为掺烧工业固废的垃圾焚烧厂提供了高效、经济的烟气治理技术路径。

关键词: 焚烧炉, 炉内干法, 超低排放, 烟气处理

Abstract: With increasingly stringent emission standards and requirements for co-combustion of industrial solid waste, traditional deacidification processes face challenges such as high operational load, low lime utilization efficiency, increased fly ash generation, and tightening emission compliance pressures. This study established a three-stage collaborative acid gas removal system (furnace dry process + semi-dry process + wet process) by integrating a furnace dry process into the existing flue gas treatment process. The coupling performance was systematically investigated by dynamically adjusting the calcium-to-sulfur ratio (Ca/S). Results showed that the removal efficiencies of SO2 and HCl by the furnace dry process increased with rising Ca/S, reaching 89% and 66%, respectively, at Ca/S=1.52. Reasonable control of Ca/S (0.8-1.0) reduced the subsequent semi-dry process slurry volume and wet process alkali solution consumption, while decreasing system fly ash generation (fly ash rate reduced from 2.68% to 2.33%) and total acid gas removal costs. Taking the in-furnace dry process injection volume of 200 kg/h of desulfurizer as an example, the operational cost for acid gas removal per ton of waste decreased by 1.12 yuan, with daily fly ash disposal costs reduced by 9 908 yuan. This study demonstrates that the furnace dry process, as a front-end technology, achieves integrated “waste reduction, cost reduction, and efficiency enhancement” through high-temperature rapid reactions and collaboration with back-end processes,while ensuring compliance with emission standards. It provides an efficient and economical flue gas treatment solution for waste incineration plants co-incinerating industrial solid waste.

Key words:  waste incineration furnace, in-furnace dry process, ultra-low emission, flue gas treatment

[1] 韩 亮, 陈 牧, 刘 瑜, 汪守康, 黄群星, 林晓青, 余 泓. 多污染物超低排放协同优化系统的设计与实现[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(6): 108-114,123.
[2] 商 煜, 喻 武, 李豫军, 周 康, 李清海, 汪少娜. 基于时间序列神经网络模型预测垃圾焚烧炉运行参数的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 11-17.
[3] 黄行柱, 胡平宇, 容毅浜, 袁维芳, 白彩鹏, 蓝志聪, 陈 华. 生活垃圾焚烧炉结焦及其防治技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(5): 49-56,63.
[4] 方凯乐, 周 强, 汪 军, 冯 至, 吴 珣. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣在混凝土中资源化利用的研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(4): 38-45.
[5] 项一凡, 尚凡杰, 陈 涛, 汤绍富, 林 杰, 王 浩. 激光电离飞行时间质谱在线检测二噁英系统在某生活垃圾焚烧厂的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 86-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发