环境卫生工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1-11.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.05.001

• 环境卫生系统自动化、智能化、智慧化管理 •    下一篇

存量陈腐垃圾筛上物掺混焚烧适应性数值模拟研究

曲文浩,武先威,王 润,钟志刚,彭海超,张朋双,邱俊伟   

  1. 1.深圳能源环保股份有限公司;2.华南理工大学 电力学院
  • 出版日期:2026-10-29 发布日期:2026-10-29

Numerical Investigation into Co-firing Adaptability of Oversize Residues from Legacy Aged Stockpiled MSW

Qu Wenhao, Wu Xianwei, Wang Run, Zhong Zhigang, Peng Haichao, Zhang Pengshuang, Qiu Junwei   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Energy Environmental Protection Co. Ltd.; 2. School of Electric Power Engineering, South China University of Technology
  • Online:2026-10-29 Published:2026-10-29

摘要: 为评估存量陈腐垃圾筛上物(AG)在机械炉排垃圾焚烧炉中的协同焚烧适应性,以某850 t/d机械炉排炉为研究对象,建立FLIC-Fluent耦合模型,设置0~70%的AG掺混比例。对高热值生活垃圾(MSW-A)和普通热值生活垃圾(MSW-B)工况下的燃烧稳定性进行对比,并以MSW-A为代表进一步分析NOx生成与SNCR脱硝、飞灰冲蚀及高温氯腐蚀特性。结果表明,随着AG掺混比例增加,混合垃圾低位热值降低,着火位置后移,炉内温度和高温烟气停留时间下降,局部低温区扩大;优化二次风喷射角度可改善局部烟气混合和温度场均匀性。MSW-A工况下,NOx浓度随AG掺混比例增加而升高,该趋势与燃料氮输入增强的影响相一致,但本研究未定量区分不同NOx生成路径。在各工况依据850~1 050 ℃温度窗口选择相应喷枪层位后,采用15%氨水进行SNCR脱硝,模型预测的脱硝后NOx浓度均低于200 mg/m3,脱硝效率为31.5%~58.0%,其差异受温度场、喷枪层位及烟气混合条件共同影响。飞灰冲蚀主要集中于二烟道收缩段和三烟道后墙;AG掺混提高了烟气中HCl浓度,但炉温下降使部分壁面的预测腐蚀量降低,其中壁面3的腐蚀风险最高。综合燃烧稳定性、NOx控制、飞灰冲蚀和高温氯腐蚀等因素,在本研究炉型及燃料条件下,MSW-A工况下AG推荐掺混比例不超过30%;对于MSW-B,仅从燃烧稳定性和炉内高温燃烧条件考虑,AG掺混比例宜控制在20%以内。该研究结果主要用于不同AG掺混工况的相对趋势分析和工程风险筛选。

关键词: 陈腐垃圾掺烧, SNCR脱硝, 飞灰磨损, 高温酸腐蚀

Abstract: To assess the co-firing adaptability of the oversize fraction of aged landfill waste (AG) in a mechanical-grate municipal solid waste incinerator, a coupled FLIC-Fluent model was developed for an 850 t/d unit, with AG blending ratios ranging from 0 to 70%. Combustion stability was compared for co-firing AG with high-calorific-value municipal solid waste (MSW-A) and conventional municipal solid waste (MSW-B). Using MSW-A as the representative base waste, NOx formation and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), fly-ash erosion, and high-temperature chlorine corrosion were further investigated. The results showed that with the increase of AG blending ratio, the lower heating value of the mixed waste reduced, the ignition position delayed, the furnace temperature and high-temperature gas residence time decreased, and local low-temperature zones enlarged. Optimizing the secondary-air injection angle improved local gas mixing and temperature-field uniformity. For MSW-A, the increase in NOx concentration with AG blending was consistent with the enhanced influence of fuel-nitrogen input, but the contributions of individual NOx formation pathways were not quantitatively separated. After selecting the appropriate injection level for each case according to the 850-1 050 ℃ temperature window, SNCR using 15% aqueous ammonia resulted in model-predicted NOx concentrations below 200 mg/m3, with predicted removal efficiencies ranging from 31.5% to 58.0%. These differences were jointly affected by the temperature field, injection level, and gas-mixing conditions rather than directly caused by AG blending. Severe fly-ash erosion was mainly located at the contraction of the second flue and the rear wall of the third flue. Although AG blending increased the HCl concentration, the accompanying decrease in furnace temperature reduced the predicted corrosion rate on some heating surfaces, while Wall 3 exhibited the highest corrosion risk. Considering combustion stability, NOx control, fly-ash erosion, and high-temperature chlorine corrosion, the recommended AG blending ratio for MSW-A was no more than 30% under the investigated furnace and fuel conditions. For MSW-B, which was evaluated only in terms of combustion stability and high-temperature combustion conditions, the AG blending ratio should be limited to 20%. The results are intended for relative trend analysis and engineering risk screening under the investigated conditions.

Key words: co-combustion of aged stockpiled MSW, SNCR denitrification, fly ash abrasion, high-temperature acid corrosion

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发