Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 10-19.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.06.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Carbon Emission and Carbon Peak Management Strategies for the Treatment and Disposal of Domestic Waste: Comparative Analysis Based on the Measured Data of Waste and Landfill Gas Production in Chengdu City

ZHOU Baiyu, REN Yi, DU Chunyan, ZHU Hao, CAO Limin, GUO Xuhui, CHEN Lijian, HAN Zhiyong   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Chengdu University of Technology); 2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution (Chengdu University of Technology); 3. College of Environment and Ecology, Chengdu University of Technology; 4. Chengdu Textile College; 5. Chengdu Domestic Solid Waste Disposal Supervision Service Center; 6. Chengdu Institute of Urban Management Science
  • Online:2024-12-27 Published:2024-12-27

Abstract: In the context of the national development strategy of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, municipal solid waste management departments need to adopt carbon emission reduction models in waste management as an entry point and act proactively. Therefore, taking Chengdu as an example, this paper calculated a total of 2 780.40 Gg of carbon emissions would be generated in the domestic waste treatment process in Chengdu in 2021 according to the measured and domestic literature parameters. The net carbon emission rate for landfilling was 794.00 kg/t, while for incineration, it was 0.934 kg/t. By calculating the carbon emissions from landfills (excluding leachate treatment) and incineration (excluding leachate,fly ash,and slag treatment), it was found that the IPCC’s theoretical calculations were 34% and 53% higher than the measured values and the literature parameters, respectively. For food waste treatment, anaerobic digestion is more suitable than aerobic composting. Under the current scenario, Chengdu’s net carbon emissions in 2021 was 784.95 Gg/a, and the net carbon emissions in 2030 and 2060 would be 457.31 Gg/a and 246.26 Gg/a, respectively. The net carbon emission rate of “zero landfill+food waste aerobic composting+rest waste incineration power generation” scheme (Scenario 1) was 113.02 kg/t in the base year (2021), and the net carbon emission rate in 2030 and 2060 would be 57.83 kg/t and 27.01 kg/t, respectively. Using the “zero landfill+anaerobic fermentation of food waste+remaining waste incineration power generation”scheme (Scenario 2),the net carbon emission rate in the base year (2021) was 111.10 kg/t, and the net carbon emission rate in 2030 and 2060 would be 49.31 kg/t and 14.73 kg/t, respectively. The net carbon emission rate of the “zero landfill+anaerobic digestion of food waste+remaining waste incineration power generation+recyclable resource rebate” scheme (Scenario 3) was -156.10 kg/t in the base year (2021), and the net carbon emission rate in 2030 and 2060 would be -256.73 kg/t and -229.08 kg/t, respectively. Carbon emissions in the process of municipal solid waste treatment can be effectively reduced and carbon neutrality achieved through source reduction, classification collection and treatment, recycling of recyclable waste, anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste, incineration power generation of municipal solid waste, zero landfilling, and landfill gas collection and utilization.

Key words: municipal solid waste, treatment and disposal, carbon emissions, carbon neutral, management strategy

[1] DING Cong. Composition and Characteristics Analysis of Terminal Municipal Solid Waste of a City in South China in the Last Decade [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 36-40.
[2] LI Jianying, REN Xiaoling, WANG Xiaoyan, LAI Jinli. Analysis and Research on Carbon Emissions Throughout the Life Cycle of Biodiesel Production from Kitchen Waste Oils and Fats [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 48-54.
[3] HUANG Hua, HUANG Zhengpeng, SHEN Yuanpeng, LI Nong. Study on Full Quantification Treatment Technology of Leachate in Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 78-82.
[4] HUANG Shujuan, LI Hang. Study on the Methodology and Implementation Conditions of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Charge [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 105-111.
[5] JIANG Yu, TAN Yaoyao, LI Dong, DENG Fang, CHEN Qiong, ZHENG Xiaoqian. Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Emission Reduction Strategies in the Field of Urban Management in Chengdu [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(2): 85-92.
[6] ZHU Yuanchao, ZHAO Zimin, ZHANG Jinsong. Caculation of Carbon Emission During Co-composting of Food Waste and Agricultural Waste and Garden Waste: A Case Study of A Treatment Facility in Town [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 111-115.
[7] SUN Ziwei, ZHANG Yuxuan, TANG Yuting, WANG Siqi, TANG Jiehong, MA Xiaoqian. Combustion Characteristics and Kinetic Analysis of the Co-combustion of MSW and Excavated Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 1-10.
[8] CHANG Keke, LI Jian, CHEN Guanyi, DAN Zeng. Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste Gasification in Tibet Plateau [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 16-21.
[9] QI Guangxia, LIU Zhengyang, XIA Yi, CHEN Sihan, HU Jinhui , REN Lianhai. The Impact of Physical Composition on the Composition and Emission Characteristics of Odorous Pollutants During Food Waste Composting [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 54-62.
[10] LI Bo, GAO Lei, RU Chunyun, HAN Zhiming, LIU Yukun. Simulation of MSWI Fly Ash Washing Process and Calculation of Washing Loss Rate [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(6): 80-84.
[11] HE Weiyu. Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Opportunities in Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Industry [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[12] WANG Lei. Consideration on the Optimization Design of Waste to Energy Plants [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 51-59.
[13] GAO Chuanzuo, CHEN Tan, YANG Ting, ZHANG Bing. The Management Mode of Municipal Solid Waste in Xilinhot City [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(5): 106-114.
[14] MA Xingyu, WANG Tengxu, YANG Sicheng, GENG Chao, XUE Yuwei, LIU He. Issues and Recommendations for Municipal Solid Waste Regional Integrated Management in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(3): 79-87.
[15] SHI Kaijun, JIAN Ruihuan. Analysis of Co-incineration of Industrial Solid Waste (ISW) in Existed Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration Plant and Its Waste Pit Management [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2022, 30(6): 28-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Status Evaluation of Groundwater Quality of A Waste Landfill Site in Tongliao   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] . Analysis on Characteristics of Stench and Effect of Different Deodorization Processes in Domestic Refuse Transfer#br# Station   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] . Stress Analysis of Steam-water Pipes and Optimized Design of Support-hangers in Waste Incineration Power Plant   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] . Research on Treatment of Water-wall High Temperature Corrosion of Waste Heat Boiler in Municipal Solid Waste#br# Incinerator   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] . Prediction on Generation Quantity of Food Waste in Planning of Kitchen Waste Disposal Facilities   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech