环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 7-16.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.04.002

• 有机固废生物处理与高值化利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国家庭厨余垃圾与餐厨垃圾理化性质对比分析——源头分类的影响

杨 娜,王 巧,吕 凡,余波平,徐期勇,何品晶   

  1. 1. 深圳市环境科学研究院; 2. 同济大学 固体废物处理与资源化研究所; 3. 北京大学深圳研究生院; 4. 广东省环境保护污水高质化利用工程技术研发中心
  • 出版日期:2023-08-31 发布日期:2023-08-31

Comparative Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics between Household Food Waste and Restaurant Food Waste in China : Impact of Source Segregation

YANG Na, WANG Qiao, LYU Fan, YU Boping, XU Qiyong, HE Pinjing   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Academy of Environmental Science; 2. Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University; 3. Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School; 4. Guangdong Provincial Environmental Protection Wastewater Quality Utilization Engineering Technology R&D Center
  • Online:2023-08-31 Published:2023-08-31

摘要: 理化性质是决定厨余垃圾处理技术选型和污染潜力评估的关键参数。通过源头分类后厨余垃圾的采样测试和文献数据甄别、调研,总结了我国家庭厨余垃圾和餐厨垃圾的理化性质指标。研究结果表明,深圳市源头分类的家庭厨余垃圾杂质含量(12.60%±2.50%)和重金属浓度(除Cr外均低于检测限)处于强制分类制度实施前的报道数据以下,而有机质含量(90.6%±5.0%)相比报道数据则更高,其资源化利用率得到有效提升;与生活垃圾混合收运时的含水率(65.5%±4.0%)相比,经源头分类的家庭厨余垃圾含水率更高(76.8%±5.0%,P=0.004 7),通过限制水分向其他垃圾组分的迁移,提高了后者的热值和回收潜力。我国家庭厨余垃圾的密度为(0.38±0.16) t/m3,盐分、有机质和脂肪含量分别为1.34%±0.51%、81.8%±5.7%、12.3%±6.1%,显著低于餐厨垃圾的(0.92±0.17) t/m3(P=0.000 29)、3.89%±2.00%(P=0.043)、90.1%±4.8%(P=0.000 1)、21.6%±7.9%(P=0.022),其余指标无显著差异。在垃圾管理系统中,家庭厨余垃圾和餐厨垃圾的收集运输和预处理环节应根据其性质特点分别设计;处理环节可根据工艺特点和技术参数要求进行调质后实现一定程度的协同。经测算,家庭厨余垃圾和餐厨垃圾的盐分含量均低于生物处理的浓度抑制限值;堆肥产品中的重金属浓度低于相关污染评价标准限值。

关键词: 家庭厨余垃圾, 餐厨垃圾, 源头分类, 理化性质, 协同处理

Abstract: Physical and chemical properties were the key parameters to determine the technology selection and pollution potential assessment of kitchen waste treatment. The physical and chemical properties of household food waste (HFW)and restaurant food waste (RFW)in China were summarized by sampling test and literature data screening and investigation after source classification. The results indicated that compared with the data reported before the waste classification policy, the contents of impurities (12.60%±2.50%) and heavy metals (below detection limit except for Cr) of the source segregated HFW in Shenzhen were lower, while the organic matter content (90.6%±5.0%) was higher, its resource utilization rate had been effectively improved. The moisture content of HFW by source segregation was higher (76.8%±5.0%, P=0.004 7) than those sampled from mixed collected MSW (65.5%±4.0%), which could promote the calorific value and recovery potential of other waste components by restricting water diffusion to other waste components. The density, sodium chloride, organic matter and fat content of HFW in China were (0.38±0.16) t/m3, 1.34%±0.51%, 81.8%±5.7%, 12.3%±6.1%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of RFW of (0.92±0.17) t/m3 (P=0.000 29), 3.89%±2.00% (P=0.043), 90.1%±4.8% (P=0.000 1), 21.6%±7.9% (P=0.022). And there was no significant difference in other indicators. Accordingly, in waste management system, the collection, transportation, and pretreatment processes of HFW and RFW should be designed independently according to their characteristics. The processing process could achieve a certain degree of coordination after conditioning according to the process characteristics and technical parameters. It was estimated that the salt content of HFW and RFW were both below the limit of inhibition concentration for biological treatment. The heavy metal contents of compost products were also lower than the relevant pollution assessment standards limit.

Key words:  household food waste, restaurant food waste, source-segregation, physical and chemical properties, co-treatment

[1] 卢艳娟, 李海芳, 何金玲, 林航天, 王珍宝. 餐厨垃圾处理项目运营现状分析——以陕西省某餐厨垃圾处理项目为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 17-21.
[2] 蓝苑瑗, 吴 松, 王 磊. 物料调理缓解餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化效应及其机制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 27-34.
[3] 董成耀, 顾 霞, 赵 磊, 周永泉, 李 响. 餐厨垃圾厌氧生物转化预处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 24-32.
[4] 杨德坤, 龙吉生, 刘殊嘉. 静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理项目及运行优势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 95-100.
[5] 高 振, 马英群, 刘 雨, 汪群慧. 餐饮废油作为碳源用于微生物油脂生产:促进还是抑制?[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 125-125.
[6] 屈 阳, 李月中, 朱卫兵, 吴 元, 朱丽可, 王伟平. 回料对餐厨垃圾二步法堆肥处理效果的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 16-15.
[7] 徐峥勇, 刘 艳, 李 慧, 冯 伟, 王 恺. 某高速公路服务区餐厨垃圾就地资源化技术研究与示范[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 43-48.
[8] 杨 占, 吕 凡, 胡 甜, 徐翔宇, 章 骅, 邵立明, 叶建锋, 何品晶. 源头破袋对厨余垃圾厌氧消化残余物中碎、微塑料的赋存影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 125-125.
[9] 徐明月, 杨 民, 孙海曙, 孟 洁, 李永胜, 高 明, 汪群慧, 吴川福. 多阶段接菌对餐厨垃圾和沼渣共堆肥的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 110-110.
[10] 史东晓, 汤晓艳, 陆祥昕, 徐 刚, 陆燕中, 吕 清. 餐厨垃圾有机残渣资源化利用方式比较研究——以常州市餐厨废弃物综合处置项目(一期)为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 55-59,66.
[11] 梁曼丽, 袁维波, 敖 冬, 高婷婷, 李 倩, 陈 荣. 餐厨垃圾制备高性能反硝化碳源的厌氧发酵条件优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 60-66.
[12] 马晓宇, 高 明, 刘 硕, 李 媛, 孙晓红, 汪群慧. 碱预处理废液回用显著降低乳酸共发酵中水和碱的消耗[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 112-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发