环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 95-100.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.02.015

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理项目及运行优势分析

杨德坤,龙吉生,刘殊嘉   

  1. 上海康恒环境股份有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-25

Case Study and Operational Advantage Analysis of Food Waste Co-processing in Eco-Industrial Park

YANG Dekun, LONG Jisheng, LIU Shujia   

  1. Shanghai SUS Environment Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 针对餐厨垃圾处理项目存在投资运行成本高、占地面积大、盈利难等问题,提出静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理模式,即餐厨垃圾处理项目依托生活垃圾焚烧厂建设,采用“预处理+协同处理”工艺实现与生活垃圾焚烧厂的协同处理。以山东省某静脉产业园内餐厨垃圾协同处理项目为例,介绍了以“物料接收+分拣+制浆+除砂除杂+三相提油”为主体的餐厨垃圾预处理工艺,分析了运行数据,比较了协同处理与单独厌氧两种工艺的运行经济性及碳减排情况。结果表明:该项目预处理工艺运行稳定,运行期间设备产能可达到11 t/h,油脂、残渣和浆液平均产率分别为2.87%、36.56%和74.40%;水、电、蒸汽吨垃圾耗量基本满足设计要求,平均耗量分别为0.09 t、18.93 kWh、0.06 t;100 t/d餐厨垃圾协同处理较单独厌氧处理优势明显,运行费用可节省36.30%;与单独厌氧处理相比,协同处理节省电力约237.17 MWh/a,折合碳减排量可达168.84 tCO2e/a。静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理模式可作为后续餐厨垃圾处理项目推荐采用的优选方案。

关键词: 餐厨垃圾, 静脉产业园, 协同处理, 单独厌氧, 运行优势

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of high investment and operation cost, large area occupied, and difficulty in making profits in the food waste treatment project, a co-processing mode of food waste in the eco-industrial park was proposed in this study. The food waste treatment project relied on the construction of municipal solid waste incineration plant and adopts the “pretreatment + co-processing” process to realize the collaborative treatment with the municipal solid waste incineration plant. A food waste co-processing project in an eco-industrial park in Shandong was taken as an example, the food waste pre-treatment process with “material receiving + sorting + pulping + sand removal and impurity removal + three-phase oil extraction” as the main body was introduced. The operating data was analyzed, the operating economics and carbon emission reductions of the two processes of co-processing and independent anaerobic were compared. The results showed that the pre-treatment process of the project was stable. During the operation, the equipment production capacity could reach about 11 t/h, the average yields of grease, residue and slurry were 2.87%, 36.56%, and 74.40% respectively. The waste consumption per ton of water, electricity, and steam basically met the design requirements, and the average consumption were 0.09 t, 18.93 kWh, and 0.06 t respectively. The 100 t/d food waste co-processing had obvious advantages over independent anaerobic treatment, the operating cost could be saved by 36.30%. Compared with the independent anaerobic treatment, co-processing saved about 237.17 MWh/a of electricity, and the equivalent carbon emission reduction could reach about 168.84 tCO2e/a. The co-processing mode of food waste in the eco-industrial park could be used as the recommended optimal solution for subsequent food waste treatment projects.

Key words: food waste, eco-industrial park, co-processing, independent anaerobic, operational advantages

[1] 高 振, 马英群, 刘 雨, 汪群慧. 餐饮废油作为碳源用于微生物油脂生产:促进还是抑制?[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 125-125.
[2] 屈 阳, 李月中, 朱卫兵, 吴 元, 朱丽可, 王伟平. 回料对餐厨垃圾二步法堆肥处理效果的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 16-15.
[3] 徐峥勇, 刘 艳, 李 慧, 冯 伟, 王 恺. 某高速公路服务区餐厨垃圾就地资源化技术研究与示范[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 43-48.
[4] 徐明月, 杨 民, 孙海曙, 孟 洁, 李永胜, 高 明, 汪群慧, 吴川福. 多阶段接菌对餐厨垃圾和沼渣共堆肥的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 110-110.
[5] 史东晓, 汤晓艳, 陆祥昕, 徐 刚, 陆燕中, 吕 清. 餐厨垃圾有机残渣资源化利用方式比较研究——以常州市餐厨废弃物综合处置项目(一期)为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 55-59,66.
[6] 梁曼丽, 袁维波, 敖 冬, 高婷婷, 李 倩, 陈 荣. 餐厨垃圾制备高性能反硝化碳源的厌氧发酵条件优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 60-66.
[7] 马晓宇, 高 明, 刘 硕, 李 媛, 孙晓红, 汪群慧. 碱预处理废液回用显著降低乳酸共发酵中水和碱的消耗[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 112-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发