环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 51-59.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.05.008

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂优化设计思考

王 雷   

  1. 上海环境工程建设项目管理有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-10-27 发布日期:2023-10-27

Consideration on the Optimization Design of Waste to Energy Plants

WANG Lei   

  1. Shanghai Environmental Engineering Construction Project Management Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-10-27 Published:2023-10-27

摘要: 针对城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂主厂房建筑面积、混凝土配筋量、桩基优化、渗滤液原液回喷、主蒸汽参数选择、在线吹灰组合模式、厂用电率等7个关键设计要素,从降本增效的角度提出了中小型生活垃圾焚烧发电厂优化设计思路。通过多个典型案例的技术经济指标比对与分析,形成了500 t/d×1和500 t/d×2规模的生活垃圾焚烧发电厂7个设计推荐应用模式或典型控制值。其中:主厂房面积宜控制在12 000~19 000 m2,主厂房混凝土配筋量宜控制在160~195 kg/m3,通过合理的桩型选择和试桩优化可以节约25%以上桩基投资,渗滤液原液回喷单条焚烧线可降低渗滤液处理系统30 t/d设计规模,主蒸汽宜选用450 ℃、6.4 MPa的中温次高压参数,余热锅炉宜采取“水喷淋吹灰+蒸汽吹灰+激波吹灰”的在线吹灰组合模式,厂用电率宜控制在14%~18%。

关键词: 城市生活垃圾, 焚烧厂, 优化设计, 降本, 增效

Abstract: According to seven key design elements of the main factory building floor area, concrete reinforcement amount, pile foundation optimization, leachate spraying, main steam parameter selection, on-line soot blowing combined mode and station service power consumption rate of municipal solid waste incineration power plant, the optimization design ideas for the construction of new waste to energy plant were proposed from the angle of cost reduction and efficiency increase. Through the comparison and analysis of technical and economic indexes of several typical projects, seven recommended application modes or typical control values were formed on the optimization design of waste to energy plants with the scale of 500 t/d×1 and 500 t/d×2. Among which, main factory building floor area should be controlled at 12 000~19 000 m2, concrete reinforcement amount of main factory building should be controlled at 160~195 kg/m3, more than 25% of the pile foundation investment could be saved by selecting reasonable pile types and optimizing pile testing. Leachate spraying was applied to an incineration line, which could reduce leachate treatment system scale by 30 t/d,medium temperature and sub-high pressure parameters of 450 ℃ and 6.4 MPa should be applied to main steam. On-line soot blowing combined mode of “water spray soot blowing+steam soot blowing+shockwave soot blowing” should be applied to waste heat boiler, and the station service power consumption rate should be controlled at 14%~18%.

Key words: municipal solid waste, incineration plant, optimization design, cost reduction, efficiency increase

[1] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[2] 缪 巍, 夏 宇, 张永禄, 王松涛, 陈运启, 陈则良. 生活垃圾焚烧厂第三方监管模式及未来发展趋势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 88-93.
[3] 秦 浩, 马长永. 生活垃圾渗滤液膜浓缩液全量化处理工艺应用分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 108-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[4] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[5] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[6] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[7] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[8] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
[9] 杨磊锋杨非邢家乐李加文. 垃圾气力输送管路特性参数试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 90 -94 .
[10] 田忠平房飞祥孙大朋唐合琪高洪振纪圣振. 基于筛分处理的生活垃圾分选工艺应用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(2): 94 -96 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发