环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 57-62.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.04.010

• 建筑垃圾利用、处理与处置 • 上一篇    下一篇

建筑垃圾制再生砖的经济性分析

朱美琳,王志强,刘文林,李 季,白 力,龙吉生   

  1. 1.上海康恒环境股份有限公司;2.上海生活垃圾焚烧处理技术及装备工程研究中心
  • 出版日期:2023-08-31 发布日期:2023-08-31

Economic Analysis of Recycled Bricks Made from Construction and Demolition Debris

ZHU Meilin, WANG Zhiqiang, LIU Wenlin, LI Ji, BAI Li, LONG Jisheng   

  1. 1. Shanghai SUS Environment Co. Ltd.; 2. Shanghai Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Technology and Equipment Engineering Research Center
  • Online:2023-08-31 Published:2023-08-31

摘要: 以南京市为例,通过对比煤矸石、粉煤灰制砖和建筑垃圾制再生砖,研究再生砖的经济可行性。仅考虑运营期3种制砖方式的营收情况,以3.0×105 t煤矸石、粉煤灰及建筑垃圾为例,其运营成本分别为4 800万元、3 817万元和2 300万元,以收益比运营成本计算的直接经济效益分别为1.13、1.18和1.49,均大于1,即收益大于成本,再生砖优势明显。相较于煤矸石及粉煤灰,政府补贴占建筑垃圾制备再生砖收益的26.32%,能有效保障建筑垃圾资源化企业的生存。制约再生砖企业的主要原因是建筑垃圾回收率低导致再生砖来源少,再生砖在社会认可度等方面缺乏与同类产品的竞争优势导致其缺少市场竞争力,基于此建议政府部门通过补贴鼓励新建工程使用再生材料、颁发特许经营和拨专项科研经费等方式提高再生砖的社会认可度、产品质量和竞争力。

关键词: 建筑垃圾, 资源化, 再生砖, 经济效益

Abstract: Taking Nanjing as an example, the economic feasibility of recycled brick was studied by comparing the brick made from coal gangue, fly ash and construction and demolition debris. Only the revenue of the three brick-making methods during the operation period was considered, and the 3.0×105 t coal gangue, fly ash and construction and demolition debris were taken as an example. The operating costs were 48.00, 38.17 and 23.00 million, respectively, and the direct economic benefits calculated by the ratio of income to operating costs were 1.13, 1.18 and 1.49, which were greater than 1.00. It was showed that the benefits were greater than the costs, and the advantages of recycled bricks were obvious. Compared with gangue and fly ash, government subsidies accounted for 26.32% of the revenue from the recycled bricks made from construction and demolition debris, which could effectively guarantee the survival of construction and demolition debris recycling enterprises.The main reason for restricting recycled brick enterprises was that the low recovery rate of construction waste leaded to less recycled brick sources. And recycled bricks lacked competitive advantages with similar products in terms of social recognition, resulted in a lack of market competitiveness. Based on this, it was suggested that the government departments could improve the social recognition, product quality and competitiveness of recycled bricks by encouraging the use of recycled materials in new projects, issuing franchise operations and allocating special scientific research funds.

Key words: construction waste, recycling, recycled brick, economic benefits

[1] 郝粼波. 基于宏观环境分析法的我国建筑垃圾处理行业发展研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 70-75.
[2] 金德民. “无废城市”背景下建筑垃圾资源化产业发展机遇及对策探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 76-82.
[3] 朱 悦, 何品晶, 章 骅. 上海市园林废弃物产生与利用现状、难点及对策分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 15-23.
[4] 李贵敏. 海口市建筑垃圾管理现状与处置建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 50-54.
[5] 赵 磊, 吴 元, 单 君, 王亚东, 邵 军, 李 科. 运行参数对厨余垃圾生物水解反应影响的中试研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 57-62.
[6] 徐峥勇, 刘 艳, 李 慧, 冯 伟, 王 恺. 某高速公路服务区餐厨垃圾就地资源化技术研究与示范[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 43-48.
[7] 张俊文, 苏兴国, 李湛江, 黄亚玲, 李 瑾. 某高龄期大型垃圾填埋场矿化垃圾理化特性与资源化利用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 81-86.
[8] 葛亚军, 杨 旭, 曹占强, 戴小东. 基于某南方填埋场筛分资源化车间氨气浓度分布的喷淋除臭工艺优化方向[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 87-90.
[9] 赵爱华, 邰 俊, 车 越, 李光明, 钱光人, 毕珠洁. 上海生活源可回收物资源化特点分析及协同管理机制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 70-76.
[10] 徐 娇, 杨黎彬, 周雪飞. 厕所黑水、黄水处理和资源化技术研究现状与展望[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 1-13.
[11] 张 鹏, 潘 琦, 彭 莉, 田 伟, 冉林杰, 刘 雪. 工业废盐处理处置现状及趋势[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 67-71,82.
[12] 葛恩燕, 胡 超. 生活垃圾填埋场开采筛分处置技术研究——以卧旗山垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 88-93.
[13] 程 文, 耿 震, 蒋岚岚. 太湖流域某装修垃圾资源化利用工程设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 94-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发