[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 67-77,85.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2026.04.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Process Optimization and LCA of a Commercial Combustible Waste Gasification Poly-generation System

Guo Jiaxin, Liao Yanfen, Tang Yuting   

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Utilization of Energy, School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology
  • Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-08-25

Abstract: To improve the resource utilization efficiency of combustible solid waste and explore efficient low-carbon production paths for hydrogen energy, an integrated energy-exergy-environment (3E) assessment model was constructed for a commercial combustible waste gasification poly-generation (CWGP) system to evaluate its technical performance and environmental impacts. Through sensitivity analysis, the global optimal operating parameters were determined as follows: a gasification temperature of 950 ℃, a steam-to-waste ratio of 0.5, and an equivalence ratio of 0.30. Under these conditions, the total yield of CO and H2 was 488.7 kmol/h, and the total thermal efficiency of the system reached 64.13%. The overall exergy efficiency was 58.69%, with the gasification reaction unit (GSF) being the largest source of exergy destruction (56.09%) due to the strong irreversibility of high-temperature chemical reactions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) results showed that treating 1 ton of solid waste yielded 89.7 kg of hydrogen with a carbon capture rate as high as 91.1%, and a total life cycle global warming (GW) potential of 413.14 kg. Normalization analysis further identified ecotoxicity as the primary environmental load of the system, stemming from the external electricity consumption of 205.1 kWh/t, which contributed to the majority of environmental indicators besides GW. In conclusion, enhancing process thermal efficiency to reduce auxiliary power consumption and introducing renewable energy supply are the core paths for synergistically reducing the carbon footprint and environmental toxicity of the poly-generation system, thereby achieving a green transition of the process.

Key words: commercial combustible waste, poly-generation system, hydrogen production, process optimization, life cycle assessment

[1] Cao Ziqing, Yuan Shanshan, Song Zhenyu, Liu Fan, Kang Xuehe, Chao Junwei, Zhang Chengfang. Carbon Emission Accounting and Low-carbon Optimization Methods for Contaminated Site Remediation Based on Life Cycle Assessment [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(4): 78-85.
[2] Zhai Kaixiong, Liu Yulong. Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Research on the Three-level Synergistic Integrated Utilization of High-alumina Coal Gangue [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(4): 94-102.
[3] ZHA Shiquzong, ZHENG Liangfeng, TONG Xingbing, JI Lingye, ZHAO Jiayuan, WANG Chenxi, NAN Qiong, WU Weixiang. Carbon Emissions and Environmental Impact Analysis of Typical Putrescible Waste Treatment Plants in Hangzhou [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(2): 75-83,92.
[4] ZHOU Peng, ZHU Kezhen, YANG Xiaohong, CUI Xiaomei, DAN Zeng. Experimental Study on Composting of Rural Household Dry-toilet Manure Mixed with Highland Barley Straw in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2026, 34(1): 28-34,42.
[5] WANG Feng, LI Mengting, LUO Lin, WANG Yingda. Carbon Footprint Accounting and Influencing Factors Analysis of Decoration Waste Resource Utilization [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(6): 87-95.
[6] TAO Shuangyi, CHEN Yingjian, DU Qian, YANG Jiakuan. Research on the Environmental Impact of a New Pyrolysis Resource Utilization Process for Iron-Containing Sludge Based on Life Cycle [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(4): 18-27,37.
[7] GAN Fangmao, WU Lixin, YU Wenbo , HU Guang, HUI Erqing, GUO Shuai. Comparative Study on Greenhouse Gas Emission Potential of Different Disposal Modes of Rural Domestic Waste: A Case Study of Buhe Town, Hubei Province [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(1): 112-118.
[8] ZHAO Yuxuan, WEI Guoxia, LIU Hanqiao, ZHAO Hailong, LI Tong, GONG Yongyue, QIAO Haoyu. Life Cycle Assessment of Two Emergency Co-Disposal Technologies of Medical Waste [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2022, 30(6): 58-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Engineering Characteristics of Bottom Ash in Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator   [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[2] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(2): 39 -42 .
[3] . Study on Self-flocculation of Landfill Leachate Induced by the Addition of NaOH[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 34 -37 .
[4] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2018, 26(5): 80 -82 .
[5] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(1): 28 -32 .
[6] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(1): 47 -49 .
[7] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(2): 21 -27 .
[8] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(2): 66 -69 .
[9] . [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(4): 13 -18 .
[10] Huang Weizhao, Lin Yiping, Chen Jiaqin. Effects of Different Inoculums on Anaerobic Digestion of Kitchen Waste[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2019, 27(6): 53 -56 .
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech