环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 66-72.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.05.010

• 危险废物利用、处理与处置 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于ArcGIS和EVS的堆放废物危险特性鉴别应用与研究

卓 宁,陈小丫,吴 伟   

  1. 江苏环保产业技术研究院股份公司
  • 出版日期:2023-10-27 发布日期:2023-10-27

Application and Study of Hazardous Characteristics Identification of Stacked Waste Based on ArcGIS and EVS

ZHUO Ning, CHEN Xiaoya, WU Wei   

  1. Jiangsu Academy of Environmental Industry and Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-10-27 Published:2023-10-27

摘要: 为科学合理制订露天堆放废物危险特性鉴别采样方案,直观展示超鉴别标准限值废物空间分布范围,针对某大型废物堆放场地展开研究。首先,应用ArcGIS进行绘制堆放边界、创建网格、计算中心坐标、顺序编号等操作,制订废物采样方案;然后,应用EVS创建堆场地形和浸出毒性无机氟化物三维可视化模型,对比Kriging、IDW、NN和RBF 4种插值方法中无机氟化物超标空间范围和方量差异;最后,采用K折交叉验证评估插值精度。研究表明:应用ArcGIS制订采样方案可大幅简化现场工作量;应用EVS 4种插值方法构建的三维可视化模型存在差异,进一步证实了Kriging插值精度最高,较切实地反映出超标空间范围,并可据此估算超标方量。

关键词: 废物, 危险特性鉴别, ArcGIS, EVS, 三维可视化

Abstract: In order to develop a scientifically robust sampling scheme for identifying the hazardous characteristics of solid waste in the open air and visually represent the spatial distribution range of waste exceeding the super identification limit, a study was conducted at a large solid waste site. First, a waste sampling scheme was developed using ArcGIS to delineate the site boundaries, create grids, calculate central coordinates, and number the sequence. Then, the Environmental Visualization System(EVS) was utilized to generate 3D visual models of the terrain and the inorganic fluorides extraction toxicity respectively. The spatial ranges and quantities of inorganic fluorides exceeding the threshold were compared using four interpolation methods, including Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Nearest Neighbor (NN), and Radial Basis Function (RBF). Finally, the accuracy of these methods was evaluated using the K-fold cross-validation technique. The findings indicated that the application of ArcGIS to develop the sampling scheme could considerably simplify the on-site workload. And there were differences in 3D visualization models constructed by the four EVS interpolation methods. Moreover, the Kriging method demonstrated the highest accuracy and offered a more realistic depiction of the space range exceeding the standard limits. And based on this, the amount of excess square was estimated.

Key words: waste, hazardous characteristics identification, ArcGIS, EVS, 3D visualization

[1] 张 帅, 周弋铃, 詹良通, 黄旭阳, 辛江原, 陈云敏. “无废城市”建设指标体系优化:存量固体废物治理[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 1-11.
[2] 郝艳召, 张 毅, 马 宁, 李鹏龙, 刘意立. 垃圾收运车辆驾驶循环构建及燃油消耗量估算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 128-128.
[3] 郝艳召,张 毅,马 宁,李鹏龙,刘意立. 垃圾收运车辆驾驶循环构建及燃油消耗量估算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 128-128.
[4] 吉彦鹏, 王俊懿, 禚 斌. 危险废物熔融炉辅助喷枪水力学模型试验研究及应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 70-73,79.
[5] 杨 杰, 陈 羲, 孙琼玉, 郑姗姗, 沈远东, 詹明秀. 固体废物和污染土壤制备陶粒协同处置研究综述[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 63-68.
[6] 甘树福, 黄 芊, 梁 辉. 企业危险废物规范化环境管理评估与对策建议——以某省为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 104-109.
[7] 周小莉, 谢 静, 尚伟伟, 杨方圆, 王淑艳, 杨俊杰. 新冠疫情期间河南省医疗废物应急处置研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 74-79.
[8] 王子鸣, 闫大海, 王 雷. 基于文献计量的危险废物污染防治技术研究趋势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 73-85.
[9] 钟江平. 上海市小型医疗机构医疗废物收运“最后一公里”实践研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 33-37.
[10] 聂 榕, 彭 伟, 吕 凡, 章 骅, 何品晶. 生物可降解塑料厌氧消化降解研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 46-56.
[11] 李天琪, 吕 凡, 仇俊杰, 章 骅, 何品晶. 5种典型膜处理流程中渗滤液溶解性有机物物质流分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 126-126.
[12] 朱焕铮, 张 涛, 陆洁平, 陈 海, 何仕均. 医疗废物辐照消毒处理工程设计与经济分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 40-45,57.
[13] 赵宇轩, 魏国侠, 刘汉桥, 赵海龙, 李 通, 龚永月, 乔浩宇. 两种医疗废物应急协同处置技术的生命周期评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 58-63.
[14] 何田妹, 龙冬清, 张 华. 基于5M1E管理的医疗废物处置中心新冠肺炎疫情防控策略研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 83-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发