环境卫生工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 112-116.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2025.04.015

• 环境卫生管理与评价体系 • 上一篇    下一篇

青岛市城市生活垃圾处理费征收工作研究及对策建议

王昕昕,郑伟萍,张文勇,庄 颖,董 方   

  1. 青岛市环境卫生发展中心
  • 出版日期:2025-08-28 发布日期:2025-08-28

Research and Countermeasure Suggestions on Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Fee Charging in Qingdao

WANG Xinxin, ZHENG Weiping, ZHANG Wenyong, ZHUANG Ying, DONG Fang   

  1. Qingdao Urban Environmental Sanitation Development Center
  • Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-08-28

摘要: 通过调研青岛市生活垃圾处理费征收现状,分析收费工作中存在的收缴率低、收费方式滞后、收费阻力大、收费成本高等问题。对国内外常用收费方式及收费模式进行比较,发现“水消费系数法”收费方式具有明显优势,可避免拒交、少交问题,确保收费过程公正性与规范性。基于此,建议青岛市以“水消费系数法”为主,采取“分区动态混合收费模式”,委托自来水公司代收垃圾处理费。同时,提出通过加大宣传、完善收费体系、鼓励社会监督、强化执法等措施提高收缴率。此外,从完善垃圾收费政策、实现智慧管理、探索农村垃圾收费3个方面对生活垃圾收费管理未来发展进行展望,以期为相关工作提供参考。

关键词:  生活垃圾, 处理费征收, 对策建议, 水消费系数法

Abstract: Through research on the current situation of the collection of domestic waste treatment fees in Qingdao city, the problems existing in the charging work were analyzed, such as low collection rates, outdated charging methods, significant collection resistance, and high operational costs. By comparing the commonly used charging methods and models at home and abroad, it was revealed that the “water consumption coefficient method” demonstrated distinct advantages in preventing payment defaults and underpayment, while it could ensure the fairness and standardization during the charging process. Based on these findings, it is suggested that Qingdao adopts the “water consumption coefficient method” as its primary approach, and adopts a “zoned dynamic hybrid charging model” that entrusting the water supply company to collect the waste treatment fee on its behalf. Meanwhile,to enhance collection efficiency, complementary measures has been recommended such as increasing publicity, improving the charging system, encouraging social supervision and strengthening law enforcement. Furthermore, with the aim of providing references for related work, the future development of domestic waste charging management has been prospected from three aspects: refining waste charging policies, implementing smart management systems, and exploring rural waste charging mechanisms.

Key words:  municipal solid waste, treatment fee charging, countermeasures and suggestions, water consumption coefficient method

[1] 黄淑娟, 李 航. 城市生活垃圾处理费计取方法及实施条件研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 105-111.
[2] 秦 浩, 马长永. 生活垃圾渗滤液膜浓缩液全量化处理工艺应用分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 108-112.
[3] 王 川, 邰 俊, 宋立杰, 毕珠洁, 欧阳创, 奚 慧. 上海市居民生活垃圾处理收费调查研究及对策建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 84-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发