环境卫生工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 31-39.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2022.05.004

• 有机固废生物处理与高值化利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型厨余垃圾组分水热炭化处理的转化特性研究

王林林,辛少菲,赵临轩,金宜英,马伟芳,徐康宁   

  1. 1. 北京林业大学 环境科学与工程学院;2. 国家电网东营供电公司;3. 中国人民大学 环境学院;4. 清华大学 环境学院
  • 出版日期:2022-10-26 发布日期:2022-10-26

Research on Transformation Characteristics of Several Typical Components of Kitchen Waste by Hydrothermal Carbonization Treatment

WANG Linlin, XIN Shaofei, ZHAO Linxuan, JIN Yiying, MA Weifang, XU Kangning   

  1. 1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University; 2. State Grid Dongying Electric Power Company; 3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Renmin University of China; 4. School of Environment, Tsinghua University
  • Online:2022-10-26 Published:2022-10-26

摘要: 随着我国垃圾分类工作的推进,城市厨余垃圾分出量急剧增加,亟需研发适宜性的处理技术。水热炭化是一种有机固废高值化处理技术,但是在厨余垃圾处理中的适用性仍然有待研究。对淀粉类(馒头)、纤维素类(长白菜)和蛋白质类(瘦猪肉)3种典型厨余垃圾组分以及真实混合厨余垃圾的水热炭化特性进行研究,并分析了3种原料在不同炭化温度、恒温时间和含水率条件下的水热炭产率及产物性质。结果表明,炭化温度和恒温时间是水热炭产率和炭化程度的关键影响因素,而含水率的影响较小。3种厨余原料的水热炭化产物性质有显著差异。淀粉类原料的水热炭产率(41.7%~52.4%)高于纤维素类原料(27.3%~47.5%),两种水热炭都是微球形貌且炭化程度较高;而蛋白质类原料不易产生水热炭(产率仅6.2%~24.0%),无固定形态,且炭化程度较低。真实混合厨余垃圾水热炭产率可达49%,炭化程度较高。淀粉类和纤维素类原料的炭化液为酸性(pH为3.1~4.7),而蛋白质类原料的炭化液为中性或碱性(pH为6.2~9.2),蛋白质类原料是炭化液总有机碳和腐植酸的主要贡献者;真实厨余垃圾水热炭化液为酸性,含有一定的氮磷营养元素和腐植酸等有机物质,为进一步资源化利用提供了可能。

关键词: 厨余垃圾, 水热炭化, 水热炭, 炭化液

Abstract: With the implementation of MSW classification in China, the amount of kitchen waste had increased greatly. Therefore, it was urgent to develop feasible treatment technology. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a value-added treatment of organic waste. However, the feasibility of HTC technology to kitchen waste treatment is still unclear. The Characteristics of HTC of three typical kitchen waste components including starch (steamed bread), cellulose (long cabbage), protein (lean pork) and the real mixed kitchen waste were investigate. The hydrochar yield and the product properties were studied under different carbonization temperatures, constant temperature time and moisture contents. The besults showed that the HTC temperature and the constant temperature time were the key factors determining the hydrochar yield and the carbonization degree, while the effect of the moisture content had little influence.There were significant differences in the properties of hydrothermal carbonization products of the three kinds of kitchen waste materials. The hydrochar yield from the starch raw material (41.7%~52.4%) was higher than that from the cellulose raw material (27.3%~47.5%). The two kinds of hydrochar both had a microsphere morphology and presented a high carbonization degree. However, the protein raw materials were not easy to produce hydrothermal carbon (yield only 6.2%~24.0%), with no fixed form and low carbonization degree. The hydrochar yield of real mixed kitchen waste was 49%, with a high carbonization degree. Thecarbonization fluid from starch and cellulose raw materials was acidic (pH was 3.1~4.7), while that from the protein raw material wasneutral or alkaline (pH was 6.2~9.2). The protein raw material was the main contributor to the total organic carbon and the humic acid of the carbonization fluid. The hydrothermal carbonization fluid obtained from real kitchen waste was acidic and contained certain organic substances such as nitrogen, phosphorus nutrients and humic acid, which provided the possibility for further resource utilization.

Key words: kitchen waste, hydrothermal carbonization, hydrochar, Carbonized liquid

[1] 王慧慧, 王 领, 朱旻航, 连宋剑. 我国厨余垃圾处理设施现状及处理成本分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 12-18.
[2] 王玉洁, 仇俊杰, 吕 凡, 章 骅, 何品晶. 乳酸介导碳链延长产己酸规模化应用瓶颈[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 27-36,48.
[3] 刘 彬, 张 森, 王立彤. 厨余垃圾干式厌氧发酵处理技术的应用对比探究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 37-48.
[4] 张晓星, 王 伟, 张献华. 提油对家庭厨余垃圾厌氧资源化处理工程运营安全及经济性分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 49-55.
[5] 夏 青, 徐孝健, 张虞婷, 周呈亚, 刘海春. 扬州家庭厨余垃圾重金属赋存特征与风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 50-54.
[6] 刘 彬, 张 森, 王立彤. 重庆洛碛厨余垃圾干式厌氧发酵技术工程应用探究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 55-63.
[7] 王一然, 孟星尧, 李京霖, 王 攀, 任连海. 厨余垃圾好氧堆肥过程中恶臭气体研究现状[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 40-49,56.
[8] 尚怡君, 李许南, 刘 岩, 陈永杰, 袁 伟, 陆建红. 厨余垃圾好氧堆肥中抗生素抗性基因消长研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 80-89.
[9] 王 峰, 孙金浩, 刘纹君, 陈卫华, 田弘毅, 炊春萌, 谢 冰. 不同原料配比对沼渣和厨余垃圾共堆肥的理化性质和腐熟度的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 41-47.
[10] 马 想, 陈 平, 梁 晶. 两种城市源有机固体废物生物质炭理化特性研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 29-35.
[11] 周永泉, 李小伟, 邰 俊. 低剂量纸巾添加对餐厨垃圾和厨余垃圾共消化的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 36-43.
[12] 肖 绎, 贾维健. 北京市生活垃圾甲烷控制状况与综合利用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 9-15.
[13] 林晓凤. 厨余垃圾干式厌氧发酵过程中的挥发性脂肪酸测定方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 42-46,53.
[14] 欧阳创, 张余镕, 邰 俊, 徐先宝, 薛 罡, 李 响. 沼渣水热炭与沼渣热解炭强化餐厨垃圾厌氧消化对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 47-53.
[15] 张 玉. 西安市农村生活垃圾分类现状与对策研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 105-109,116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发