环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 99-103,111.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.05.015

• 城乡生活垃圾填埋与二次污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

浙江省某非正规垃圾填埋场调查及风险评价

商卫纯,王丽晓,郑 吉,刁鲁懿   

  1. 宁波市生态环境科学研究院
  • 出版日期:2024-11-01 发布日期:2024-11-01

Investigation and Risk Assessment of an Informal Landfill in Zhejiang Province

SHANG Weichun, WANG Lixiao, ZHENG Ji,DIAO Luyi   

  1. Ningbo Research Institute of Ecological and Environmental Sciences
  • Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-11-01

摘要: 以浙江省某非正规垃圾填埋场为例,对填埋气含量、渗滤液浓度以及垃圾有机质含量、生物可降解度等进行调查,分析填埋场的污染状况、稳定化水平以及堆体环境风险。结果表明,填埋气中CH4体积分数为2.41%~44.94%,均值为25.64%,87%的钻探点位CH4体积分数超过GB 16889—2024生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准中填埋场上方CH4气体含量限值(5%);对照GB 16889—2024中水污染物排放限值,垃圾渗滤液中色度、SS、COD、BOD5、Hg、Cr等12项指标超标,且超标率均在30%以上;垃圾堆体有机质含量范围为30.50%~70.70%、生物可降解度范围为7.10%~19.40%,二者含量均较高,垃圾腐化程度较低。总之,该填埋场虽然封场时间久,但是CH4产生量、垃圾有机质含量、生物可降解度以及渗滤液浓度均较高,仍处于不稳定状态;并且存量垃圾堆体污染风险指数为90.93分,属于高污染风险,表明该非正规填埋场由于填埋规模大、无污染防治措施等存在较大的环境风险与安全隐患。

关键词: 非正规垃圾填埋场, 环境污染, 稳定化水平, 环境风险评估

Abstract: Taking an informal landfill in Zhejiang province as an example, the landfill gas content, leachate concentration, organic matter content and biodegradability of waste was investigated, to analysis the pollution status, stabilization level and environmental risk of the landfill. The results showed that the CH4 volume fraction in landfill gas ranged from 2.41% to 44.94%, with an average of 25.64%. While 87% of drilling sites CH4 volume fraction exceeded the gas limit value (5%) above the landfill in GB 16889—2024 Standard for Pollution Control on the Landfill Site of Municipal Solid Waste. 12 indexes such as color scale, SS, COD, BOD5, Hg and Cr in landfill leachate exceeded the standard value in GB 16889—2024, and the exceeding standard rate were all more than 30%. The contents of organic matter and biodegradability in the waste pile were both high, ranging from 30.50% to 70.70% and 7.10% to 19.40%, respectively, so the degree of waste decay was low. In short, although the landfill had been closed for a long time, it had high methane production, organic matter content, biodegradability and leachate concentration, which was still in an unstable state. In addition, the pollution risk index of the stock garbage was 90.93 points, which belongs to the high level pollution risk, indicating that the informal landfill has great environmental risks and security risks due to its large scale and pollution-free prevention and control measures.

Key words: informal landfill, environmental pollution, stabilization level, environmental risk assessment

[1] 田 伟, 陈 琮, 彭 莉, 陈玉成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物的重金属污染特征及环境风险评估[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[2] 刘超然, 江文琛, 张海静, 王 磊, 黄 晟. 华东地区非正规垃圾填埋场开挖筛分治理工程案例分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 14-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 甘 洁, 刘 豪, 李建辉. 国内外生活垃圾焚烧厂的水排放与监管标准比较分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 11 -16 .
[2] 靖丹枫, 耿 震. 无锡市某垃圾分类集运及处理中心工程设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 24 -27,35 .
[3] 徐家林, 董卫, 蔡亚南. 德州市园林绿化垃圾碳循环创新示范技术研究与应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 125 -127 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发