环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 87-93,98.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.012

• 环境卫生管理与评价体系 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市社区生活垃圾分类治理高绩效路径研究——基于北京市100个社区的组态分析

何 怡,钟爱军,李香萍   

  1. 1. 北京市统计局;2.北京林业大学 ;3.北京清研灵智科技有限公司
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-01

Research on High Performance Paths for the Classification and Management of Domestic Waste in Urban Communities:Based on a Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 100 Communities in Beijing

HE Yi, ZHONG Aijun, LI Xiangping   

  1. 1. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics; 2. School of Marxism, Beijing Forestry University; 3. Beijing Qingyanlingzhi Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

摘要: 厘清城市社区生活垃圾分类治理获得高绩效的途径,对于认清我国城市社区生活垃圾分类治理机制以及基层社区社会治理共同体运转机制具有重要意义。运用组态方法对北京市100个城市社区生活垃圾分类治理绩效的生成路径进行比较分析。结果表明:党委政府、社区和居民3个层面主体发挥作用并形成协同互补,是城市社区获得生活垃圾分类治理高绩效的主因;居民的参与意愿对于获得高绩效具有“一票否决”的作用。因此建议,完善城市社区生活垃圾分类治理机制及基层社区社会治理共同体运转机制,既要重视改进党委政府和社区的工作,也要重视培养居民的共同体意识和参与意愿,使治理主体的作用形成良好协同互补。

关键词: 城市社区, 生活垃圾分类, 治理机制, 协同互补, 组态分析

Abstract: It was of great significance to clarify the high performance of urban community solid waste classification management for recognizing the mechanism of urban community domestic waste classification management and the operation mechanism of grassroots community social governance community. The generation path of domestic waste classification and governance performance of 100 urban communities in Beijing was compared and analyzed by using the configuration method. It was confirmed that the role and synergy and complementarity of the three levels of party committee and government, community and residents were the main reasons for urban communities to obtain the high performance of domestic waste classification and governance. The willingness of residents to participate had a “veto” effect on achieving high performance. Therefore, it was suggested that to improve the urban community domestic waste classification and governance mechanism and the grassroots community social governance community operation mechanism, we should not only pay attention to improving the work of the party committee government and the community, but also pay attention to cultivating residents’ sense of community and willingness to participate, so that the role of the governance subject could form a good synergy and complementarity.

Key words: urban community, domestic waste classification, governance mechanism, synergy and complementarity, qualitative comparative analysis

[1] 郭任宏, 徐长勇, 宋 薇. 城市生活垃圾分类工作评估关键技术研究与应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 107-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发