环境卫生工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 11-15.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2022.06.003

• 城乡生活垃圾填埋与二次污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

存量生活垃圾填埋场治理方式及商业模式的探讨

占松林,高 磊,周克斌   

  1. 1.中化商务有限公司;2.防灾科技学院
  • 出版日期:2023-01-04 发布日期:2023-01-04

Discussion on Renovation and Businesses Model of Existing Domestic Waste Landfill

ZHAN Songlin, GAO Lei, ZHOU Kebin   

  1. 1. Sinochem Commerce Co. Ltd.; 2. Institute of Disaster Prevention
  • Online:2023-01-04 Published:2023-01-04

摘要: 生活垃圾填埋场是我国处理生活垃圾的传统方式,不仅占用较多的土地和空间资源,而且对周边的空气、土壤、水体以及居民生活环境构成长期的潜在风险,多次被环保督察通报。随着生活垃圾焚烧处理全覆盖的推进,对存量生活垃圾填埋场进行整治与利用逐步成为很多地方的一项新任务。首先对垃圾填埋场整治与利用的需求和实践探索进行梳理,然后分析生态修复和开采再利用两种主要技术路线的流程、技术要求和适用范围,最后针对项目的落地实施提出工程总承包(EPC)、改建-运营-移交(ROT)、生态导向开发(EOD)3种商业模式,并给出了模式适用的建议。对于采用生态修复技术的项目,一般边界条件清晰,经营属性较差,宜由财政预算落实资金,可采用EPC模式;对于垃圾开采后进行公益性开发的项目,如财政资金较为充足,可采用EPC模式实施,如财政资金有一定的缺口,可采用ROT模式引进社会资本合作实施;对于垃圾开采后进行经营性开发的项目,较适合采用EOD模式实施。

关键词: 垃圾填埋场, 生态修复, 开采再利用, 商业模式

Abstract: Landfill is a traditional way to treat domestic waste in China. It had not only occupied large-scale land and space resources, but also posed long-term potential risks to the surrounding air, soil, groundwater, and residents’ living environment, which has been repeatedly notified by environmental protection inspectors. With the promotion of full coverage of incineration treatment, the renovation and utilization of existing waste landfills has gradually become a new task in many areas. First, the demand and practical exploration of landfill renovation and utilization were sorted out. Then the process, technical requirements, and application scope of the two main technical routes of ecological restoration and mining reuse were analyzed. Finally, three business models of EPC(engineering procurement construction), ROT(retrofit-operate-transfer) and EOD(ecology-oriented development) were proposed for the implementation of the project, and suggestions for their application were given. For projects using ecological restoration technology, the boundary conditions was generally clear and the business was non-profit, so the funds should be implemented from the local government financial budget, and the EPC mode could be adopted. For projects with public welfare development after waste mining, if the local government financial fund was sufficient, the EPC mode could be adopted, if the local government financial fund was insufficient, the ROT mode could be adopted to introduce private capital for cooperation. And the EOD mode was more suitable for the projects of business development after waste mining.

Key words: landfill, ecological remediation, exploitation and reuse, business model

[1] 葛恩燕, 胡 超. 生活垃圾填埋场开采筛分处置技术研究——以卧旗山垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(5): 88-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[5] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[6] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[7] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[8] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[9] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[10] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发