环境卫生工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 1-5,10.doi: 10.19841j.cnki.hjwsgc.2022.06.001

• 城乡生活垃圾填埋与二次污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

旱寒黄土区渗滤液灌溉蒸发影响因素初探

胡泸丹,邵立明,蒲红霞,王素君,魏新庆,何品晶   

  1. 1.天津建昌环保股份有限公司;2.同济大学 固体废物处理与资源化研究所
  • 出版日期:2023-01-04 发布日期:2023-01-04

Preliminary Study on Influencing Factors of Leachate Irrigation Evaporation in Arid Loess Area

HU Ludan1, SHAO Liming, PU Hongxia, WANG Sujun, WEI Xinqing, HE Pinjing   

  1. 1. Tianjin JC Environmental Services Co. Ltd.; 2. Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University
  • Online:2023-01-04 Published:2023-01-04

摘要: 旱寒黄土区蒸发量远高于降雨量,采用灌溉土质覆盖层方式蒸发减量是该区域填埋场渗滤液原位处理的可行途径。为探明蒸发减量的影响因素,在兰州某填埋场,通过模拟覆盖层研究渗滤液灌溉黄土的蒸发量与气象条件、灌溉强度(灌溉后土壤含水量)、渗滤液水质的相关性。结果表明,当地水面蒸发量(E1)主要与温度(T)、压强(P)、空气湿度(HUM)、风速(W)、降水量(R)和日照时长(S)相关,拟合方程为E1=12.529+0.256T-0.010P-0.062HUM+0.351W-0.007R+0.022S,纯水和渗滤液水面蒸发量存在线性关系;不同土壤含水量(25%、20%和15%)下,渗滤液灌溉的蒸发量随含水量减小而递减,25%含水量时蒸发量是非液化条件下的最大值;依据试验所在地气象数据计算得全年水面蒸发量为1 405.82 mm,渗滤液灌溉蒸发量为806.09 mm,单位面积黄土覆盖层全年可蒸发减量渗滤液约0.8 m3m2。

关键词: 土壤蒸发量, 水面蒸发量, 渗滤液回灌, 多元线性回归

Abstract: Evaporation is much higher than rainfall in arid loess area, evaporation reduction by irrigating soil cover was a feasible way to treat landfill leachate in situ in this area. In order to find out the influencing factors of evaporation reduction, the correlation between evaporation of loess irrigated by leachate and meteorological conditions, irrigation intensity (soil moisture content after irrigation) and leachate water quality were studied by simulating the cover layer in a landfill in Lanzhou. The results showed that the local water surface evaporation(E1) was mainly related to temperature(T), pressure(P), air humidity(HUM), wind speed(W), precipitation(R) and sunshine duration(S). The fitting equation was E1=12.529+0.256T-0.010P-0.062HUM+0.351W-0.007R+0.022S. There was a linear relationship between the water surface evaporation of pure water and leachate. Under different soil water content of 25%, 20% and 15%, the evaporation of leachate irrigation decreased with the decrease of water content, and the evaporation at 25% water content was the maximum under non-liquefaction conditions. According to the meteorological data of the test site, the annual water surface evaporation was 1 405.82 mm, and the leachate irrigation evaporation was 806.09 mm. The annual evaporation loss of leachate per unit area of loess overburden was about 0.8 m3m2.The efficient treatment of toilet black water and yellow water was an essential component of current wastewater treatment. According to the research process and treatment mode, the black water treatment technology could be divided into centralized black water treatment technology, dispersed black water treatment technology, emerging black water treatment technology and black water resource technologies. Most technologies, including biological, physicochemical, and other treatment methods, were focused on the treatment and recovery of nutrients due to the high concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus resources in source-separated yellow water. The different technical characteristics, principles, research status and application cases of black water and yellow water were summarized. And the corresponding development directions, such as source separation technology development, micro-pollutants advanced treatment and high-quality resource recovery were proposed.

Key words: soil evaporation, water surface evaporation, leachate recharge, multiple linear regression

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[5] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[6] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[7] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[8] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[9] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[10] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发