环境卫生工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 84-90.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2022.06.014

• 环境卫生管理与评价体系 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海市居民生活垃圾处理收费调查研究及对策建议

王 川,邰 俊,宋立杰,毕珠洁,欧阳创,奚 慧   

  1. 1. 上海环境卫生工程设计院有限公司;2.上海市环境工程设计科学研究院有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-01-04 发布日期:2023-01-04

Investigation and Research on the Charge of Residents for MSW Treatment and Countermeasures and Suggestions in Shanghai

WANG Chuan, TAI Jun, SONG Lijie, BI Zhujie, OUYANG Chuang, XI Hui   

  1. 1. Shanghai Environmental Sanitation Engineering Design Institute Co. Ltd.; 2. Shanghai Institute of Environmental Engineering and Design Science Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-01-04 Published:2023-01-04

摘要: 基于我国全面建立生活垃圾处理收费制度的现实需求,开展上海市居民对生活垃圾处理收费的支付意愿(WTP)调查等基础性研究。结果表明:国外垃圾处理收费多采用计量征收模式,我国以定额征收或水消费系数法为主。本研究中60%以上的受访者对垃圾分类工作十分关注,且认为居民投放环节至关重要;此外居民生活垃圾处理的WTP金额为18.20元/(月·户),与受访者收入和本地户籍正相关,与受访者年龄负相关。结合目前的收费理论、政策及操作层面的可行性,提出了上海市开征居民生活垃圾收费的相关对策建议,仅采用定额收费可能难以起到良好的生活垃圾源头减量效果;而水消费系数法随水征收执行简便且能保证较高收缴率和较低收缴成本,具备一定可操作性。现阶段实施按量征收不仅需要投入资金升级配套设备而且可能会给垃圾分类工作开展带来负面效应。研究成果可为上海市正式开征居民生活垃圾收费提供基础资料和决策参考,有利于促进生活垃圾全程分类体系制度的进一步完善。

关键词: 生活垃圾, 水消费系数法, 按量收费, 支付意愿

Abstract: Based on the practical needs of comprehensively establishment of the charge system of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment in China, basic research such as the investigation of residents’ willingness to pay (WTP) in Shanghai was carried out. The results showed that waste treatment charges were mostly paid as you throw in foreign countries, while it was dominated by flat rate charging or water consumption coefficient in China. More than 60% of the respondents in this study paid close attention to the waste classification work, and thought that the residents’ dumping of waste played important role. In addition, the respondents’ WTP for the MSW treatment was 18.2 RMB per month per household, which was positively correlated with income and domiciliary register, and negatively correlated with age. Combined with the feasibility of current charging theory, policy and operation, relevant countermeasures and suggestions for establishing residents’ MSW charges in Shanghai were proposed. It may be difficult to achieve a satisfied effect of MSW source reduction only by adopting the flat rate charging. While the water consumption coefficient method was easy to implement, which could ensure a higher charge rate and lower charge cost, thus had certain operability. The implementation of pay as throw not only required investment in upgrading supporting equipment, but also may bring negative effects to the development of waste classification. The research results could provide basic data and decision-making reference to formally establishing residents’ MSW charges in Shanghai, which could conducive to further improve the whole process classification system of MSW.

Key words: municipal solid waste, water consumption coefficient method, pay as you throw, willingness to pay

[1] 石凯军, 蹇瑞欢. 现有生活垃圾焚烧厂掺烧工业固废及其垃圾池管理分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 28-33.
[2] 赵爱华, 邰 俊, 车 越, 李光明, 钱光人, 毕珠洁. 上海生活源可回收物资源化特点分析及协同管理机制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 70-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[5] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[6] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[7] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[8] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[9] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[10] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发