环境卫生工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 58-63.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2022.06.010

• 危险废物利用、处理与处置 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种医疗废物应急协同处置技术的生命周期评价

赵宇轩,魏国侠,刘汉桥,赵海龙,李 通,龚永月,乔浩宇   

  1. 1. 天津城建大学 能源与安全工程学院;2. 天津城建大学 理学院;3. 清华大学 环境学院
  • 出版日期:2023-01-04 发布日期:2023-01-04

Life Cycle Assessment of Two Emergency Co-Disposal Technologies of Medical Waste

ZHAO Yuxuan, WEI Guoxia, LIU Hanqiao, ZHAO Hailong,LI Tong, GONG Yongyue, QIAO Haoyu   

  1. 1. School of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University; 2. School of Science, Tianjin Chengjian University; 3. School of Environment, Tsinghua University
  • Online:2023-01-04 Published:2023-01-04

摘要: 新冠疫情暴发导致医疗废物数量激增,疫情严重地区的医疗废物产生量远超其已有处置能力,其处置成为阻止疫情蔓延的关键环节。对医疗废物分别与危险废物和生活垃圾协同焚烧两种应急处置技术的特点、环境风险及技术适应性进行比较,并通过生命周期评价方法量化比较两种技术的环境影响和关键因素。结果表明:与生活垃圾协同焚烧技术由于发电而具有显著的环境效益;与危险废物协同焚烧,可有效避免二英类物质二次合成,但该技术因能耗高而对环境影响大。对后者的情景优化表明能源回收效率提高63.6%、节能减排指标降低了21.9%。研究结果可为医疗废物应急管理和可持续发展提供参考。

关键词:  医疗废物, 生命周期评价, 应急处置技术, 协同焚烧, 能量回收分析

Abstract: The COVID-19 epidemic has led to a surge of the amount of medical waste, and the generation amount of medical waste in severely affected areas far exceeded their existing disposal capacity. Disposal of medical waste become a key link to prevent epidemic spreading. The characteristics, environmental risks and technical adaptability of two medical waste emergency co-disposal technologies including co-incineration with hazardous waste and domestic waste respectively were compared. The environmental impacts and key factors of the two technologies were evaluated and compared via life cycle assessment. The results showed that co-incineration with domestic waste has significant environmental benefits due to power generation. While co-incineration with hazardous waste could effectively avoid the secondary synthesis of dioxins, but had a great impact on the environment due to high energy consumption. Scenario analysis of co-incineration with hazardous waste showed that the energy recovery efficiency increased by 63.6%, energy conservation and emission reduction targets reduced by 21.9%. The results of the study could provide recommendations for the emergency management and sustainable development of medical waste.

Key words: medical waste, life cycle assessment, emergency disposal techniques, co-incineration, energy recovery analysis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 龑 陈海滨 杨 禹 等. 基于F-measure的生活垃圾分类效果评价指标优化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 1 -3 .
[2] 陈美珠. 广州市提高生活垃圾分类效果的探索与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 4 -7 .
[3] 胡鑫鑫. 杭州市餐厨垃圾预处理技术的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 8 -10 .
[4] 赖后伟 喻友华 陈 浩 等. 我国村镇生活垃圾简易填埋场特点及治理方案选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 11 -13 .
[5] 刘志永 郑泽华. 生活垃圾焚烧发电协同处置市政污泥技术研究——以衡阳市为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 14 -17 .
[6] 程 曦 朱 广 徐 辉 等. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣的工程特性[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 18 -22 .
[7] 孔红. 生活垃圾焚烧厂SNCR脱硝系统的自动控制[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 23 -25 .
[8] 张静. 北京六里屯垃圾填埋场填埋气利用途径与效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 26 -28 .
[9] 鲁晓菊 杨 迪 姚俊花. 太原市生活垃圾热值影响因素研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 29 -32 .
[10] 王占磊 陈 丽 刘兰英 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨氮的抑制浓度和消除方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 33 -35 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发