Environmental Sanitation Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 68-78,86.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Odor Pollution Characterization and Health Risk Assessment of An Animal Innocuous Treatment Plant

JIANG Weiwei,YANG Hong,YIN Jianxiang   

  1. 1.Shanghai Municipal Animal Innocuous Treatment Centre; 2. Shanghai Jianke Environmental Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

Abstract: Based on the monitoring data of odor generation sources, discharge outfalls and boundaries of an animal innocuous treatment plant in Shanghai, its odor pollution characteristics were explored and its impact on the surrounding environment and human health was further evaluated. The results showed that the main sources of odor were the corruption of animal carcasses (incineration workshop) and the microbial activities of sewage treatment (sewage station). The main odor pollutants were hydrogen sulfide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), dimethyl disulfide (C2H6S2) and methanethiol (CH3SH), with the maximum source contents of 5.710, 2.462, 0.659 and 0.292 mg/m3, respectively. The incineration workshop was the major contributor of NH3, while the sewage station was the major contributor of H2S. The contents at the outfalls and boundaries satisfied the standards of DB 31/1025—2016 Emission Standards of Odor Pollutants. The main odor-causing factors were H2S, CH3SH, C2H6S2 and NH3, with the maximum threshold dilution times of 9 154, 1 496, 57 and 50, respectively. Comparison of the monitoring data revealed that there were low olfactory threshold factors other than NH3, H2S and CH3SH at the outfalls and boundaries, which were not included in the routine monitoring program. Subsequent consideration should be given to increasing the routine monitoring factors and monitoring frequency to better monitor the odor emission and its impact. Although the odor substance contents in the workshop were lower than the occupational exposure limit, non-carcinogenic risks were identified with the risk index ranged from 4.481 to 1 956.440. The limited space in the workshop should be strictly controlled, and incoming operators should be equipped with protective equipment. The normal operation of the waste gas treatment facilities must be ensured, preventing leakage and protecting health risks from staff.

Key words: animal innocuous treatment, incineration, odor pollutants, health risk

[1] QIU Qingwen. Suggestions on Geotechnical Engineering Design of Domestic Waste Incineration Fly Ash Landfill [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[2] HU Honglei, LONG Jisheng, WU Yazhong. Corrosion Causes and Optimization Scheme for Flue Gas Recirculation Equipment in Waste to Energy Incineration Plants [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 97-101.
[3] DUAN Panqiao, LI Yaxin, BAI Liangcheng. White Smoke Generation Source and Control in Domestic Waste Incineration Plants [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[4] FU Kai, BAI Xu, SHI Jiayu, QIAN Xinxin, LIU Lu, ZHOU Yaqian, WANG Heli. Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Domestic Waste Incineration Based on the Entire Process [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[5] QI Xiaobo, YI Peng, MA Yunfeng, LIN Xiaoqing. Study on the Combustion Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste Influenced by Large Proportion of Typical Industrial Solid Waste in a Solid Waste Incinerator [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[6] QI Jianan, ZHOU Shuo, NING Qing, WANG Huan, LI Bing, LIU Haiwei. Technical-economic Analysis of SRF Preparation Processes from Municipal Solid Waste in County Area of China [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(1): 23-31.
[7] YAN Haowen, ZHANG Bei, WANG Zhiqiang, LONG Jisheng, JIN Xingqian, GUO Xinwei. Engineering Practice and Analysis of Exhaust Gas Recirculation Technology for Waste Incineration Power Generation Project [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2025, 33(1): 98-102.
[8] DUAN Feifei, ZHU Chuanqiang, YANG Lin, HU Mingdong, YIN Xiaolong, HAN Hao. Research on the Integrated Process of Desulfurization and Denitrification in a Large-capacity Waste Incinerator [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 64-69.
[9] GONG Yue. Research and Application of Shock Pulse Generators Ash Cleaning Technology for Waste Incineration Boiler Heating Surface [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 74-79.
[10] GAN Jie, LIU Hao, LI Jianhui. Comparative Analysis of Discharge and Regulatory Standards on Effluents from Waste Incineration Plants in China and Developed Countries [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 11-16.
[11] YU Yaping. Technical and Economic Analysis of Sludge Incineration Flue Gas Deacidification Process [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(5): 87-92.
[12] LYU Yejia, ZHANG Jia, YUE Yang, QIAN Guangren. Progress and Prospect of Deep Recycling Technology for Incineration Fly Ash [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 1-8.
[13] TIAN Wei, CHEN Cong, PENG Li, CHEN Yucheng. Pollution Characterization and Environmental Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal of Waste Incineration Fly Ash and its Solidified / Stabilized Products [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[14] CHEN Lu, YANG Dekun, LONG Jisheng. Study on Synergistic Removal Characteristics of Multiple Pollutants in Domestic Waste Incineration Plant by Integrated Flue Gas Purification Process [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 51-57.
[15] WANG Yantao, LONG Jisheng, QIN Feng. Statistical Analysis of Design Parameters and Incineration Load Variation of Waste Incineration Power Plant [J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 58-62,71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Environmental Sanitation Engineering
Address: 107#, Weidi Road, Tianjin, P.R.C.    Postcode: 300201
Telephone: 022-28365069   Fax: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech