环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1-10.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.06.001

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市生活垃圾与陈腐垃圾掺烧的燃烧特性与反应动力学分析

孙子维,张雨轩,唐玉婷,王思琪,唐杰洪,马晓茜   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 电力学院;2.华南理工大学 广东省能源高效清洁利用重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2024-01-05 发布日期:2024-01-05

Combustion Characteristics and Kinetic Analysis of the Co-combustion of MSW and Excavated Waste

SUN Ziwei, ZHANG Yuxuan, TANG Yuting, WANG Siqi, TANG Jiehong, MA Xiaoqian   

  1. 1. School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology; 2. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency and Clean Utilization, South China University of Technology
  • Online:2024-01-05 Published:2024-01-05

摘要: 城市生活垃圾掺烧陈腐垃圾可以同时实现二者的资源化利用。使用热重分析法研究城市生活垃圾掺烧陈腐垃圾的燃烧过程,并根据获得的热特性曲线,计算陈腐垃圾掺混比为100%、75%、50%、25%以及0的样品的燃烧特性参数。运用Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose法(KAS法)、Coats-Redfern积分法(C-R法)探究掺烧的动力学特性,依据拟合校正系数(adjR2)来评价计算模型的拟合效果与适应性。结果表明,陈腐垃圾掺混比上升时,样品的着火特征指数下降,而燃尽特征指数和综合燃烧特征指数均呈现出先升后降的趋势。在实验条件下,燃尽特征指数和综合燃烧特征指数的优势掺混比例为0~50%,并且综合燃烧特征指数在掺混比为25%时达到峰值。随陈腐垃圾掺混比增大,KAS法计算出的全局活化能呈递减趋势,从244.49 kJ/mol降至79.40 kJ/mol,其adjR2从0.936 6 升为0.988 9; 而C-R法计算出的全局活化能呈递增趋势,从20.86 kJ/mol升至34.21 kJ/mol,其adjR2从0.985 0升为0.997 5。对两种动力学模型的拟合曲线与实验数据进行对比可知,KAS法的拟合曲线在高温燃烧段存在一定的失真现象,总体而言C-R法的拟合效果更为优秀。

关键词: 热重分析, 陈腐垃圾, 城市生活垃圾, 燃烧特性, 动力学

Abstract: The blending of MSW with aged waste could realize the resource utilization of both at the same time. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to study the combustion process of MSW blended with aged wastes. The combustion characteristics parameters of samples with 100%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0 blending ratios of aged waste were calculated based on the thermal characteristic curves obtained. Further, the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method (KAS method) and Coats-Redfern integral method (C-R method) were applied to investigate the kinetic properties of the blending, and the fitting effectiveness and adaptability of the computational model were evaluated based on the fitting correction factor (adjR2). The results showed that the ignition characteristic index of the samples decreased when the mixing ratio of aged waste increased, while the burnout characteristic index and the integrated combustion characteristic index both showed a tendency of first increased and then decreased. Under the experimental conditions, the dominant mixing ratios of the burnout characteristic index and the integrated combustion characteristic index were 0~50%, and the integrated combustion characteristic index reached the peak at the mixing ratio of 25%. With the increase of the blending ratio of aged waste, the global activation energy calculated by the KAS method showed a decreasing trend from 244.49 kJ/mol to 79.40 kJ/mol, and its adjR2 increased from 0.936 6 to 0.988 9; and the global activation energy calculated by the C-R method showed an increasing trend from 20.86 kJ/mol to 34.21 kJ/mol, while its adjR2 increased from 0.985 0 to 0.997 5. Comparing the fitting curves of the two kinetic models with the experimental data, it could be seen that the fitting curve of the KAS method had some distortion in the high temperature combustion section, and the fitting effect of the C-R method was better in general.

Key words: thermogravimetric analysis, excavated waste, municipal solid waste, combustion characteristics, kinetic analysis

[1] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[2] 王 川, 王慧爽, 邰 俊, 毕珠洁, 范帅康, 宋小龙. 源头分类对生活垃圾处理碳排放和减排效果的影响研究——以上海市干湿垃圾分类为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 140-140.
[3] 陈明曦, 卢永明, 王 健, 张 劲, 王孝峰, 周 顺, 葛少林, 李爱民, 姬国钊. 卷烟燃烧过程减害降焦研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 77-86.
[4] 阚宝鹏, 齐文静, 张文霞, 尹新龙, 冯新荣, 姜 震, 郑伟萍. 垃圾分类背景下青岛市生活垃圾组分与特性变化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 34-38.
[5] 王湘徽, 朱 悦, 陈润生. 填埋场陈腐垃圾筛上物热值及掺烧对焚烧炉运行工况影响研究——以云南省某市陈腐垃圾掺烧为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 53-62.
[6] 黄乃先, 陈 晨, 孔 斌. 用于陈腐垃圾处置的精细化筛分工艺——以某垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 9-13.
[7] 杨 航, 高利俊, 杨 竹, 胡丽萍, 李 波, 赵 明. 汽车破碎残留物可燃组分热解过程交互作用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 21-27,36.
[8] 徐 伟, 高 婷, 殷 进. 厨余垃圾厌氧沼渣热解特性及动力学分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 37-44.
[9] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[10] 王 雷. 城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂优化设计思考[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 51-59.
[11] 夏 宇, 杨天学, 朱能敏, 李 东, 陈则良, 郎乾乾, 刘振刚, 焦文涛. 改性水热炭对铅的吸附模型及机理分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 126-126.
[12] 汪 洋, 胡 竣, 余春江, 徐方利. 西南地区某垃圾填埋场矿化型陈腐垃圾性质及资源化利用方法[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 36-40,45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发