环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 51-59.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.05.008

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂优化设计思考

王 雷   

  1. 上海环境工程建设项目管理有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-10-27 发布日期:2023-10-27

Consideration on the Optimization Design of Waste to Energy Plants

WANG Lei   

  1. Shanghai Environmental Engineering Construction Project Management Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-10-27 Published:2023-10-27

摘要: 针对城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂主厂房建筑面积、混凝土配筋量、桩基优化、渗滤液原液回喷、主蒸汽参数选择、在线吹灰组合模式、厂用电率等7个关键设计要素,从降本增效的角度提出了中小型生活垃圾焚烧发电厂优化设计思路。通过多个典型案例的技术经济指标比对与分析,形成了500 t/d×1和500 t/d×2规模的生活垃圾焚烧发电厂7个设计推荐应用模式或典型控制值。其中:主厂房面积宜控制在12 000~19 000 m2,主厂房混凝土配筋量宜控制在160~195 kg/m3,通过合理的桩型选择和试桩优化可以节约25%以上桩基投资,渗滤液原液回喷单条焚烧线可降低渗滤液处理系统30 t/d设计规模,主蒸汽宜选用450 ℃、6.4 MPa的中温次高压参数,余热锅炉宜采取“水喷淋吹灰+蒸汽吹灰+激波吹灰”的在线吹灰组合模式,厂用电率宜控制在14%~18%。

关键词: 城市生活垃圾, 焚烧厂, 优化设计, 降本, 增效

Abstract: According to seven key design elements of the main factory building floor area, concrete reinforcement amount, pile foundation optimization, leachate spraying, main steam parameter selection, on-line soot blowing combined mode and station service power consumption rate of municipal solid waste incineration power plant, the optimization design ideas for the construction of new waste to energy plant were proposed from the angle of cost reduction and efficiency increase. Through the comparison and analysis of technical and economic indexes of several typical projects, seven recommended application modes or typical control values were formed on the optimization design of waste to energy plants with the scale of 500 t/d×1 and 500 t/d×2. Among which, main factory building floor area should be controlled at 12 000~19 000 m2, concrete reinforcement amount of main factory building should be controlled at 160~195 kg/m3, more than 25% of the pile foundation investment could be saved by selecting reasonable pile types and optimizing pile testing. Leachate spraying was applied to an incineration line, which could reduce leachate treatment system scale by 30 t/d,medium temperature and sub-high pressure parameters of 450 ℃ and 6.4 MPa should be applied to main steam. On-line soot blowing combined mode of “water spray soot blowing+steam soot blowing+shockwave soot blowing” should be applied to waste heat boiler, and the station service power consumption rate should be controlled at 14%~18%.

Key words: municipal solid waste, incineration plant, optimization design, cost reduction, efficiency increase

[1] 王慧慧, 王 领, 朱旻航, 连宋剑. 我国厨余垃圾处理设施现状及处理成本分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 12-18.
[2] 王 川, 王慧爽, 邰 俊, 毕珠洁, 范帅康, 宋小龙. 源头分类对生活垃圾处理碳排放和减排效果的影响研究——以上海市干湿垃圾分类为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 140-140.
[3] 黄 华, 黄正鹏, 沈元鹏, 李 浓. 生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液全量化处理技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 78-82.
[4] 邓飞飞, 张栋棚, 郑仁栋, 周纬南, 吴迪迪, 吕媛媛. 杭州市生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液季节性变化特征研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 90-93.
[5] 阚宝鹏, 齐文静, 张文霞, 尹新龙, 冯新荣, 姜 震, 郑伟萍. 垃圾分类背景下青岛市生活垃圾组分与特性变化研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 34-38.
[6] 陆广博, 罗院生, 艾 扬, 李 松. 北京市某生活垃圾焚烧厂应急处置涉疫生活垃圾案例分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 45-49.
[7] 孙子维, 张雨轩, 唐玉婷, 王思琪, 唐杰洪, 马晓茜. 城市生活垃圾与陈腐垃圾掺烧的燃烧特性与反应动力学分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 1-10.
[8] 何伟煜. 城市生活垃圾处理行业温室气体减排机会分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 9-17.
[9] 缪 巍, 夏 宇, 张永禄, 王松涛, 陈运启, 陈则良. 生活垃圾焚烧厂第三方监管模式及未来发展趋势分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 88-93.
[10] 秦 浩, 马长永. 生活垃圾渗滤液膜浓缩液全量化处理工艺应用分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 108-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发