环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 95-100.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.02.015

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理项目及运行优势分析

杨德坤,龙吉生,刘殊嘉   

  1. 上海康恒环境股份有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-25

Case Study and Operational Advantage Analysis of Food Waste Co-processing in Eco-Industrial Park

YANG Dekun, LONG Jisheng, LIU Shujia   

  1. Shanghai SUS Environment Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 针对餐厨垃圾处理项目存在投资运行成本高、占地面积大、盈利难等问题,提出静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理模式,即餐厨垃圾处理项目依托生活垃圾焚烧厂建设,采用“预处理+协同处理”工艺实现与生活垃圾焚烧厂的协同处理。以山东省某静脉产业园内餐厨垃圾协同处理项目为例,介绍了以“物料接收+分拣+制浆+除砂除杂+三相提油”为主体的餐厨垃圾预处理工艺,分析了运行数据,比较了协同处理与单独厌氧两种工艺的运行经济性及碳减排情况。结果表明:该项目预处理工艺运行稳定,运行期间设备产能可达到11 t/h,油脂、残渣和浆液平均产率分别为2.87%、36.56%和74.40%;水、电、蒸汽吨垃圾耗量基本满足设计要求,平均耗量分别为0.09 t、18.93 kWh、0.06 t;100 t/d餐厨垃圾协同处理较单独厌氧处理优势明显,运行费用可节省36.30%;与单独厌氧处理相比,协同处理节省电力约237.17 MWh/a,折合碳减排量可达168.84 tCO2e/a。静脉产业园餐厨垃圾协同处理模式可作为后续餐厨垃圾处理项目推荐采用的优选方案。

关键词: 餐厨垃圾, 静脉产业园, 协同处理, 单独厌氧, 运行优势

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of high investment and operation cost, large area occupied, and difficulty in making profits in the food waste treatment project, a co-processing mode of food waste in the eco-industrial park was proposed in this study. The food waste treatment project relied on the construction of municipal solid waste incineration plant and adopts the “pretreatment + co-processing” process to realize the collaborative treatment with the municipal solid waste incineration plant. A food waste co-processing project in an eco-industrial park in Shandong was taken as an example, the food waste pre-treatment process with “material receiving + sorting + pulping + sand removal and impurity removal + three-phase oil extraction” as the main body was introduced. The operating data was analyzed, the operating economics and carbon emission reductions of the two processes of co-processing and independent anaerobic were compared. The results showed that the pre-treatment process of the project was stable. During the operation, the equipment production capacity could reach about 11 t/h, the average yields of grease, residue and slurry were 2.87%, 36.56%, and 74.40% respectively. The waste consumption per ton of water, electricity, and steam basically met the design requirements, and the average consumption were 0.09 t, 18.93 kWh, and 0.06 t respectively. The 100 t/d food waste co-processing had obvious advantages over independent anaerobic treatment, the operating cost could be saved by 36.30%. Compared with the independent anaerobic treatment, co-processing saved about 237.17 MWh/a of electricity, and the equivalent carbon emission reduction could reach about 168.84 tCO2e/a. The co-processing mode of food waste in the eco-industrial park could be used as the recommended optimal solution for subsequent food waste treatment projects.

Key words: food waste, eco-industrial park, co-processing, independent anaerobic, operational advantages

[1] 许家辉, 刘 超, 乐亮亮, 苏 醒, 陈卫华, 吴 健. 气液射流搅拌工艺在餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵工程的应用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 78-84.
[2] 李国庆. 基于黑水虻虫卵自供给的养殖优化及经济效益分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 50-56.
[3] 张 力, 李 科, 朱雅萍, 吴 元, 杨虎君. 餐厨垃圾碟式分离制备碳源及其应用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 62-66.
[4] 陈佳新, 崔理慧, 延一鸣, 吉星星, 费 强, 马英群. 原位制备混合菌基复合酶强化餐厨垃圾定向水解和厌氧消化:效能、机制、微生物群落和全局代谢通路[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 128-128.
[5] 周永泉, 李小伟, 邰 俊. 低剂量纸巾添加对餐厨垃圾和厨余垃圾共消化的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 36-43.
[6] 欧阳创, 张余镕, 邰 俊, 徐先宝, 薛 罡, 李 响. 沼渣水热炭与沼渣热解炭强化餐厨垃圾厌氧消化对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 47-53.
[7] 刘彦君, 汤倩格, 王 盛, 李振坤, 王建兵. 校园餐厨垃圾初期降解生物气溶胶释放特征及健康风险研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 57-67.
[8] 刘 硕, 汪群慧, 李 媛, 马晓宇, 朱文彬, 王锘涵, 孙海曙, 高 明. 餐厨垃圾开放式高效定向乳酸生物转化:微生物群落变化及生物固碳效能分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 127-127.
[9] 杜学勋, 史晶晶, 张斯颖. 生物强化促进餐厨垃圾高温厌氧消化产甲烷性能的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 46-53.
[10] 孟 伟, 于 超, 范晓平, 刘 岩, 褚昭涵, 苏红玉. 东南沿海地区典型餐厨垃圾处理工程设计及运行实例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(5): 28-34.
[11] 杨 娜, 王 巧, 吕 凡, 余波平, 徐期勇, 何品晶. 我国家庭厨余垃圾与餐厨垃圾理化性质对比分析——源头分类的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 7-16.
[12] 蓝苑瑗, 吴 松, 王 磊. 物料调理缓解餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化效应及其机制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 27-34.
[13] 董成耀, 顾 霞, 赵 磊, 周永泉, 李 响. 餐厨垃圾厌氧生物转化预处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 24-32.
[14] 高 振, 马英群, 刘 雨, 汪群慧. 餐饮废油作为碳源用于微生物油脂生产:促进还是抑制?[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 125-125.
[15] 屈 阳, 李月中, 朱卫兵, 吴 元, 朱丽可, 王伟平. 回料对餐厨垃圾二步法堆肥处理效果的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(1): 16-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发