环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 1-7,14.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.02.001

• 城乡生活垃圾填埋与二次污染控制 •    下一篇

四川典型红层区生活垃圾填埋场衬层土壤防渗性能研究

刘 磊,韩智勇,何 山,冯诗杰,胡馨然   

  1. 1. 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室(成都理工大学);2.国家环境保护水土污染协同控制与联合修复重点实验室(成都理工大学);3.成都理工大学 生态环境学院;4.四川嘉盛裕环保技术有限公司
  • 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-25

Research on Anti-seepage Performance of Liner Soil of Landfill in Typical Red Layer Areas of Sichuan Province

LIU Lei, HAN Zhiyong, HE Shan, FENG Shijie, HU Xinran   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection(Chengdu University of Technology); 2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution (Chengdu University of Technology); 3. College of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology; 4. Sichuan Jiashengyu Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 填埋场衬层土壤大多取自附近土壤,衬层的防污性能与土壤的渗透特性密切相关。通过对四川省典型红层区填埋场附近不同深度的6种粒径区间的筛分土样开展标准固结试验,研究红层区土壤的基本物理参数、压缩固结过程中饱和密度以及渗透系数的变化趋势和规律。试验结果表明:固结前期(P ≤800 kPa),红层筛分土饱和密度(ρsat)变化范围为0.13~0.25 g/cm3,固结后期(800 kPa<P<3 200 kPa)为0.11~0.18 g/cm3,且均呈对数增加,同时,ρsat与孔隙比e两者之间呈强线性负相关(r>0.99)。筛分红层土的压缩固结主要集中于12.5~800 kPa的竖向压力区间。竖向压力大于800 kPa时,红层筛分粉黏土适合作为填埋场防渗系统中的土壤衬层。同时,基于已有的lgkv-lge渗透模型,提出了2种适用于不同粒径区间红层土的lgkv-lgρsat线性及非线性拟合渗透模型,以期为我国红层区填埋场等工程建设项目的选址、地下水污染的评价和修复提供一定的理论依据。

关键词: 红层, 衬层土壤, 饱和密度, 防渗性能, 填埋场

Abstract: The soil of landfill liners was derived mainly from nearby area. There was a close correlation between the antipollution capacity of liners and soil permeability. The standard consolidation experiment was carried out on the sieved soil with six particle size ranges at different depths near the typical red-layer landfill in Sichuan Province, so as to study the fundamental physical parameters and the trend of changes in saturated density and permeability coefficient. According to the experimental results, the saturated density of red-layer sieved soil(ρsat) ranged from 0.13 to 0.25 g/cm3 at the early consolidation stage (P≤800 kPa), and it was from 0.11 to 0.18 g/cm3 at the later stage (800 kPa<P<3 200 kPa), both showed a trend of logarithmical increase. Besides, there was a significant linear negative correlation between the ρsat and the void ratio e (r>0.99). The consolidation of sieved soil in the red layer was mainly concentrated in the vertical pressure range from 12.5 to 800 kPa. When the vertical pressure exceeded 800 kPa, the sieved silty clay in the red layer was applicable as the soil-protecting layer in the impervious system of landfill. Meanwhile, based on the existed seepage model(lgkv-lge), two types of linear and nonlinear fitting seepage models(lgkv-lgρsat) were constructed for the red-layer soil with different particle sizes. It was expected to provide a theoretical guidance on site selection of construction projects such as landfills in the red layer areas, as well as the pollution assessment and remediation of groundwater in China.

Key words: red layer, liner soil, saturated density, anti-seepage performance, landfill

[1] 孟凡跃. 某大型老旧垃圾填埋场地下水修复工程设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 56-63.
[2] 曹占强. 存量垃圾快速好氧稳定化装备研究及工程应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 75-81.
[3] 张宗建, 周 锋, 卜庆国, 张 姣. 竖向改建生活垃圾填埋场沉降研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 110-116.
[4] 元妙新, 葛恩燕, 占 升, 徐华锺, 陈 欢. 垃圾填埋场快速通风预处理的工艺设计及探索[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 95-101.
[5] 施至理. 小型简易垃圾填埋场开挖筛分工艺流程分析和参数确定——以浙江某小型简易垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 102-109.
[6] 武海军, 沈 峰, 李万金, 张泽林, 曹 建, 李菁若. 陈年垃圾腐殖土理化性质及无侧限抗压强度研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 28-35.
[7] 梁智飞, 祝雄涛. 注氧稳定化预处理技术在生活垃圾卫生填埋场存量垃圾开挖中的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 90-95.
[8] 王心月, 黄兴瑶, 智 悦, 刘雪梅, 王 前, 岳东北, 王小铭. 食品接触材料全氟和多氟化合物浸出行为及其处置场景释放潜力研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 128-128.
[9] 陈 华, 何耀忠, 刘 帅, 刘 畅, 杨嘉杰. 大型生活垃圾填埋场阶段性封场综合整治工程——以广东省某市生活垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 93-98.
[10] 商卫纯, 王丽晓, 郑 吉, 刁鲁懿. 浙江省某非正规垃圾填埋场调查及风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 99-103,111.
[11] 项显超, 蔡嘉瑞, 甄宗傲, 李晓东. 填埋场开采及矿化垃圾资源化利用现状[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 16-27.
[12] 施瑾瑾. 开挖的非正规填埋场重(类)金属污染及潜在生态环境风险分析——以嘉善县某填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 78-83.
[13] 宋树祥, 齐 添, 胡良军, 张效刚, 陈彬荣, 张玉飞. 基于无人机和深度学习的大型垃圾填埋场覆膜病害智能识别方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 1-9.
[14] 黄乃先, 陈 晨, 孔 斌. 用于陈腐垃圾处置的精细化筛分工艺——以某垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 9-13.
[15] 刘超然, 江文琛, 张海静, 王 磊, 黄 晟. 华东地区非正规垃圾填埋场开挖筛分治理工程案例分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(1): 14-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发