餐厨垃圾,厌氧发酵,酸化,恢复,预警参数 ," /> 餐厨垃圾,厌氧发酵,酸化,恢复,预警参数 ,"/> food waste,anaerobic ,fermentation,acidification,recovery,Warning parameters ,"/> <p class="MsoNormal"> <span>进料负荷调整对餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化及恢复的影响研究</span>

环境卫生工程

• •    下一篇

进料负荷调整对餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化及恢复的影响研究

  

  1. 福州中城科再生资源利用有限公司

Study on the effect of feed loading adjustment on anaerobic fermentation acidification and recovery of kitchen waste

  1. FuZhou ZCK Utilization of Renewable Co.Ltd.

摘要:

目前餐厨垃圾最主流的处理技术是厌氧发酵产沼气,但如果运营不当易发生酸化。本文探究了进料负荷变化导致餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化的特点及酸化预警指标,并通过“降低进料负荷+Na2CO3调理”的方式消除酸化并恢复发酵,分析了发酵过程的变化特性。结果表明,15d内进料负荷提高31.3%会导致厌氧系统酸化,单位产气量、总碱度(ALK)、挥发性脂肪酸(VFAVFA/ALK的变化较系统酸化分别提前了42d40d28d28d,可作为酸化预警指标,其中单位产气量最为敏感;当酸化预警参数的数值偏离稳定运行正常范围时应启动预警;酸化过程中,单位产气量、ALK、甲烷含量和pH最低分别降至520.4m3/tVS/d7400mg/L49%6.98,较初始下降了66%27%19%10.5%VFAVFA/ALK最高分别到5960mg/L0.8,较初始上升了674%952%通过“降低进料负荷+ Na2CO3调理”可逐渐解除酸化;从调整进料负荷导致酸化到解除酸化历经了86d,期间连续33d降低进料负荷,消耗纯碱4320kg,具有较高的可行性和经济性;恢复过程中,按甲烷含量、单位产气量、pHVFAVFA/ALKALK排序先后逐渐好转;当VFAVFA/ALK分别降至2000mg/L0.25以内时酸化预警解除,可作为酸化恢复的观测指标;在稳定运行、酸化及恢复过程中,各指标在0.01显著水平下均有显著关系性。本文旨在为其他工程化应用的餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化的预警及恢复提供参考,助力在实际工程化应用中的运营管控。

关键词:

餐厨垃圾')">"> 餐厨垃圾, 厌氧发酵, 酸化, 恢复, 预警参数

Abstract:

Anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production is currently the predominant treatment technology for food waste. However, improper operation can readily induce acidification. This study investigated the characteristics of acidification in food waste anaerobic digestion triggered by variations in organic loading rate (OLR), identified early-warning indicators for acidification, and evaluated the effectiveness of the "OLR reduction + Na?CO? supplementation" strategy for acidification mitigation and process recovery. Changes in digestion performance during these phases were comprehensively analyzed.The results demonstrate that increasing the OLR by 31.3% within 15 d induced system acidification. Significant precursors to acidification were observed in specific parameters: the specific biogas production (SBP), total alkalinity (ALK), volatile fatty acids (VFA), and the VFA/ALK ratio exhibited abnormal deviations 42 d, 40 d, 28 d, and 28 d, respectively, prior to the onset of acute acidification. These parameters thus serve as effective early-warning indicators, with SBP exhibiting the highest sensitivity. An early-warning protocol should be initiated when these parameters deviate from their stable operational ranges.During acidification, critical parameters reached their extremes: SBP, ALK, methane (CH?) content, and pH decreased to 520.4 m3/tVS/d, 7400 mg/L, 49%, and 6.98, respectively, representing declines of 66%, 27%, 19%, and 10.5% from initial baseline values. Conversely, VFA and VFA/ALK peaked at 5960 mg/L and 0.8, reflecting increases of 674% and 952%, respectively.Acidification was gradually reversed through the combined strategy of reducing OLR and supplementing Na?CO?. The entire cycle, from OLR-induced acidification to complete recovery, spanned 86 d. During this period, the feed load was reduced for 33 consecutive days, consuming 4,320kg of soda ash, demonstrating high feasibility and cost-effectiveness.Recovery dynamics revealed a sequential restoration of parameters: CH? content improved first, followed by SBP, pH, VFA, VFA/ALK, and finally ALK. Acidification was confirmed to be resolved, and the early-warning status lifted, once VFA and VFA/ALK stabilized below thresholds of 2000 mg/L and 0.25, respectively, establishing these as robust indicators for recovery monitoring.Statistical analysis confirmed significant correlations (p<0.01) among all monitored parameters throughout the stable operation, acidification, and recovery phases. This study provides valuable insights for implementing early-warning systems and recovery protocols for acidification in full-scale food waste anaerobic digestion plants, aiding operational management in practical engineering applications.

Key words:

food waste')">"> food waste, anaerobic , fermentation, acidification, recovery, Warning parameters

[1] 许家辉, 刘 超, 乐亮亮, 苏 醒, 陈卫华, 吴 健. 气液射流搅拌工艺在餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵工程的应用研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 78-84.
[2] 秦胜男. 湿垃圾浆液制备碳源预处理组合技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 57-63.
[3] 田启欢, 高彦达, 宫亚斌, 杜 睿, 王立伦, 姚建刚. 厨余垃圾中高温高效厌氧产沼中试研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 39-45.
[4] 孙彩平, 陈子琦, 曾 琴, 黄健康, 何健和, 徐思源, 张 蕾, 杨鲁昕, 李 欢. 不同操作条件下果蔬垃圾厌氧发酵产乙醇的规律[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 46-52.
[5] 章 爽, 关伟杰, 孙海曙, 赵 盼, 王万清, 高 明, 孙晓红, 汪群慧. 间歇通电改善微生物电解池辅助的餐厨垃圾和菌糠的嗜热厌氧共消化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(2): 128-128.
[6] 李阳青, 张云霞, 于 淼, 常宝军, 张 凯. 厨余垃圾中温干式厌氧发酵系统调试阶段工况分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(6): 69-73.
[7] 蓝苑瑗, 吴 松, 王 磊. 物料调理缓解餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化效应及其机制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 27-34.
[8] 董成耀, 顾 霞, 赵 磊, 周永泉, 李 响. 餐厨垃圾厌氧生物转化预处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 24-32.
[9] 章 爽, 马欣欣, 孙海曙, 谢 栋, 赵 盼, 汪群慧, 吴川福, 高 明. 餐厨垃圾和菌糠的半连续中温-高温两相厌氧共消化:产甲烷性能、微生物和宏基因组分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(2): 127-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发