环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 59-63.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.03.009

• 热化学处理与烟气污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾焚烧发电厂变频给水泵运行改造节能分析

陈海军,许 睿,赵景才,龙吉生   

  1. 上海康恒环境股份有限公司
  • 出版日期:2024-07-02 发布日期:2024-07-02

Energy Saving Analysis of Conversion Feed Pump Operation Transformation in Waste Incineration Power Plant

CHEN Haijun, XU Rui, ZHAO Jingcai, LONG Jisheng   

  1. Shanghai SUS Environment Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-07-02 Published:2024-07-02

摘要: 随着变频技术的逐渐成熟,垃圾焚烧发电厂的给水泵大都由定速给水泵替换为变频给水泵,但锅炉给水系统仍采用传统的给水控制逻辑,未能完全挖掘变频给水泵的节能潜力。通过对垃圾焚烧发电厂锅炉给水系统的整体分析,对原有的给水系统控制逻辑进行改造。单炉规模下,由变频给水泵直接控制汽包水位,给水调节阀全开,实现锅炉给水系统平均节电0.28 kWh/t,节电率为7.2%,每月单位给水能耗的方差由0.064下降至0.033,给水系统稳定性大幅增加,年节省电量109.5 MWh,折合碳减排量为62.45 tCO2;多炉规模下,变频给水泵母管压力跟随汽包压力变化而变化,实现给水系统平均节电0.29 kWh/t,节电率接近7.2%,平均单位给水方差下降约36%,给水系统稳定性得到大幅提高,年节省电量380.8 MWh,折合碳减排量为217.17 tCO2。

关键词: 垃圾焚烧, 变频给水泵, 给水系统新逻辑, 节能

Abstract: With the gradual maturity of frequency conversion technology, most of the feedwater pumps in waste incineration power plants were replaced by constant speed feedwater pumps with variable frequency feedwater pumps, but the boiler feedwater system still adopted traditional feedwater control logic, which failed to fully tap the energy saving potential of variable frequency feedwater pumps. Through the overall analysis of the boiler feed water system of waste incineration power plant, the control logic of the original feed water system was reformed. At a single boiler scale, the drum water level was directly controlled by the frequency conversion feed water pump, and the feed water control valve was fully open. The average power saving of the water supply system was 0.28 kWh/t, the power saving rate was 7.2%. The variance of monthly unit water supply energy consumption was reduced from 0.064 to 0.033, and the stability of the water supply system was greatly increased, annual power saving of 109.5 MWh, equivalent to carbon reduction of 62.45 tCO2. Under multiple boiler scales, the pressure of the main pipe of the variable frequency feed pump changed with the pressure of the drum. The average power saving of the water supply system was 0.29 kWh/t, the power saving rate was 7.2%. The average unit feedwater variance was reduced by about 36%, the stability of the water supply system was greatly improved,annual power saving was 380.8 MWh, equivalent to carbon reduction of 217.17 tCO2 .

Key words: waste incineration, variable frequency feed water pump, new logic of water supply system, energy saving

[1] 邱清文. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰填埋场岩土工程设计建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[2] 胡洪磊, 龙吉生, 吴亚中. 垃圾焚烧项目烟气再循环设备腐蚀原因与优化方案[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 97-101.
[3] 段盼巧, 李雅昕, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧厂白烟来源及控制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[4] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[5] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[6] 段飞飞, 朱传强, 杨 林, 扈明东, 尹晓龙, 韩 昊. 大容量垃圾焚烧炉内脱硫脱硝一体化工艺研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 64-69.
[7] 龚 越. 面向垃圾焚烧余热锅炉受热面的超频震波清灰技术应用与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 74-79.
[8] 甘 洁, 刘 豪, 李建辉. 国内外生活垃圾焚烧厂的水排放与监管标准比较分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 11-16.
[9] 田 伟, 陈 琮, 彭 莉, 陈玉成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物的重金属污染特征及环境风险评估[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[10] 陈 璐, 杨德坤, 龙吉生. 一体化烟气净化工艺对生活垃圾焚烧厂多污染物协同脱除特性的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 51-57.
[11] 王延涛, 龙吉生, 秦 峰. 生活垃圾焚烧发电厂设计参数与焚烧负荷变化的统计分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 58-62,71.
[12] 黄 华, 黄正鹏, 沈元鹏, 李 浓. 生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液全量化处理技术研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 78-82.
[13] 邹 昕. 中国垃圾焚烧标准回顾与分析(封底文章))[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 97-104,111.
[14] 段盼巧, 刘晶昊, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧项目可靠性评价分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 112-116.
[15] 李俊成, 毛梦梅, 龙吉生. 掺烧污泥对垃圾焚烧发电厂烟气净化系统的影响——以某污泥协同焚烧项目为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(3): 54-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发