环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 111-115.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.016

• 固体废物处理生命周期评价与碳足迹 • 上一篇    下一篇

厨余垃圾和农林废弃物好氧堆肥协同处理碳排放核算——以某镇处理设施为例

朱远超,赵子旼,张劲松   

  1. 1. 北京市城市管理研究院;2. 生活垃圾检测分析与评价北京市重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-01

Caculation of Carbon Emission During Co-composting of Food Waste and Agricultural Waste and Garden Waste: A Case Study of A Treatment Facility in Town

ZHU Yuanchao,ZHAO Zimin,ZHANG Jinsong   

  1. 1. Beijing Municipal Institute of City Management; 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Waste Detection Analysis and Evaluation
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

摘要: 以华北区域某镇厨余垃圾和农林废弃物协同好氧堆肥处理设施为例,利用排放因子法估算其垃圾收运、处理及资源化的碳排放量,碳排放量为143.71 kgCO2/t。结果表明:该设施收集运输阶段碳排放量为1.04 kgCO2/t,其低于经过转运运输至大型集中处理设施;处理阶段直接碳排放量为193.50 kgCO2/t,好氧堆肥阶段产生的CH4和N2O的无组织逸散,是影响其碳排放水平的关键因素;处理阶段间接碳排放量为4.16 kgCO2/t,设备能耗碳排放量低于使用加热及氧气补充设备能耗的工艺;堆肥产品的碳减排量为55.00 kgCO2/t,具有明显的碳减排效应。因此,应通过保持堆体氧气含量不低于8%、含水率为50%~65%、反应温度在55 ℃以上,以及增加密闭辅助设施、定期翻堆作业和保证足够的堆肥时间等措施降低直接碳排放量。

关键词: 厨余垃圾, 协同好氧堆肥, 碳排放, 排放因子法

Abstract: A co-aerobic composting treatment facility for food waste and agricultural waste and garden waste in a town in North China was taken as an example, the emission factor method was used to calculate the carbon emissions from collection, transportation, treatment and resource utilization. The carbon emissions were 143.71 kgCO2/t. The results showed that the carbon emissions in the collection and transportation stage were 1.04 kgCO2/t, which was lower than transporting to a centralized treatment facility. The direct carbon emissions in the treatment stage were 193.50 kgCO2/t. The unorganized escape of CH4 and N2O produced in the aerobic composting process was the key factor affected its carbon emissions level. The indirect carbon emissions in the treatment stage were 4.16 kgCO2/t, and the carbon emissions from equipment energy consumption were lower than the process of using heating and oxygen-supply equipment. The carbon reduction of compost products was 55 kgCO2/t, with obvious carbon reduction effects. Therefore, measures should be taken to reduce direct carbon emissions by maintaining the oxygen content of the heap at no less than 8%, the moisture content of 50% to 65%, the reaction temperature was above 55 ℃, and increasing closed auxiliary facilities, regularly turning operations, and ensuring sufficient composting time.

Key words: food waste, co-aerobic composting, carbon emissions, emission factor method

[1] 王慧慧, 王 领, 朱旻航, 连宋剑. 我国厨余垃圾处理设施现状及处理成本分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 12-18.
[2] 王玉洁, 仇俊杰, 吕 凡, 章 骅, 何品晶. 乳酸介导碳链延长产己酸规模化应用瓶颈[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 27-36,48.
[3] 刘 彬, 张 森, 王立彤. 厨余垃圾干式厌氧发酵处理技术的应用对比探究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 37-48.
[4] 张晓星, 王 伟, 张献华. 提油对家庭厨余垃圾厌氧资源化处理工程运营安全及经济性分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 49-55.
[5] 夏 青, 徐孝健, 张虞婷, 周呈亚, 刘海春. 扬州家庭厨余垃圾重金属赋存特征与风险评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 50-54.
[6] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[7] 刘 彬, 张 森, 王立彤. 重庆洛碛厨余垃圾干式厌氧发酵技术工程应用探究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 55-63.
[8] 王一然, 孟星尧, 李京霖, 王 攀, 任连海. 厨余垃圾好氧堆肥过程中恶臭气体研究现状[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 40-49,56.
[9] 次瀚林, 方 宁, 郭亚丽, 黄嘉良, 梅晓洁, 陈 芳, 李 静. 基于生命周期碳排放和经济成本分析的城市多源有机固废处理处置方式选择[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 1-9.
[10] 周白玉, 任 怡, 杜春燕, 朱 浩, 曹立民, 郭旭辉, 陈立坚, 韩智勇. 生活垃圾处理处置过程碳排放特征与碳达峰管理策略——基于成都市垃圾和填埋气产生实测数据的比较[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 10-19.
[11] 尚怡君, 李许南, 刘 岩, 陈永杰, 袁 伟, 陆建红. 厨余垃圾好氧堆肥中抗生素抗性基因消长研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 80-89.
[12] 王 峰, 孙金浩, 刘纹君, 陈卫华, 田弘毅, 炊春萌, 谢 冰. 不同原料配比对沼渣和厨余垃圾共堆肥的理化性质和腐熟度的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 41-47.
[13] 李剑颖, 任晓灵, 王晓燕, 赖金丽. 餐厨废弃油脂制生物柴油全生命周期碳排放分析研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 48-54.
[14] 马 想, 陈 平, 梁 晶. 两种城市源有机固体废物生物质炭理化特性研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 29-35.
[15] 周永泉, 李小伟, 邰 俊. 低剂量纸巾添加对餐厨垃圾和厨余垃圾共消化的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 36-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发