环境卫生工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 68-78,86.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2024.01.010

• 固体废物处理过程衍生污染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

动物无害化处理厂恶臭污染特征及健康风险评价

蒋微微,杨 虹,印健翔   

  1. 1.上海市动物无害化处理中心;2. 上海建科环境技术有限公司
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-01

Odor Pollution Characterization and Health Risk Assessment of An Animal Innocuous Treatment Plant

JIANG Weiwei,YANG Hong,YIN Jianxiang   

  1. 1.Shanghai Municipal Animal Innocuous Treatment Centre; 2. Shanghai Jianke Environmental Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-01

摘要: 基于上海市某动物无害化处理厂恶臭产生源、排气筒和厂界的恶臭物质监测数据,探究无害化处理厂的恶臭污染特征,并进一步评估其对周边环境和人体健康的影响。结果表明:臭气主要来源于动物尸体腐败(焚烧车间)及污水处理微生物活动(污水站)。恶臭物质主要为硫化氢(H2S)、氨(NH3)、二甲二硫和甲硫醇(最大浓度分别为5.710、2.462、0.659、0.292 mg/m3)。焚烧车间是主要的NH3贡献源,污水站是主要的H2S贡献源。排气筒和厂界恶臭物质浓度均满足DB 31/1025—2016恶臭(异味)污染物排放标准的限值要求。处理厂的主要致臭因子为H2S、甲硫醇、二甲二硫和NH3(最大阈稀释倍数分别为9 154、1 496、57和50)。对比监测数据发现,排气筒和厂界主要致臭因子存在除NH3、H2S和甲硫醇外的其他未纳入例行监测的低嗅阈值物质,后续应考虑增加例行监测因子和监测频次以更好地监控恶臭排放及影响情况。处理厂车间内环境恶臭物质浓度虽然低于职业接触限值,但仍存在非致癌风险(风险指数为4.481~1 956.440),应对车间内的有限空间严格管控,作业人员在进入时须配置防护装备,保障废气处理设施正常运行,防止泄漏,防范工作人员健康风险。

关键词: 动物无害化处理, 焚烧, 恶臭污染物, 健康风险

Abstract: Based on the monitoring data of odor generation sources, discharge outfalls and boundaries of an animal innocuous treatment plant in Shanghai, its odor pollution characteristics were explored and its impact on the surrounding environment and human health was further evaluated. The results showed that the main sources of odor were the corruption of animal carcasses (incineration workshop) and the microbial activities of sewage treatment (sewage station). The main odor pollutants were hydrogen sulfide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), dimethyl disulfide (C2H6S2) and methanethiol (CH3SH), with the maximum source contents of 5.710, 2.462, 0.659 and 0.292 mg/m3, respectively. The incineration workshop was the major contributor of NH3, while the sewage station was the major contributor of H2S. The contents at the outfalls and boundaries satisfied the standards of DB 31/1025—2016 Emission Standards of Odor Pollutants. The main odor-causing factors were H2S, CH3SH, C2H6S2 and NH3, with the maximum threshold dilution times of 9 154, 1 496, 57 and 50, respectively. Comparison of the monitoring data revealed that there were low olfactory threshold factors other than NH3, H2S and CH3SH at the outfalls and boundaries, which were not included in the routine monitoring program. Subsequent consideration should be given to increasing the routine monitoring factors and monitoring frequency to better monitor the odor emission and its impact. Although the odor substance contents in the workshop were lower than the occupational exposure limit, non-carcinogenic risks were identified with the risk index ranged from 4.481 to 1 956.440. The limited space in the workshop should be strictly controlled, and incoming operators should be equipped with protective equipment. The normal operation of the waste gas treatment facilities must be ensured, preventing leakage and protecting health risks from staff.

Key words: animal innocuous treatment, incineration, odor pollutants, health risk

[1] 邱清文. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰填埋场岩土工程设计建议[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 64-69.
[2] 胡洪磊, 龙吉生, 吴亚中. 垃圾焚烧项目烟气再循环设备腐蚀原因与优化方案[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 97-101.
[3] 段盼巧, 李雅昕, 白良成. 生活垃圾焚烧厂白烟来源及控制研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(3): 102-106,113.
[4] 戚晓波, 易 鹏, 马云峰, 林晓青. 大比例掺烧典型工业固废对生活垃圾焚烧炉燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 1-11.
[5] 付 铠, 白 旭, 史佳雨, 钱鑫鑫, 刘 璐, 周亚倩, 王鹤立. 基于全流程的生活垃圾焚烧温室气体排放核算[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(2): 12-18.
[6] 齐佳楠, 周 硕, 宁 庆, 王 欢, 李 兵, 刘海威. 我国县域生活垃圾制备固体回收燃料工艺的技术经济性分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 23-31.
[7] 严浩文, 张 蓓, 王志强, 龙吉生, 金兴乾, 郭欣维. 生活垃圾焚烧发电项目烟气再循环技术工程实践与分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2025, 33(1): 98-102.
[8] 段飞飞, 朱传强, 杨 林, 扈明东, 尹晓龙, 韩 昊. 大容量垃圾焚烧炉内脱硫脱硝一体化工艺研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 64-69.
[9] 龚 越. 面向垃圾焚烧余热锅炉受热面的超频震波清灰技术应用与研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(6): 74-79.
[10] 甘 洁, 刘 豪, 李建辉. 国内外生活垃圾焚烧厂的水排放与监管标准比较分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 11-16.
[11] 余亚萍. 污泥焚烧烟气脱酸工艺技术经济分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(5): 87-92.
[12] 吕烨佳, 张 佳, 岳 阳, 钱光人. 焚烧飞灰深度资源化技术进展及展望(封面文章)[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 1-8.
[13] 田 伟, 陈 琮, 彭 莉, 陈玉成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰及其固化/稳定化产物的重金属污染特征及环境风险评估[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 9-16.
[14] 陈 璐, 杨德坤, 龙吉生. 一体化烟气净化工艺对生活垃圾焚烧厂多污染物协同脱除特性的研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 51-57.
[15] 王延涛, 龙吉生, 秦 峰. 生活垃圾焚烧发电厂设计参数与焚烧负荷变化的统计分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2024, 32(4): 58-62,71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发