厨余垃圾,处理技术,成本分析,降本增效 ," /> 厨余垃圾,处理技术,成本分析,降本增效 ,"/> Food waste, Treatment technologies, Cost analysis, Cost reduction and efficiency improvement ,"/> 我国厨余垃圾处理设施现状及成本分析

环境卫生工程

• •    下一篇

我国厨余垃圾处理设施现状及成本分析

  

  1. 1、宁波市市容环境卫生指导中心(宁波市生活垃圾分类指导中心);2、广州环投从化环保能源有限公司;3、中规院(北京)规划设计有限公司

Food Waste Treatment Facilities in China: Operational Status and Cost Drivers

  1. 1、Ningbo Municipal Solid Waste Classification Guidance Center;2、Guangzhou Huantou Conghua Environmental Protection Energy Co., Ltd;3、Caupd Beijing Planning & Design Consultants Co.,Ltd

摘要:

针对厨余垃圾处理设施建设运行状况不明晰及政府补贴过高影响决策管理的问题,本研究系统收集并分析了全国530座集中处理设施和3971座分散处理设施(合计处理能力14.11万吨/日)的运营数据。研究发现:现有处理设施平均负荷率低于70%;集中处理设施以100-300/日规模为主,技术应用占比依次为厌氧消化>协同焚烧>好氧发酵>生物转化,单位投资强度集中在30-80万元/吨,政府处理补贴中位值为232/吨;分散处理设施普遍存在能耗偏高、出料品质不稳定、产品评价体系不完善及恶臭污染控制困难等技术瓶颈,主要适用于集中处理不经济的特定场景。研究表明,资源化产品收益偏低是导致政府补贴高的关键因素,建议通过加大沼气资源化利用补贴力度、研发低成本处理技术等降本增效措施,缩小其与焚烧处理补贴的差距。本研究为优化厨余垃圾处理设施布局和补贴政策提供了数据支撑和决策依据。

关键词: 厨余垃圾')">

厨余垃圾, 处理技术, 成本分析, 降本增效

Abstract:

In response to the issues of unclear construction and operational status of food waste treatment facilities and the excessive government subsidies affecting decision-making management, this study systematically collected and analyzed operational data from 530 centralized treatment facilities and 3,971 decentralized treatment facilities nationwide, with a -total treatment capacity of 141,100 tons per day. The research finds that the average load rate of existing treatment facilities is below 70%. Centralized treatment facilities primarily operate at a  scale range of 100-300 tons per day, the application of technologies ranked as follows: anaerobic digestion > co-incineration > aerobic fermentation > biotransformation. The unit investment intensity ranges from 300,000 to 800,000 yuan per ton, and the median government subsidy for waste treatment is 232 yuan per ton. Decentralized treatment facilities generally face technical challenges such as high energy consumption, unstable output quality, incomplete product evaluation systems, and difficulties in odor pollution control, making them suitable mainly for specific scenarios where centralized treatment is not economically feasible. The study indicates that low revenue from resource recovery products is a key factor driving high government subsidies. It is recommended to implement cost-reduction and efficiency-improvement measures, such as increasing subsidies for biogas resource utilization and developing low-cost treatment technologies, to narrow the gap with incineration treatment subsidies. This research provides data support and decision-making references for optimizing the layout of food waste treatment facilities and subsidy policies.

Key words: Food waste')">

Food waste, Treatment technologies, Cost analysis, Cost reduction and efficiency improvement

[1] 董成耀, 顾 霞, 赵 磊, 周永泉, 李 响. 餐厨垃圾厌氧生物转化预处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(3): 24-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发