环境卫生工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 97-104.doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2023.06.016

• 环境卫生管理与评价体系 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同清扫作业方式与道路积尘/扬尘的关系

张发闯,熊远明,杜成松,蒋 宇,汪永东,周 敬,印红玲   

  1. 1.成都市城市管理科学研究院;2.成都信息工程大学 资源环境学院;3.成都市机动车排气污染防治技术保障中心
  • 出版日期:2024-01-05 发布日期:2024-01-05

Relationship Between Different Cleaning Methods and Road Dust and Fugitive Dust

ZHANG Fachuang, XIONG Yuanming, DU Chengsong, JIANG Yu, WANG Yongdong, ZHOU Jing, YIN Hongling   

  1. 1. Chengdu Sciences Academy of Urban Management; 2. College of Resources and Environment, Chengdu University of Information Technology; 3. Chengdu Motor Vehicle Exhaust Pollution Prevention and Control Technology Support Center
  • Online:2024-01-05 Published:2024-01-05

摘要: 道路积尘/扬尘是城市环境空气颗粒物的重要来源。为促进成都市公园城市的建设,通过模拟实验探究不同清扫保洁作业方式与道路积尘/扬尘间的关系。结果表明,当积尘负荷和尘土量较高时,单一的作业方式中“干扫”对积尘负荷(86.78%)及尘土量(66.95%)的清除效率均最高,但人群感官体验较差;“洗扫”效果次于“干扫”,但人群感官体验较好。清扫保洁作业组合方式优先选择“干扫+冲洗”“洗扫+冲洗”。当积尘负荷和尘土量较低时,单一的作业方式“干扫”或“洗扫”即可。道路清扫作业期间,路边大气中TSP、PM2.5、PM10的质量浓度上升20%左右;清扫完成5~10 min后,路边大气中颗粒物浓度基本不受影响。建议道路清扫作业车辆可通过增加隔板或扬尘收集罩等装置改造以便推广清扫效果较好的“干扫”,可引入抑尘剂/消融剂等新型材料或新技术去除道路两侧道路构造内嵌入的老旧、压实的残土,切实提高人群感官舒适度,保护人体健康。

关键词: 清扫方式, 道路扬尘, 积尘负荷, 尘土量, 清除效率, 颗粒物

Abstract: Road dust and fugitive dust are important sources of particulate matter in urban ambient air. In order to promote the construction of Chengdu park city, the relationship between different cleaning methods and road dust and fugitive dust was explored through simulation experiments. The results showed that when the dust load and dust volume were high, the single operation method of “dry sweeping” had the highest removal efficiency for both the dust load (86.78%) and dust volume (66.95%), but the sensory experience of the crowd was poor. The effect of “washing and sweeping” was inferior to “dry sweeping”, but the sensory experience of the crowd was better. Priority should be given to selecting the combination method of “dry sweeping+washing” and “washing sweeping+washing”. When the dust load and amount were low, a single operation method of “dry sweeping” or “washing sweeping” was sufficient. During the road cleaning operation, the mass concentrations of TSP, PM2.5 and PM10 in the roadside atmosphere increased by about 20%; After 5-10 minutes of cleaning, the concentration of particulate matter in the roadside atmosphere would not be affected. It was suggested that the road cleaning vehicles could be improved by adding partitions or dust collection covers and other devices to promote the “dry cleaning” with high cleaning efficiency. New materials or new technologies such as dust suppressor and ablation agent could be introduced to remove the old and compacted residual soil embedded in the road structure on both sides of the road, that could effectively improve the sensory comfort of the crowd and protect human health.

Key words: cleaning method, road dust, dust load, amount of dust, removal efficiency, particulate matter

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张福泉. 通辽市某垃圾填埋场地下水水质现状评价[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 36 -38 .
[2] 袁 松 黄丹丹 段怡彤. 生活垃圾转运站臭气属性特征及不同除臭工艺效果分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 56 -58 .
[3] 刘 霄. 垃圾焚烧发电厂汽水管道应力分析和支吊架设计的优化[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 59 -62 .
[4] 白贤祥 张玉刚. 生活垃圾焚烧厂余热锅炉水冷壁高温腐蚀治理研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 68 -70 .
[5] 杨森林 王科林 吴善荀 等. 餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(3): 87 -90 .
[6] 郑苇刘淑玲李波靳俊平. 禽畜干清粪工艺产生鲜粪的厌氧消化处理技术探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 5 -8 .
[7] 王晓燕胡昌夏孙晨阳徐利奇. CJ/T 280—2008塑料垃圾桶通用技术条件标准实施情况解析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 63 -65 .
[8] 朱志军刘文涛. 北京市餐厨垃圾现状调查及减量化路径研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 66 -69 .
[9] 何晟洪毅干磊. 苏州市建筑垃圾智能化监管平台设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 77 -79 .
[10] 梁永宽李逸民. 填埋气掺烧天然气发电收益估算——以荣昌填埋气发电厂为例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(1): 80 -83 .
版权所有 © 天津市城市管理研究中心
津ICP备2022007900号-1   津公网安备 12010302000952号   中央网信办违法和不良信息举报中心
地址:天津市河西区围堤道107号    邮政编码: 300201
电话: 022-28365069 传真: 022-28365080 E-mail: csglwyjs10@tj.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发